Re: [RFA] Font audit results for Fedora 12 (final)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [RFA] Font audit results for Fedora 12 (final)
From: Neal Becker <ndbecker2@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:43:21 -0500
Cc: fedora-fonts-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Followup-to: gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.fonts
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KNode/4.3.2

What does this mean?

I received one for libotf.  Neither libotf, nor libotf-devel seem to 
ship any fonts.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFA] Font audit results for Fedora 12 (final)
  - From: Nicolas Mailhot

References:
- [RFA] Font audit results for Fedora 12 and 2009-11-22 fedora-devel
  - From: Nicolas Mailhot

Prev by Date: [RFA] Font package differences between Fedora 12 and 2009-11-22 Fedora devel
Next by Date: Re: [RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA
Previous by thread: [RFA] Font test result differences between Fedora 11 and Fedora 12
Next by thread: Re: [RFA] Font audit results for Fedora 12 (final)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux