On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 14:33 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 14:08 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > This list of packages > > would be what the QA team would test with regard to the security policy. > > We also believe there ought to be a process for maintaining this list, > > and additions to the packaging guidelines for any new package which > > would be on this list or any existing package for which a proposed > > change would add it to this list. We could also hook AutoQA into this > > process, to run additional tests on security-sensitive packages or alert > > us when a package change was submitted which added security-sensitive > > elements to an existing package. > > I would warn against trying to have a manual static list of packages > here, same as crit-path. These packages need to be discoverable via > software. yeah, sorry - I was thinking along the same lines, having a script to generate the list. I thought that was kind of implied in what I wrote but I guess not :) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
