On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:48:13PM -0500, David Nalley wrote: > > The packaging guidelines, are honestly sooo voluminous, and also so > scattered, that it's an interesting problem for new packagers, and the > getting started as a packager documentation is the same way. Much of > that could be improved (and at one time there was an effort going on > towards that end.) but it will never become 'easy'. > Putting a plug in, I want to find some ways to improve the organization of the Guidelines at the Toronto FUDCon. details here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Toronto_2009_Packaging_Guidelines_Hackfest If you'd like to add something about what you see as failing in your particular review and possible solutions, that would be great! (Maybe we need a glossary of terms. Maybe we need to have an additional Link for a koji scratch build and an explanation of what that is... brainstorm away!) > In the end, don't > hesitate to ask for help or say you don't know. Part of the process is > learning how to become effectively lost. Failure, within Fedora is OK, > and even encouraged, provided you correct it and learn from it. +1 -Toshio
Attachment:
pgphuYsHSbTNW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
