GCC Help

• Thread Index

• Re: gcc hangs ! (version 4.1.2, Ubuntu 4.1.2-0ubuntu4)
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC: Compilation using C/C++
  • From: Fabian Cenedese <Cenedese@xxxxxxxx>
• GCC: Compilation using C/C++
  • From: Ricardo Sardano Guanciale <ricardo.guanciale@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Building cross compiler for x86_64
  • From: "Frank W. Miller" <fwmiller@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gmp/mpfr - build, host, or target?
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gmp/mpfr - build, host, or target?
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to instrument a program using GCC
  • From: "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trouble converting libgsl.a -> libgsl.so on cygwin
  • From: "Mirko Vukovic" <mirko.vukovic@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gmp/mpfr - build, host, or target?
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trouble converting libgsl.a -> libgsl.so on cygwin
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• trouble converting libgsl.a -> libgsl.so on cygwin
  • From: "Mirko Vukovic" <mirko.vukovic@xxxxxxxxx>
• Why does gcc's Makefile have so many targets?
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• gmp/mpfr - build, host, or target?
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building cross compiler for x86_64
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building cross compiler for x86_64
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building cross compiler for x86_64
  • From: "Frank W. Miller" <fwmiller@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building cross compiler for x86_64
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Building cross compiler for x86_64
  • From: "Frank W. Miller" <fwmiller@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building cross compiler for x86_64
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• How to instrument a program using GCC
  • From: "Haifeng He" <hehaifeng2nd@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Forward declaration of classes needed when using GCJ?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Building cross compiler for x86_64
  • From: "Frank W. Miller" <fwmiller@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Forward declaration of classes needed when using GCJ?
  • From: Andrew W <ajwood@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Should it be reported as a bug? (-O2 and cmpxchg instruction)
  • From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: x = ++x + ++x
  • From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Should it be reported as a bug? (-O2 and cmpxchg instruction)
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• x = ++x + ++x
  • From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Should it be reported as a bug? (-O2 and cmpxchg instruction)
  • From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Should it be reported as a bug? (-O2 and cmpxchg instruction)
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Should it be reported as a bug? (-O2 and cmpxchg instruction)
  • From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Should it be reported as a bug? (-O2 and cmpxchg instruction)
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Should it be reported as a bug? (-O2 and cmpxchg instruction)
  • From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Should it be reported as a bug? (-O2 and cmpxchg instruction)
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Should it be reported as a bug? (-O2 and cmpxchg instruction)
  • From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building a cross compiler for x86_64
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Building a cross compiler for x86_64
  • From: "Frank W. Miller" <fwmiller@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building a cross compiler for x86_64
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Building a cross compiler for x86_64
  • From: "Frank W. Miller" <fwmiller@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc install problem
  • From: "Tom Browder" <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building a cross compiler for x86_64
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: static linking warning
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can GCC use more than 4G while compiling ?
  • From: Tomas Kalibera <kalibera@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: STL problems in GCC 4.1.2
  • From: "David Arthur" <darthur@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Building a cross compiler for x86_64
  • From: "Frank W. Miller" <fwmiller@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Problems with __attribute__
  • From: Angus <angus@xxxxxxxxxx>
• static linking warning
  • From: burlen <burlen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc install problem
  • From: Jim Marshall <jim.marshall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Curious global variable bug? Bad assumptions on my part?
  • From: Tom St Denis <tstdenis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Curious global variable bug? Bad assumptions on my part?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Curious global variable bug? Bad assumptions on my part?
  • From: Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Curious global variable bug? Bad assumptions on my part?
  • From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Curious global variable bug? Bad assumptions on my part?
  • From: Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Curious global variable bug? Bad assumptions on my part?
  • From: "Tynan Wilke" <tynan.wilke@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Curious global variable bug? Bad assumptions on my part?
  • From: Tony Wetmore <tony.wetmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Curious global variable bug? Bad assumptions on my part?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Curious global variable bug? Bad assumptions on my part?
  • From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Curious global variable bug? Bad assumptions on my part?
  • From: "Tynan Wilke" <tynan.wilke@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Curious global variable bug? Bad assumptions on my part?
  • From: Tom St Denis <tstdenis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Curious global variable bug? Bad assumptions on my part?
  • From: Tony Wetmore <tony.wetmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Curious global variable bug? Bad assumptions on my part?
  • From: "Tynan Wilke" <tynan.wilke@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc install problem
  • From: Tim Prince <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• How to build a stripped version of gcc
  • From: Philippe Scelers <philippe_scelers@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: AIX 5.3 gcc 4.1.2 bootstrap error
  • From: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@xxxxxx>
• AIX 5.3 gcc 4.1.2 bootstrap error
  • From: Ben Scurr <bs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc install problem
  • From: sgtbob <rrunion@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Can GCC use more than 4G while compiling ?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can GCC use more than 4G while compiling ?
  • From: Tomas Kalibera <kalibera@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can GCC use more than 4G while compiling ?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Warning when passing int, but unsigned int is awaited?
  • From: "James Tebneff" <tebneff@xxxxxxxxx>
• Can GCC use more than 4G while compiling ?
  • From: Tomas Kalibera <kalibera@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: dead code identification
  • From: "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Gloom and despair. Can't link any STL objects (gcc 4.2.2 on AIX 5.2)
  • From: "Jonathan Saxton" <jsaxton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Warning when passing int, but unsigned int is awaited?
  • From: Robert William Fuller <hydrologiccycle@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Subject: Re: Problem Executing Application Beginning at gcc Version 4.1.3
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: dead code identification
  • From: Robert William Fuller <hydrologiccycle@xxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: Problem Executing Application Beginning at gcc Version 4.1.3
  • From: Marshall Lake <mlake@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: dead code identification
  • From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: dead code identification
  • From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: dead code identification
  • From: Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Warning when passing int, but unsigned int is awaited?
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: dead code identification
  • From: Mark Hampton <mark.hampton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: dead code identification
  • From: "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: dead code identification
  • From: Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Warning when passing int, but unsigned int is awaited?
  • From: "Rene Perlberg" <Perle5000@xxxxxx>
• Re: Warning when passing int, but unsigned int is awaited?
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Warning when passing int, but unsigned int is awaited?
  • From: "Rene Perlberg" <Perle5000@xxxxxx>
• Re: make fails on ld: crti.o "no such file", but present in /usr/lib64
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: is this a valid approach to aliasing?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: dead code identification
  • From: Mark Hampton <mark.hampton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Another template/static member question
  • From: Harvey Chapman <hchapman-gcc-help@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Another template/static member question
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Summer of Code status
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Another template/static member question
  • From: Harvey Chapman <hchapman-gcc-help@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Summer of Code status
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: make fails on ld: crti.o "no such file", but present in /usr/lib64
  • From: "Ian S. Worthington" <ianworthington@xxxxxxx>
• Re: is this a valid approach to aliasing?
  • From: Robert William Fuller <hydrologiccycle@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: STL problems in GCC 4.1.2
  • From: "James Tebneff" <tebneff@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Summer of Code status
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: STL problems in GCC 4.1.2
  • From: "David Arthur" <darthur@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: STL problems in GCC 4.1.2
  • From: "Tom Browder" <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: make fails on ld: crti.o "no such file", but present in /usr/lib64
  • From: "Poor Yorick" <org.gnu.gcc.help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• STL problems in GCC 4.1.2
  • From: "David Arthur" <darthur@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: make fails on ld: crti.o "no such file", but present in /usr/lib64
  • From: "Ian S. Worthington" <ianworthington@xxxxxxx>
• Re: make fails on ld: crti.o "no such file", but present in /usr/lib64
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: make fails on ld: crti.o "no such file", but present in /usr/lib64
  • From: "Ian S. Worthington" <ianworthington@xxxxxxx>
• Re: dead code identification
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Floating Point Support
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: make fails on ld: crti.o "no such file", but present in /usr/lib64
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Forward declaration of classes needed when using GCJ?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• make fails on ld: crti.o "no such file", but present in /usr/lib64
  • From: "Ian S. Worthington" <ianworthington@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Disassemble binary with Debug info
  • From: Wombat <wombat23@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Summer of Code status
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Forward declaration of classes needed when using GCJ?
  • From: Andrew W <ajwood@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Disassemble binary with Debug info
  • From: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Disassemble binary with Debug info
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Disassemble binary with Debug info
  • From: Wombat <wombat23@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: is this a valid approach to aliasing?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: is this a valid approach to aliasing?
  • From: Robert William Fuller <hydrologiccycle@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: is this a valid approach to aliasing?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• is this a valid approach to aliasing?
  • From: Robert William Fuller <hydrologiccycle@xxxxxxxxx>
• dead code identification
  • From: Mark Hampton <mark.hampton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Forward declaration of classes needed when using GCJ?
  • From: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Forward declaration of classes needed when using GCJ?
  • From: Andrew W <ajwood@xxxxxxx>
• Floating Point Support
  • From: PatrickClarityMicro <patrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: optimization of switch statements on i386
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: optimization of switch statements on i386
  • From: "Godmar Back" <godmar@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: optimization of switch statements on i386
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Forward declaration of classes needed when using GCJ?
  • From: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: optimization of switch statements on i386
  • From: "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: optimization of switch statements on i386
  • From: "Godmar Back" <godmar@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: optimization of switch statements on i386
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Forward declaration of classes needed when using GCJ?
  • From: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Installing gcc-4.2.3 in Fedora core 8, separately from gcc-4.1
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc for sh-linux: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
  • From: "Deepak Barua" <dbbarua@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Installing gcc-4.2.3 in Fedora core 8, separately from gcc-4.1
  • From: Tim Prince <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Installing gcc-4.2.3 in Fedora core 8, separately from gcc-4.1
  • From: "Ken McFarlane" <kwmcfarlane@xxxxxxxxx>
• Forward declaration of classes needed when using GCJ?
  • From: Andrew W <ajwood@xxxxxxx>
• How to build 64-bits Ada library on SPARC Solaris 2.9 ?
  • From: Paul Duquennoy <paul.duquennoy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 64-bit for OS kernel development
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: optimization of switch statements on i386
  • From: "Godmar Back" <godmar@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: 64-bit for OS kernel development
  • From: "Frank W. Miller" <fwmiller@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: optimization of switch statements on i386
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: optimization of switch statements on i386
  • From: "Godmar Back" <godmar@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: optimization of switch statements on i386
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem Executing Application Beginning at gcc Version 4.1.3
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 64-bit for OS kernel development
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• optimization of switch statements on i386
  • From: "Godmar Back" <godmar@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: unknown directives
  • From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: unknown directives
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem about mips .data section
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• alignment problems with gglobal variables ,GCC for arc
  • From: Mike Welsen <mikewelsen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Building gcc-4.2.3
  • From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Optimiziation questions (c++)
  • From: Tony Wetmore <tony.wetmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• __sync_compare_and_swap_16 argument alignment
  • From: Tim Blechmann <tim@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: inline asm with sse problem
  • From: wojtekb82_23 <wojtekb82_23@xxxxx>
• Re: constants question
  • From: Lars Poeschel <larsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• ld: Error: Overflow detected in relocation value
  • From: Mike Welsen <mikewelsen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Building gcc-4.2.3
  • From: "Rupert Wood" <me@xxxxxxxxx>
• Building gcc-4.2.3
  • From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Optimiziation questions (c++)
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: inline asm with sse problem
  • From: Tom St Denis <tstdenis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• inline asm with sse problem
  • From: wojtekb82_23 <wojtekb82_23@xxxxx>
• Problem Executing Application Beginning at gcc Version 4.1.3
  • From: Marshall Lake <mlake@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: dot product optimization
  • From: Tim Prince <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• dot product optimization
  • From: Robert Henning <developer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• 64-bit for OS kernel development
  • From: "Frank W. Miller" <fwmiller@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• "R_386_GOTOFF relocation" on x86-solaris2.10 with native ld and GNU as
  • From: Michael Haubenwallner <michael.haubenwallner@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: "expected primary-expression before..." errors
  • From: "Tom Browder" <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: "expected primary-expression before..." errors
  • From: "Jim Stapleton" <stapleton.41@xxxxxxxxx>
• Debugging "no rule to make" messages
  • From: "Ian S. Worthington" <ianworthington@xxxxxxx>
• Re: constants question
  • From: Lars Poeschel <larsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Strange performance behaviour
  • From: Harald Grossauer <harald.grossauer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• constants question
  • From: Lars Poeschel <larsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• unknown directives
  • From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: "expected primary-expression before..." errors
  • From: "Tom Browder" <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• "expected primary-expression before..." errors
  • From: "Jim Stapleton" <stapleton.41@xxxxxxxxx>
• [SOLVED] Problem building gcc on solaris9: no rule to make target "all" in gcc-objects/gcc
  • From: Paul Duquennoy <paul.duquennoy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Preserving GCOV coverage stats after program crash?
