On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 23:02 +0000, Bojan Smojver wrote: > Adam Williamson <awilliam <at> redhat.com> writes: > > > What would you suggest would be better > > than escalating the issue at the first available opportunity to the > > appropriate authority - FESco - which is exactly what's happened? > > RH folks in charge of this package (or packages) should tell everyone that their > concerns have been listened to and that the _default_ will be corrected really > soon (e.g. by pointing to a Koji build). It's a bug after all, isn't it? What has this got to do with Red Hat? you seem to be seriously concerned that people with Red Hat email addresses haven't just fixed this problem. This is a Fedora issue and its up to the Fedora maintainers (regardless of company) to fix this. Dave. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
