Adam Williamson <awilliam <at> redhat.com> writes: > What would you suggest would be better > than escalating the issue at the first available opportunity to the > appropriate authority - FESco - which is exactly what's happened? RH folks in charge of this package (or packages) should tell everyone that their concerns have been listened to and that the _default_ will be corrected really soon (e.g. by pointing to a Koji build). It's a bug after all, isn't it? Now if FESCO want to confirm/revert this fix after hearing all the concerns from people, that's their business. -- Bojan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