  • From: Simon Roberts <simon.roberts@xxxxxxxxxx>
• To Generate the pattern for sign_extended addition of 32 bit
  • From: Abhishek Roy <abhishek.roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: inline assembly functions - generated code
  • From: Robert Kiesling <kiesling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• inline assembly functions - generated code
  • From: Mike Welsen <mikewelsen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• __sync commands with 16 byte
  • From: "Roland Schulz" <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.x with Solaris before 2.9
  • From: Robert Kiesling <kiesling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• what are these errors/how do I get around them: sorry, unimplemented: inter-module optimisations not implemented yet
  • From: "Jim Stapleton" <stapleton.41@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: building with host=i686-pc-mingw32
  • From: David Gressett <jdgressett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc binary compatibility
  • From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc binary compatibility
  • From: "Alexey Skidanov" <alexey-s@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Problem about mips .data section
  • From: "robert song" <robertsong.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: GCC 4.x with Solaris before 2.9
  • From: "Rupert Wood" <me@xxxxxxxxx>
• Problems compiling gcc-4.2.2 in a IBM Power PC 970MP
  • From: Joan Josep Iglesias Blanch <joan.iglesias@xxxxxx>
• GCC 4.x with Solaris before 2.9
  • From: Robert Kiesling <kiesling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• building with host=i686-pc-mingw32
  • From: "Piotr Cychowski" <cycholka@xxxxx>
• Strange error with gcc:: Apologies
  • From: Lorenzo Pesce <lpesce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc binary comptibility
  • From: Philipp Thomas <philipp.thomas@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: undefined reference to vtable for xxx
  • From: Philipp Thomas <philipp.thomas@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is there another way to put functions to a specifed section?
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Is there another way to put functions to a specifed section?
  • From: "PRC" <panruochen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Problem moving module files to other directories
  • From: Lorenzo Pesce <lpesce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Problem building gcc4.2.2 on Solaris 10 for x64
  • From: Joe Pallas <pallas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Linking problems with gcc 4.2.2 and AIX 5.2
  • From: "Jonathan Saxton" <jsaxton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc for sh-linux: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
  • From: Michael Witten <mfwitten@xxxxxxx>
• Re: undefined builtin atomic operations in gcc4.2
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• undefined builtin atomic operations in gcc4.2
  • From: Juan Carlos Franzoy <jfranzoy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: conditional based transfer pattern issue in md file
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: undefined reference to vtable for xxx
  • From: "David H. Lynch Jr." <dhlii@xxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc for sh-linux: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
  • From: "Gerard Demm" <they.read.it@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• conditional based transfer pattern issue in md file
  • From: "Sivaprasad.pv" <sivaprasad.pv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Re: undefined reference to vtable for xxx
  • From: "David H. Lynch Jr." <dhlii@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc binary comptibility
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: gcc binary comptibility
  • From: "Alexey Skidanov" <alexey-s@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc binary comptibility
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: gcc binary comptibility
  • From: "Alexey Skidanov" <alexey-s@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc binary comptibility
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc binary comptibility
  • From: "Alexey Skidanov" <alexey-s@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Mangle functions
  • From: "Ron Kreymborg" <ron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: A question related to "-I" option of CPP (C preprocessor)
  • From: Tom St Denis <tstdenis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Mangle functions
  • From: Daniel Lohmann <daniel.lohmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Mangle functions
  • From: "Ron Kreymborg" <ron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• A question related to "-I" option of CPP (C preprocessor)
  • From: "jun yuan" <yuanjun.yuanjun@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Mangle functions
  • From: Daniel Lohmann <daniel.lohmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• sign_extended 32bit -addition
  • From: "Sivaprasad.pv" <sivaprasad.pv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: statically linked gcc executables
  • From: John Carter <john.carter@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building a cross-compiler
  • From: "Wenton L. Davis" <wenton@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: statically linked gcc executables
  • From: Ted Byers <r.ted.byers@xxxxxxxxxx>
• g77 compiler issues
  • From: Usha Govindarajulu <usha@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: statically linked gcc executables
  • From: "Angelo Leto" <angleto@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Tiny GCC: Pure, Unadulterated, Object Code
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: statically linked gcc executables
  • From: Ted Byers <r.ted.byers@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Tiny GCC: Pure, Unadulterated, Object Code
  • From: Michael Witten <mfwitten@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Tiny GCC: Pure, Unadulterated, Object Code
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Tiny GCC: Pure, Unadulterated, Object Code
  • From: Michael Witten <mfwitten@xxxxxxx>
• Re: statically linked gcc executables
  • From: "Angelo Leto" <angleto@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Tiny GCC: Pure, Unadulterated, Object Code
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Tiny GCC: Pure, Unadulterated, Object Code
  • From: Michael Witten <mfwitten@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Building a cross-compiler
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building a cross-compiler
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Tiny GCC: Pure, Unadulterated, Object Code
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Tiny GCC: Pure, Unadulterated, Object Code
  • From: Michael Witten <mfwitten@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Tiny GCC: Pure, Unadulterated, Object Code
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: statically linked gcc executables
  • From: Ted Byers <r.ted.byers@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Tiny GCC: Pure, Unadulterated, Object Code
  • From: Michael Witten <mfwitten@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Tiny GCC: Pure, Unadulterated, Object Code
  • From: Michael Witten <mfwitten@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Updating gcc on PPC with Leopard
  • From: Michael Witten <mfwitten@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Updating gcc on PPC with Leopard
  • From: "Matthias Schmidt" <beta@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Tiny GCC: Pure, Unadulterated, Object Code
  • From: John Carter <john.carter@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: statically linked gcc executables
  • From: John Carter <john.carter@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building a cross-compiler
  • From: John Carter <john.carter@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building a cross-compiler
  • From: "James Tebneff" <tebneff@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Building a cross-compiler
  • From: "Rupert Wood" <me@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building a cross-compiler
  • From: Michael Witten <mfwitten@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Building a cross-compiler
  • From: "Wenton L. Davis" <wenton@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building a cross-compiler
  • From: John Carter <john.carter@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Building a cross-compiler
  • From: "Wenton L. Davis" <wenton@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linking error with static templated member
