On 11/18/2009 09:43 AM, Mat Booth wrote: > 2009/11/18 Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora@xxxxxxxxx>: >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Jesse Keating wrote: >>> On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 17:11 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >>>> Actually not if done in conjunction with a release bump, such as we do >>>> with a mass rebuild. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Only if we make a promise to never use the same base n-v-r across the >>> releases until whichever release we did the mass rebuild on is retired. >>> >>> You are correct in that if we did a mass rebuild in dist-f13, we could >>> move to .f##, but consider 3 days later a maintainer wants to push a new >>> upstream release across the branches: >>> >>> foo-1.2-1.fc11 >>> foo-1.2-1.fc12 >>> foo-1.2-1.f13 >>> >>> We're back in the same boat where the "fc" packages will be n-v-r >>> higher. >>> >> >> Is RPM so hard to hack to work this around? >> >> Orcan >> > > One may opt not to use the dist tag, of course. > > [cdahlin@fearengine ~]$ rpmdev-vercmp foo-1.0-1.fc12 foo-1.0-1.12f 0:foo-1.0-1.12f is newer ....just sayin'.... --CJD -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
