> We've gotten enough feedback. We don't need 300 more people giving the same > arguments over and over or empty +1s or votes. Please relax and let the > developer handle it, followed by fesco. > I'm on Fedora largely for the security policy (best SELinux implementation available, for example), but I can't be the only one seriously considering a switch because of this. Not because the mistake was made, but because I actually watched Fedora developers try to defend it when the only response should have been an immediate fix followed by revocation of all privileges of the package maintainer until his permanent status could be decided. The total turn around since the initial discovery will be three days come tomorrow's FESCo meeting, plus whatever time it takes after that to get a fix pushed out. That's completely unacceptable. I think an emergency meeting would have been more than appropriate given the situation and general reaction here. In short: If it hasn't been handled yet, you apparently haven't had nearly enough feedback. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