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to control optimization of each function
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Tiny GCC: Pure, Unadulterated, Object Code
  • From: "Scott Moore" <smoore@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: undefined reference to vtable for xxx
  • From: Philipp Thomas <philipp.thomas@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem building gcc on solaris9: no rule to make target "all" in gcc-objects/gcc
  • From: Paul Duquennoy <paul.duquennoy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Mangle functions
  • From: Daniel Lohmann <daniel.lohmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: undefined reference to vtable for xxx
  • From: Rüdiger Ranft <_rdi_@xxxxxx>
• Re: Updating gcc on PPC with Leopard
  • From: Michael Witten <mfwitten@xxxxxxx>
• RE: Linking problems with gcc 4.2.2 and AIX 5.2
  • From: "Jonathan Saxton" <jsaxton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Linking problems with gcc 4.2.2 and AIX 5.2
  • From: Thomas Mittelstaedt <T.Mittelstaedt@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linking error with static templated member
  • From: "Akos Rajna" <akimaki23@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Mangle functions
  • From: "Ron Kreymborg" <ron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Mangle functions
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• How to control optimization of each function
  • From: scl <scl.sang@xxxxxxxxx>
• Updating gcc on PPC with Leopard
  • From: "Matthias Schmidt" <beta@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• undefined reference to vtable for xxx
  • From: "David H. Lynch Jr." <dhlii@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Mangle functions
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Mangle functions
  • From: Daniel Lohmann <daniel.lohmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem building gcc on solaris9: no rule to make target "all" in gcc-objects/gcc
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Problem building gcc on solaris9: no rule to make target "all" in gcc-objects/gcc
  • From: Paul Duquennoy <paul.duquennoy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem compiling gcc 4.2.1 on AIX 5.3
  • From: Anant S Athavale <asa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: undefined reference to vtable for xxx
  • From: Philipp Thomas <philipp.thomas@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why does gcc produce an unnecessary `nop' instruction?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Mangle functions
  • From: "Ron Kreymborg" <ron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• How to Properly Set a Tree Member Variable
  • From: "Tom Browder" <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why does gcc produce an unnecessary `nop' instruction?
  • From: Darryl Miles <darryl-mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Progress] Tiny GCC: Pure, Unadulterated, Object Code
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 32 vs 34 libraries
  • From: Tim Prince <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 32 vs 34 libraries
  • From: g-h-d <erwann.rogard@xxxxxxxxx>
• undefined reference to vtable for xxx
  • From: "David H. Lynch Jr." <dhlii@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Progress] Tiny GCC: Pure, Unadulterated, Object Code
  • From: Michael Witten <mfwitten@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Tiny GCC: Pure, Unadulterated, Object Code
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: inline assembly as PIC code?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 32 vs 34 libraries
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Progress] Tiny GCC: Pure, Unadulterated, Object Code
  • From: Michael Witten <mfwitten@xxxxxxx>
• Re: how could i get version of a library
  • From: 龙海涛 <longhaitao@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• inline assembly as PIC code?
  • From: Jim Marshall <jim.marshall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Progress] Tiny GCC: Pure, Unadulterated, Object Code
  • From: Michael Witten <mfwitten@xxxxxxx>
• Re: ICE on x86_64-pc-mingw32 / g++
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• ICE on x86_64-pc-mingw32 / g++
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• Linking problems with gcc 4.2.2 and AIX 5.2
  • From: "Jonathan Saxton" <jsaxton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: how could i get version of a library
  • From: "Timothy C Prince" <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why does gcc produce an unnecessary `nop' instruction?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Tiny GCC: Pure, Unadulterated, Object Code
  • From: Michael Witten <mfwitten@xxxxxxx>
• 32 vs 34 libraries
  • From: g-h-d <erwann.rogard@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why does gcc produce an unnecessary `nop' instruction?
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: statically linked gcc executables
  • From: "Angelo Leto" <angleto@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: statically linked gcc executables
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: statically linked gcc executables
  • From: "Angelo Leto" <angleto@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Re: Why does gcc produce an unnecessary `nop' instruction?
  • From: "PRC" <panruochen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why does gcc produce an unnecessary `nop' instruction?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: statically linked gcc executables
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Why does gcc produce an unnecessary `nop' instruction?
  • From: "PRC" <panruochen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Obtaining first argument in Objective C method without explicitly using self ?
  • From: Bjoern Kriews <bkr@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: statically linked gcc executables
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: statically linked gcc executables
  • From: "Angelo Leto" <angleto@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: statically linked gcc executables
  • From: "Angelo Leto" <angleto@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: install question
  • From: "Rupert Wood" <me@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: statically linked gcc executables
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• install question
  • From: jhanse51@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: statically linked gcc executables
  • From: Ted Byers <r.ted.byers@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: statically linked gcc executables
  • From: "Angelo Leto" <angleto@xxxxxxxxx>
• configure doesn't want to use the GNU linker
  • From: FX <fxcoudert@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Tiny GCC: Pure, Unadulterated, Object Code
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: statically linked gcc executables
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• statically linked gcc executables
  • From: "Angelo leto" <angleto@xxxxxxxxx>
• how could i get version of a library
  • From: 龙海涛 <longhaitao@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Extra semicolons in C++.
  • From: "Jason Cipriani" <jason.cipriani@xxxxxxxxx>
• Extra semicolons in C++.
  • From: "Jason Cipriani" <jason.cipriani@xxxxxxxxx>
• MIPS Cross compilation -ffreestanding option
  • From: Anitha Boyapati <anithab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: PowerPC implicit pass-by-reference for structs?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Tiny GCC: Pure, Unadulterated, Object Code
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Cortex-M3 Support
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• PowerPC implicit pass-by-reference for structs?
  • From: "Wealand, Barry" <barry.wealand@xxxxxxxx>
• Tiny GCC: Pure, Unadulterated, Object Code
  • From: Michael Witten <mfwitten@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Debugging Macros
  • From: "Tom Browder" <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Debugging Macros
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Debugging Macros
  • From: "Tom Browder" <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Cortex-M3 Support
  • From: ashishs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Library error message.
  • From: Peter Morgan <petermorgan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Passing (typedef_name *) args into (typedef_name const *) params produces warning if typedef_name is an array type
  • From: Hamzah Nassif <hamzahnassif@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Is 'long unsigned long' compliant to standard?
  • From: "Scott Moore" <smoore@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: set default rpath without using -specs?
  • From: Jason Pepas <cell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is 'long unsigned long' compliant to standard?
  • From: Tom St Denis <tstdenis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Is 'long unsigned long' compliant to standard?
  • From: "Scott Moore" <smoore@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is 'long unsigned long' compliant to standard?
  • From: "Zuxy Meng" <zuxy.meng@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is 'long unsigned long' compliant to standard?
  • From: Tom St Denis <tstdenis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Is 'long unsigned long' compliant to standard?
  • From: "Zuxy Meng" <zuxy.meng@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: unrecognized command line option "-c" and "-pipe"
  • From: "Fredrik Stridfeldt" <stridfeldt@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: unrecognized command line option "-c" and "-pipe"
  • From: Tom St Denis <tstdenis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: unrecognized command line option "-c" and "-pipe"
  • From: "Fredrik Stridfeldt" <stridfeldt@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: unrecognized command line option "-c" and "-pipe"
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• unrecognized command line option "-c" and "-pipe"
  • From: "Fredrik Stridfeldt" <stridfeldt@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g77 compiler
  • From: Tim Prince <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g77 compiler
  • From: "Tom Browder" <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• g77 compiler
  • From: Usha Govindarajulu <usha@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: warning: comparison with string literal results in unspecified behaviour
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: warning: comparison with string literal results in unspecified behaviour
  • From: Russell Shaw <rjshaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: warning: comparison with string literal results in unspecified behaviour
  • From: Russell Shaw <rjshaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: warning: comparison with string literal results in unspecified behaviour
  • From: Russell Shaw <rjshaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: warning: comparison with string literal results in unspecified behaviour
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Library error message.
  • From: Tim Prince <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Library error message.
  • From: Peter Morgan <petermorgan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: warning: comparison with string literal results in unspecified behaviour
  • From: Russell Shaw <rjshaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• expr_no_commas
  • From: polina <pdudnik@xxxxxxxxx>
• build_modify_expr
  • From: polina <pdudnik@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: warning: comparison with string literal results in unspecified behaviour
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Library error message.
  • From: Tim Prince <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• warning: comparison with string literal results in unspecified behaviour
  • From: Russell Shaw <rjshaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Library error message.
  • From: Peter Morgan <petermorgan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: merging with binutils + some bootstrap questions
  • From: MiKRO <miro.kropacek@xxxxxxxxx>
• How to Include kernel macros in a program and compile through GCC Options
  • From: karimas@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Reducing compilation memory usage
  • From: Alejandro Pulver <alepulver@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How can I get help about modifying the gcc code?
  • From: Philipp Thomas <philipp.thomas@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Reducing compilation memory usage
  • From: Tom St Denis <tstdenis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Reducing compilation memory usage
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compatibility between g++ 4.1 and 4.2
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• alignment/padding when mixing C struct and fortran 90 derived type
  • From: burlen <burlen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Reducing compilation memory usage
  • From: Tony Wetmore <tony.wetmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Reducing compilation memory usage
  • From: Alejandro Pulver <alepulver@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• How can I get help about modifying the gcc code?
  • From: "Ruan Beihong" <ruanbeihong@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem compiling gcc 4.2.1 on AIX 5.3
  • From: Thomas Mittelstaedt <T.Mittelstaedt@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Reducing compilation memory usage
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: libgcc_s.so.1 for IRIX
  • From: Thomas Mittelstaedt <T.Mittelstaedt@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Compatibility between g++ 4.1 and 4.2
  • From: Stuart Brooks <stuartb@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem compiling gcc 4.2.1 on AIX 5.3
  • From: Kai Ruottu <karuottu@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem compiling gcc 4.2.1 on AIX 5.3
  • From: Kai Ruottu <karuottu@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem compiling gcc 4.2.1 on AIX 5.3
  • From: Anant Athavale <asa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• set default rpath without using -specs?
  • From: Jason Pepas <cell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Reducing compilation memory usage
  • From: Alejandro Pulver <alepulver@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Reducing compilation memory usage
  • From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Reducing compilation memory usage
  • From: Tony Wetmore <tony.wetmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Reducing compilation memory usage
  • From: Alejandro Pulver <alepulver@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• libgcc_s.so.1 for IRIX
  • From: joao@xxxxxxx
• RE: Reducing compilation memory usage
  • From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• struct member detection
  • From: MShura <shura_mam@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Reducing compilation memory usage
  • From: Alejandro Pulver <alepulver@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Reducing compilation memory usage
  • From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem compiling gcc 4.2.1 on AIX 5.3
  • From: Anant S Athavale <asa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem compiling gcc 4.2.1 on AIX 5.3
  • From: Kai Ruottu <karuottu@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem compiling gcc 4.2.1 on AIX 5.3
  • From: Thomas Mittelstaedt <T.Mittelstaedt@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Problem compiling gcc 4.2.1 on AIX 5.3
  • From: Anant Athavale <asa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Failed bootstrap on mainline on powerpc-apple-darwin7.9.0
  • From: Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reducing compilation memory usage
  • From: Alejandro Pulver <alepulver@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Gcc Configure System
  • From: "Tom Browder" <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Long double problem and -funsafe-math-optimizations
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Gcc Configure System
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Running the testsuite using a different compiler
  • From: "Rupert Wood" <me@xxxxxxxxx>
• Long double problem and -funsafe-math-optimizations
  • From: "Case Taintor" <casetaintor@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can not declare std::map::iterator in template (error: expected `;' before "my_A_iterator")
  • From: William Gallafent <william@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Can not declare std::map::iterator in template (error: expected `;' before "my_A_iterator")
  • From: Erik <sigra@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Gcc Configure System
  • From: Tim Prince <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Gcc Configure System
  • From: "Tom Browder" <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to use VFP instructions on ARM
  • From: Dorit Nuzman <DORIT@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Vector data types in fortran
  • From: Dorit Nuzman <DORIT@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Gcc Configure System
  • From: "Tom Browder" <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Please help with these two errors
  • From: mahmoodn <nt_mahmood@xxxxxxxxx>
• Running the testsuite using a different compiler
  • From: Kristis Makris <kristis.makris@xxxxxxx>
• Re: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code
  • From: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxx>
• ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code
  • From: "Rodrigo Dominguez" <roddomi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Please help with these two errors
  • From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Please help with these two errors
  • From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Please help with these two errors
  • From: mahmoodn <nt_mahmood@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Please help with these two errors
  • From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Please help with these two errors
  • From: mahmoodn <nt_mahmood@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Please help with these two errors
  • From: mahmoodn <nt_mahmood@xxxxxxxxx>
• gnatbind error
  • From: "Kaplan Cem EREN" <kceren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Correct way to terminate executable testcase for testsuite?
  • From: Andrew Hutchinson <andrewhutchinson@xxxxxxx>
• RE: Please help with these two errors
  • From: "Jonathan Saxton" <jsaxton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Vector data types in fortran
  • From: burlen <burlen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Gcc 4.2.2 build failure (fixincludes breaks limits.h)
  • From: Kristian Van Der Vliet <vanders@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Please help with these two errors
  • From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: where gcc -save-temps puts temporary files
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RESOLVED] gcc 4.2.2 fails to compile file on aix 5.2 with "cc1plus: out of memory allocating", works without optimization
  • From: Thomas Mittelstaedt <T.Mittelstaedt@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: OpenMP+gfortran performance extremely variable between dlopen's of libgomp
  • From: Nick Maclaren <nmm1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Please help with these two errors
  • From: mahmoodn <nt_mahmood@xxxxxxxxx>
• OpenMP+gfortran performance extremely variable between dlopen's of libgomp
  • From: "Anand Patil" <anand.prabhakar.patil@xxxxxxxxx>
• where gcc -save-temps puts temporary files
  • From: "Marty Leisner" <leisner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Please help with these two errors
  • From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Please help with these two errors
  • From: mahmoodn <nt_mahmood@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gfortran 4.2 with openMP: why no speedup?
  • From: Tim Prince <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gfortran 4.2 with openMP: why no speedup?
  • From: Tim Prince <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gfortran 4.2 with openMP: why no speedup?
  • From: "Anand Patil" <anand.prabhakar.patil@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gfortran 4.2 with openMP: why no speedup?
  • From: "Anand Patil" <anand.prabhakar.patil@xxxxxxxxx>
• __bss_start not correct
  • From: "Yi Tang" <yitang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 64-Bit Operator Overloading Adventure
  • From: "Jonathan Wakely" <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gfortran 4.2 with openMP: why no speedup?
  • From: Tim Prince <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• gfortran 4.2 with openMP: why no speedup?
  • From: "Anand Patil" <anand.prabhakar.patil@xxxxxxxxx>
• generation of abstract syntax trees
  • From: krischan83 <christian.schneider.privat@xxxxxxx>
• 64-Bit Operator Overloading Adventure
  • From: "Brian D. McGrew" <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: g++ Compiler help...
  • From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Fwd: g++ Compiler help...
  • From: "Pramod R Teewaree" <pramod.teewaree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: how to warn on unused preprocessor defines...
  • From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: how to warn on unused preprocessor defines...
  • From: Marc Weber <marco-oweber@xxxxxx>
• is there a way to turn off the "-fassociative-math disabled" warning?
  • From: Miles Bader <miles.bader@xxxxxxxxx>
• building gcc-4.2.2 on IRIX6.5 SGI
  • From: Myhuong Nguyen <Myhuong.Nguyen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: how to warn on unused preprocessor defines...
  • From: Tony Wetmore <tony.wetmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Resolved] how to warn on unused preprocessor defines...
  • From: "charlie" <uber@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: how to warn on unused preprocessor defines...
  • From: "charlie" <uber@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: how to warn on unused preprocessor defines...
  • From: "Andrew Bell" <andrew.bell.ia@xxxxxxxxx>
• how to warn on unused preprocessor defines...
  • From: "charlie" <uber@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Build Bug In gcc-4.1.2
  • From: milady <kami_amaterasu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• merging all stl containers of pointer objects
  • From: Aliesha Finkel <agfinkel@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to traceback call stack on MIPS arch?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• basic queries regarding wchar_t
  • From: "Shoaib Naazir" <shoaib.naazir@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Resolved: Problem building gcc-4.2.2 64-bit on hp-ux 11.11, more problems, SUCCESS
  • From: Thomas Mittelstaedt <T.Mittelstaedt@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCJ .jar to .so with native method
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCJ .jar to .so with native method
  • From: Joe Hoffert <jhoffert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: cast of float to unsigned char bug on ARM with 3.4.5 - when was it fixed?
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: a question about code optimization
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: cast of float to unsigned char bug on ARM with 3.4.5 - when was it fixed?
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc 4.2.2 fails to compile file on aix 5.2 with "cc1plus: out of memory allocating", works without optimization
  • From: Thomas Mittelstaedt <T.Mittelstaedt@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Re: How to traceback call stack on MIPS arch?
  • From: "PRC" <panruochen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: a question about code optimization
  • From: 龙海涛 <longhaitao@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: a question about code optimization
  • From: 龙海涛 <longhaitao@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• cast of float to unsigned char bug on ARM with 3.4.5 - when was it fixed?
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Similar tools builds show markedly different performance?
  • From: Rick Mann <rmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Similar tools builds show markedly different performance?
  • From: Rick Mann <rmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to traceback call stack on MIPS arch?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to traceback call stack on MIPS arch?
  • From: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Gnu C++ & Open MP
  • From: burlen <burlen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Gnu C++ & Open MP
  • From: Tom St Denis <tstdenis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Gnu C++ & Open MP
  • From: burlen <burlen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Gnu C++ & Open MP
  • From: burlen <bloring@xxxxxxx>
• Re: How to traceback call stack on MIPS arch?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Mixing obejects Built on RHEL 3.0 and RHEL 4.0 using same gcc4.1.2
  • From: "satyaakam goswami" <satyaakam@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Errors when building powerpc-softfloat-linux-gnu libgfrotran
  • From: "Bob Yan" <ccrg.yang@xxxxxxxxx>
• How to traceback call stack on MIPS arch?
  • From: "PRC" <panruochen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Errors when building powerpc-softfloat-linux-gnu libgfrotran
  • From: Kai Ruottu <karuottu@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Errors when building powerpc-softfloat-linux-gnu libgfrotran
  • From: Kai Ruottu <karuottu@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.2.2 failed on Mac Power G4 running Leopard
  • From: Andreas Tobler <andreast-list@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Errors when building powerpc-softfloat-linux-gnu libgfrotran
  • From: "Bob Yan" <ccrg.yang@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: libbind troubles
  • From: "Diego ." <eljedi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: libbind troubles
  • From: Tom St Denis <tstdenis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• libbind troubles
  • From: "Diego ." <eljedi@xxxxxxxxx>
• How to use VFP instructions on ARM
  • From: Tom Cooksey <thomas.cooksey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question on effort to port Diab Tools developed Power PC 405 assembly source to GNU
  • From: Fabian Cenedese <Cenedese@xxxxxxxx>
• Errors when building powerpc-softfloat-linux-gnu libgfrotran
  • From: "Bob Yan" <ccrg.yang@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: top-level configure options, --help
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• x86_64, libgfortran: unrecognized file format (was: for Daniel)
  • From: Daniel Franke <franke.daniel@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc-4.2.2 failed on Mac Power G4 running Leopard
  • From: doesNotMatter DoesNotMatter <hijingfly@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: top-level configure options, --help
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Writing past the 2GB file size boundary on 32-bit systems
  • From: Nick Maclaren <nmm1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: top-level configure options, --help
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Writing past the 2GB file size boundary on 32-bit systems
  • From: "D. R. Evans" <doc.evans@xxxxxxxxx>
• libgmp, libmpfr, RPATH, RUNPATH, LD_LIBRARY_PATH and gcc build options
  • From: "Poor Yorick" <org.gnu.gcc.help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: cannot build gcc 3.2.3 in Suse 10.3 (gcc 4.2.1)
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Writing past the 2GB file size boundary on 32-bit systems
  • From: "D. R. Evans" <N7DR@xxxxxxxx>
• Problems building bi-arch compiler
  • From: "Udo A. Steinberg" <us15@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: cannot build gcc 3.2.3 in Suse 10.3 (gcc 4.2.1)
  • From: Tim Prince <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: cannot build gcc 3.2.3 in Suse 10.3 (gcc 4.2.1)
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: cannot build gcc 3.2.3 in Suse 10.3 (gcc 4.2.1)
  • From: "Matteo Rama" <matteo.rama@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: cannot build gcc 3.2.3 in Suse 10.3 (gcc 4.2.1)
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• cannot build gcc 3.2.3 in Suse 10.3 (gcc 4.2.1)
  • From: "Matteo Rama" <matteo.rama@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Dynamic Libraryes, C++ and Objective-C
  • From: "Lawrence Crowl" <crowl@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Question on effort to port Diab Tools developed Power PC 405 assembly source to GNU
  • From: "David W. Goble" <dgoble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RB Tree performance aspects in a map
  • From: Anitha Boyapati <anithab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• how to add RPATH and RUNPATH to gcc binaries themselves
  • From: "Poor Yorick" <org.gnu.gcc.help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: building gcc compiler --target=x86_64
  • From: Tim Prince <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: a question about code optimization
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• insert seed bugs to gcc
  • From: "Paul Li" <paulur@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc option -fminimal-toc related
  • From: "manjunath k" <kmanjunat@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: function arguments are passed in registers
  • From: "Zheng Da" <zhengda1936@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: function arguments are passed in registers
  • From: Greg Smith <gsmith@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: function arguments are passed in registers
  • From: "Zheng Da" <zhengda1936@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: a question about code optimization
  • From: 龙海涛 <longhaitao@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: top-level configure options, --help
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: top-level configure options, --help
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: function arguments are passed in registers
  • From: Tom St Denis <tstdenis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: function arguments are passed in registers
  • From: "Zheng Da" <zhengda1936@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Supress macro expansion
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: function arguments are passed in registers
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• function arguments are passed in registers
  • From: "Zheng Da" <zhengda1936@xxxxxxxxx>
• Supress macro expansion
  • From: vsdeepthi <shobhadeepthi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Dynamic Libraryes, C++ and Objective-C
  • From: "Bruno Moreira Guedes" <thbmatrix@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compile gcc from source on a 64 bit OS ?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Optimizations documentation
  • From: Tim Prince <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [gnat] Where did pragma CPP_Destructor go?
  • From: Oliver Kellogg <okellogg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compile gcc from source on a 64 bit OS ?
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compile gcc from source on a 64 bit OS ?
  • From: Tim Prince <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Fixed-point operations
  • From: Ted Byers <r.ted.byers@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Re: Fixed-point operations
  • From: "Cristea Bogdan" <cristeab@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Re: Fixed-point operations
  • From: "Tom St Denis" <tstdenis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Fixed-point operations
  • From: "Cristea Bogdan" <cristeab@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: cc1plus take too much memory
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: cc1plus take too much memory
  • From: mahmoodn <nt_mahmood@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Fixed-point operations
  • From: Tom St Denis <tstdenis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Fixed-point operations
  • From: Maurizio Vitale <maurizio.vitale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: building gcc compiler --target=x86_64
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• building gcc compiler --target=x86_64
  • From: "tsah marco" <tsahmarco@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Fixed-point operations
  • From: Tom St Denis <tstdenis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: cc1plus take too much memory
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Fixed-point operations
  • From: "Cristea Bogdan" <cristeab@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: cc1plus take too much memory
  • From: mahmoodn <nt_mahmood@xxxxxxxxx>
• SIMD types and aliasing rules
  • From: Lorenz Minder <lminder@xxxxxxx>
• Re: cc1plus take too much memory
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compile gcc from source on a 64 bit OS ?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: cc1plus take too much memory
  • From: mahmoodn <nt_mahmood@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compile gcc from source on a 64 bit OS ?
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: cc1plus take too much memory
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• cc1plus take too much memory
  • From: mahmoodn <nt_mahmood@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: where is the error??
  • From: mahmoodn <nt_mahmood@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: where is the error??
  • From: "Tom Browder" <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: where is the error??
  • From: Tim Stahlhut <stahta01@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: where is the error??
  • From: mahmoodn <nt_mahmood@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: where is the error??
  • From: "Tom Browder" <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• where is the error??
  • From: mahmoodn <nt_mahmood@xxxxxxxxx>
• top-level configure options, --help
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: configure: error: No support for this target/host combination.
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Another Gcc 4.2.2 Bug
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• FW: Makefile help request (config file)
  • From: Robert Wong <subdriver97@xxxxxxxxx>
• Makefile help request (config file)
  • From: Robert Wong <subdriver97@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: configure: error: No support for this target/host combination.
