On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 10:51 AM, drago01 <drago01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Sir Gallantmon <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Jonathan Dieter <jdieter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 00:52 -0500, Bill McGonigle wrote: >>> > On 11/21/2009 03:52 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote: >>> > > FWIW, there is a syslinux module named ifcpu64 that will load >>> > > different >>> > > kernels/initrds based on whether the cpu is 64-bit. >>> > >>> > Cool, do syslinux modules work in isolinux? We could have a tiny 32-bit >>> > image on a 64-bit CD that would say, "sorry, you got the wrong CD". >>> >>> They should; it's all the same project. I think the the 64-bit kernel >>> already gives a sane error message when you attempt to run it on a >>> 32-bit machine. >>> >>> Jonathan >>> >> >> I wonder... Why can't we have 32-bit Linux able to run 64-bit applications? >> Mac OS X can do it. > > 1) because it isn't possible > 2) no it doesn't mac OS X use a 64bit hypervisor and run the rest inside it. An more importantly ... why should we want that? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
