Re: abrt and bugzilla

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 11:24 +0000, Matthew Booth wrote:
> Firstly, I'd like to say I think abrt is fantastic. Call what follows a 
> nit-pick. It's just a pretty in-your-face nit.
> 
> After installing F12, after a short while I got presented with a couple 
> of SELinux errors. This is nothing unusual in a new Fedora release, but 
> this time it asked me for my bugzilla login details and offered to 
> submit the bug automatically for me. Fantastic! The lazy person in me 
> who wants to do the right thing truly appreciates this. Turns out I 
> wasn't the first person report them, so it added me to the CC list.

If these were selinux reports, you were not actually using abrt. You
were using the enhanced features of setroubleshoot, which can now submit
problems to Bugzilla.

All your points happen to be valid, however, and applicable to both.
Which is handy =)

-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux