On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 09:25 +1100, Bojan Smojver wrote: > On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 03:00 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > I would have thought, it should have actually convinced you to not > > indulge in same thing but apparently not. I will lower my expectations. > > You don't seem to realise that right now you have a protest staged > outside your office. Your response appears to be "all you stupid people > go home and wait for a decision". No-one's calling anyone stupid. What would you suggest would be better than escalating the issue at the first available opportunity to the appropriate authority - FESco - which is exactly what's happened? The only alternative is for someone to abuse Red Hat chains of command to force some kind of change in this policy, which is exactly the kind of thing that should _not_ happen in Fedora. The current process appears to precisely the correct one, so far as I can see. The issue will be considered in very timely fashion by the appropriately-constituted (and majority-elected!) authority, which will decide what the appropriate response will be. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
