Re: Security policy oversight needed?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Adam Williamson wrote:
> It's a point I've made elsewhere, but I'm not sure it's perfectly okay
> to keep talking about 'the desktop spin'. First of all, this does not
> only affect the desktop live image: it also affects a default install
> from either the DVD image or a network install. PackageKit is installed
> by default in both those cases.
> 
> (I wouldn't be surprised if it's also on the Xfce and LXDE spins too,
> btw).

It's also on the KDE spin. KPackageKit uses the same PackageKit behind the 
scenes as gnome-packagekit.

And besides, I don't see this policy change as being appropriate even for 
the GNOME desktop spin.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux