Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 16:14 -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> said:
> > On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 15:54 -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> > > I have a Thinkpad from early 2006 that is 32 bit only for example.  It
> > > works perfectly fine, so I am in no hurry to replace it just because it
> > > is only 32 bit.
> > 
> > see my 'oops' follow-up - I forgot to consider the first rev of the Core
> > architecture, which was 32-bit only and current until Jan 2007. The
> > follow-up 'Core 2' architecture was x86-64 capable. You probably have a
> > Core Duo or Core Solo CPU in that thing.
> 
> I just checked, and it is actually a Pentium M (Dothan core).

damn, my psychic powers stink lately.

-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux