On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 21:57 -0500, Justin wrote: > > We've gotten enough feedback. We don't need 300 more people giving the same > > arguments over and over or empty +1s or votes. Please relax and let the > > developer handle it, followed by fesco. > > > > I'm on Fedora largely for the security policy (best SELinux > implementation available, for example), but I can't be the only one > seriously considering a switch because of this. Not because the > mistake was made, but because I actually watched Fedora developers try > to defend it when the only response should have been an immediate fix > followed by revocation of all privileges of the package maintainer > until his permanent status could be decided. > > The total turn around since the initial discovery will be three days > come tomorrow's FESCo meeting, plus whatever time it takes after that > to get a fix pushed out. That's completely unacceptable. I think an > emergency meeting would have been more than appropriate given the > situation and general reaction here. > > In short: If it hasn't been handled yet, you apparently haven't had > nearly enough feedback. > for folks who are not members of the announce list: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2009-November/msg00012.html regards, Ankur -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
