Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Matthias Clasen wrote:

I don't want to ship a desktop that doesn't let the user do useful
things.

And you can ship a desktop SPIN that way. But the base pkgs should not install with an insecure set of choices.

if you want the spin to have a post-scriptlet which allows more things, then that's the choice of the desktop sig over the desktop spin.

We should not be forcing the choices for the desktop spin on everyone who installs a pkg in the distribution.

-sv

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux