Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 12:23:33PM +0100, Benny Amorsen wrote:
> Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > This is, sadly, intentional. I and others have been complaining about this 
> > for months, we got ignored, all in the names of making things work for 
> > people who are not smart enough to figure out whether their computer is 64-
> > bit or not. The argument that almost all new non-netbook machines are 64-bit 
> > anyway also got ignored.
> 
> If only the 32-bit version was smart enough to install a 64-bit kernel
> when appropriate, this would not be such a disaster. Running a 32-bit
> kernel with 4GB of memory is asking for trouble, and machines with 4GB
> are probably as common as netbooks.

  Like in this failed F11 feature?
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Features/ArchitectureSupport&diff=86872&oldid=82905

-- 
Tomasz Torcz               RIP is irrevelant. Spoofing is futile.
xmpp: zdzichubg@xxxxxxxxx     Your routes will be aggreggated. -- Alex Yuriev

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux