Re: Security policy oversight needed?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Colin Walters (walters@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > Which is why you do it with specifically selected policy packages, and
> > not trying to write out files in %post.  Create a set of policy packages
> > that define certain user cases, and pick from those as you construct a
> > spin.
> 
> This makes sense to me; but there are details to work out.
> 
> * Do we have any guidelines on what the policy should be in upstream
> source?  Corresponding Fedora RPMs?

No, but we probably should.

> * Do we have a fedora-default-policykit-policy?

polkit-desktop-policy?

> * How do we get this installed on upgrades?  Code in preupgrade?

In that case, it gets pulled in as a gnome-session dependency.

Bill

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux