Adam Williamson (awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > It's true, but note that the XO software is technically a "Remix" > > > rather than a "Spin", so there aren't any technical requirements > > > on it to satisfy the use of the Fedora mark. (I think I'd agree > > > with Greg's point regarding official Fedora spins.) > > > > But if it was such a concern with respect to the Fedora brand and > > image, I would think the same argument would apply, even if it > > was just branded as a 'Fedora remix'. > > SoaS is not Fedora-branded in any way, AFAIK. Yes, but how often have we touted XO, Sugar, et. al. as being 'based on Fedora' over the past 4 years? Heck, you could argue it's gotten more press than some of our official spins. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
