On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 15:34 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Chris Ball (cjb@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > >> If some some spin decided to make every user run as root, ship > > >> with no firewalling, have password-less accounts, or have > > >> insecure services enabled by default, etc. > > > > > You mean Sugar as configured on the XO? (It has passwordless > > > user, who can su without a password.) > > > > It's true, but note that the XO software is technically a "Remix" > > rather than a "Spin", so there aren't any technical requirements > > on it to satisfy the use of the Fedora mark. (I think I'd agree > > with Greg's point regarding official Fedora spins.) > > But if it was such a concern with respect to the Fedora brand and > image, I would think the same argument would apply, even if it > was just branded as a 'Fedora remix'. SoaS is not Fedora-branded in any way, AFAIK. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
