Re: [RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le lundi 23 novembre 2009 à 13:48 -0600, Chris Adams a écrit :
> Once upon a time, Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> said:
> > Le lundi 23 novembre 2009 à 09:51 -0700, Jerry James a écrit :
> > > 1) I'm going to nag you forever about a problem you can't fix.
> > 
> > This is false, it can get fixed, either with code changes or by dropping
> > the offending package
> 
> Core fonts are not going away, are they? 

The infra no, the fonts (or at least part of them) yes

>  Then why the hate for legacy
> packages using a legacy interface?

The interface is legacy because it didn't work well, and we do not have
users sophisticated enough to undestand their font problems are caused
by their wandering in the legacy minefield land some packagers
recklessly expose.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux