On 11/25/2009 12:24 AM, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 12:24 -0600, Sir Gallantmon wrote: >> Why not label it "x86_32" instead of i386? That is far less confusing and >> illustrates that it is 32-bit on the x86 architecture, since x86_64 says it >> is 64-bit on x86 architecture. > > Because that's not what uname says. Change that, and then we'll talk. What uname says doesn't have to match the ISO arch name at all. The suggestion above is very valid and you should consider implementing it to avoid confusion. Our users would be thankful and so would I, not having to answer questions about this anymore. Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
