Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

   > Gregory Maxwell (gmaxwell@xxxxxxxxx) said:
   >> If some some spin decided to make every user run as root, ship
   >> with no firewalling, have password-less accounts, or have
   >> insecure services enabled by default, etc.

   > You mean Sugar as configured on the XO? (It has passwordless
   > user, who can su without a password.)

It's true, but note that the XO software is technically a "Remix"
rather than a "Spin", so there aren't any technical requirements
on it to satisfy the use of the Fedora mark.  (I think I'd agree
with Greg's point regarding official Fedora spins.)

- Chris.
-- 
Chris Ball   <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx>
One Laptop Per Child

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux