Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

   > Yes, but how often have we touted XO, Sugar, et. al. as being
   > 'based on Fedora' over the past 4 years? Heck, you could argue
   > it's gotten more press than some of our official spins.

Right, but "based on Fedora" is fine:  it correctly conveys the
impression that we took a pristine and sane Fedora and then messed
around with it to our heart's content.  :)

I don't think anyone's left with the impression that OLPC's security
choices are a direct duplicate of Fedora's, which *is* a reasonable
impression to have if you download a Fedora spin that's advertised, as
most spins are, as "the core of Fedora plus some app you really like".

- Chris.
-- 
Chris Ball   <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx>
One Laptop Per Child

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux