Re: A silly question about our "FC" tag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2009/11/18 Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 17:11 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>>> Actually not if done in conjunction with a release bump, such as we do
>>> with a mass rebuild.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Only if we make a promise to never use the same base n-v-r across the
>> releases until whichever release we did the mass rebuild on is retired.
>>
>> You are correct in that if we did a mass rebuild in dist-f13, we could
>> move to .f##, but consider 3 days later a maintainer wants to push a new
>> upstream release across the branches:
>>
>> foo-1.2-1.fc11
>> foo-1.2-1.fc12
>> foo-1.2-1.f13
>>
>> We're back in the same boat where the "fc" packages will be n-v-r
>> higher.
>>
>
> Is RPM so hard to hack to work this around?
>
> Orcan
>

One may opt not to use the dist tag, of course.


-- 
Mat Booth

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux