Chris Ball (cjb@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > >> If some some spin decided to make every user run as root, ship > >> with no firewalling, have password-less accounts, or have > >> insecure services enabled by default, etc. > > > You mean Sugar as configured on the XO? (It has passwordless > > user, who can su without a password.) > > It's true, but note that the XO software is technically a "Remix" > rather than a "Spin", so there aren't any technical requirements > on it to satisfy the use of the Fedora mark. (I think I'd agree > with Greg's point regarding official Fedora spins.) But if it was such a concern with respect to the Fedora brand and image, I would think the same argument would apply, even if it was just branded as a 'Fedora remix'. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
