Re: Security policy oversight needed?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 09:14 -0500, Owen Taylor wrote:
> It doesn't work practically: configuration for packages needs to live
> with the package. Putting gigantic amounts of configuration into the 
> %post of a kickstart file quickly becomes unmanageable. And the idea
> that we make configuration changes in the %post of the kickstart really
> falls part badly once people start upgrading their install to the next
> version of Fedora.
> 

Which is why you do it with specifically selected policy packages, and
not trying to write out files in %post.  Create a set of policy packages
that define certain user cases, and pick from those as you construct a
spin.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux