may be, but sponsors or reviewers doesn't have entire day free time. I have only asked reporter to post spec file + src.rpm file. > > The difference being that *you* point out a specific item in the > guidelines (helpful!) whereas the reviewer pointed at the top-level Wiki > page for maintainers only. What the heck? Comment 10 in that ticket is > either a bad joke or poor attitude, IMO. If everybody were aware of all > guidelines, remembered them all the time and never made mistakes, we would > not need the review process and not the sponsorship process either. > > With regard to the sub-packages and the dozens of conditionals, at > least making use of %bcond_with based conditional builds would be > worthwhile. See e.g. /usr/lib/rpm/macros for "bcond" documentation. > -- ------------ Itamar Reis Peixoto e-mail/msn/google talk/sip: itamar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx skype: itamarjp icq: 81053601 +55 11 4063 5033 +55 34 3221 8599 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