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Another Gcc 4.2.2 Bug
  • From: Thomas Dineen <tdineen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: configure: error: No support for this target/host combination.
  • From: "Yang" <lx4r2qw02@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Gcc Patch Archive?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Gcc Patch Archive?
  • From: Thomas Dineen <tdineen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: configure: error: No support for this target/host combination.
  • From: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen <rask@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: configure: error: No support for this target/host combination.
  • From: "Yang" <lx4r2qw02@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: configure: error: No support for this target/host combination.
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compile gcc from source on a 64 bit OS ?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: configure: error: No support for this target/host combination.
  • From: "Yang" <lx4r2qw02@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: configure: error: No support for this target/host combination.
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: configure: error: No support for this target/host combination.
  • From: "Yang" <lx4r2qw02@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compile gcc from source on a 64 bit OS ?
  • From: "Dennis Clarke" <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question: How dose Gcc choose which Ld and As to use?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compile gcc from source on a 64 bit OS ?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compile gcc from source on a 64 bit OS ?
  • From: "Dennis Clarke" <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Compile gcc from source on a 64 bit OS ?
  • From: "Hsieh, Pei-Ying (MED US)" <pei-ying.hsieh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: help compiling GCC in Fedora 8
  • From: Thomas Dineen <tdineen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: help compiling GCC in Fedora 8
  • From: "tsah marco" <tsahmarco@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: help compiling GCC in Fedora 8
  • From: "tsah marco" <tsahmarco@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: help compiling GCC in Fedora 8
  • From: "tsah marco" <tsahmarco@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem building gcc on ia64-hpux machine
  • From: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen <rask@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question On Testsuite 12/22/07
  • From: Tim Prince <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: An error when trying to gmake install GCC 3.4.6: gmake: *** [install-target-libf2c] Error 2
  • From: Alex Man <alexman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: An error when trying to gmake install GCC 3.4.6: gmake: *** [install-target-libf2c] Error 2
  • From: Alex Man <alexman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• configure: error: No support for this target/host combination.
  • From: "Yang" <lx4r2qw02@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: a question about code optimization
  • From: 龙海涛 <longhaitao@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help with building/using GCC cross compiler to AIX 5.2
  • From: "Jeff Heisz" <jmheisz@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Re: Can `cpp' strip off comments in C source code?
  • From: Robert Kiesling <kiesling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Re: Can `cpp' strip off comments in C source code?
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Re: Can `cpp' strip off comments in C source code?
  • From: "PRC" <panruochen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can `cpp' strip off comments in C source code?
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• Can `cpp' strip off comments in C source code?
  • From: "PRC" <panruochen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Cross-build for x86_64-pc-mingw32
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: I can not resolve "error: conflicting types for... "
  • From: mahmoodn <nt_mahmood@xxxxxxxxx>
• Question On Testsuite 12/22/07
  • From: Thomas Dineen <tdineen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem building gcc-4.2.2 64-bit on hp-ux 11.11, more problems, SUCCESS
  • From: Thomas Dineen <tdineen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Question: How dose Gcc choose which Ld and As to use?
  • From: Thomas Dineen <tdineen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Another Gcc-4.1.2 Bug On Solaris 9 12/20/07
  • From: Thomas Dineen <tdineen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: need an explanation on assembly generated by various GCC releases
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: More questions on sysroots
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: More questions on sysroots
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: More questions on sysroots
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• need an explanation on assembly generated by various GCC releases
  • From: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: I can not resolve "error: conflicting types for... "
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: void pointer and map (fwd)
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: An error when trying to gmake install GCC 3.4.6: gmake: *** [install-target-libf2c] Error 2
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: a question about code optimization
  • From: Christoph Bartoschek <bartoschek@xxxxxx>
• I can not resolve "error: conflicting types for... "
  • From: mahmoodn <nt_mahmood@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: I can not compile under Ubuntu with gcc 3.3... (?)
  • From: mahmoodn <nt_mahmood@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: void pointer and map (fwd)
  • From: Ted Byers <r.ted.byers@xxxxxxxxxx>
• a question about code optimization
  • From: 龙海涛 <longhaitao@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: void pointer and map (fwd)
  • From: Anitha Boyapati <anithab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: An error when trying to gmake install GCC 3.4.6: gmake: *** [install-target-libf2c] Error 2
  • From: "Dennis Clarke" <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: An error when trying to gmake install GCC 3.4.6: gmake: *** [install-target-libf2c] Error 2
  • From: Alex Man <alexman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: An error when trying to gmake install GCC 3.4.6: gmake: *** [install-target-libf2c] Error 2
  • From: "Dennis Clarke" <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• An error when trying to gmake install GCC 3.4.6: gmake: *** [install-target-libf2c] Error 2
  • From: alexman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: system() call causes gcc-x64 profiling to crash
  • From: Vincent Diepeveen <diep@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: More questions on sysroots
  • From: "Kaz Kylheku" <kaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Initialization of a static member of a template class fails
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Initialization of a static member of a template class fails
  • From: Valery Jean-Michel <Jean-Michel.Valery@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: void pointer and map
  • From: jlh <jlh@xxxxxx>
• Re: void pointer and map (fwd)
  • From: Ted Byers <r.ted.byers@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: void pointer and map (fwd)
  • From: Anitha Boyapati <anithab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: void pointer and map (fwd)
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• void pointer and map (fwd)
  • From: Anitha Boyapati <anithab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• void pointer and map
  • From: Anitha Boyapati <anithab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Another Gcc-4.1.2 Bug On Solaris 9 12/20/07
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: More questions on sysroots
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• Another Gcc-4.1.2 Bug On Solaris 9 12/20/07
  • From: Thomas Dineen <tdineen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: inline assembly and segment registers
  • From: Mihai Donțu <mihai.dontu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Help with building/using GCC cross compiler to AIX 5.2
  • From: "Jeff Heisz" <jmheisz@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: More questions on sysroots
  • From: "Kaz Kylheku" <kaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Bootstrapping gcc-4.2.2 with binutils-2.18
  • From: "Vin Shelton" <acs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• inline assembly and segment registers
  • From: Mihai Donțu <mihai.dontu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Multiple names for gcc inline assembly constraints?
  • From: Eric Sedlar <esedlar@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem building gcc-4.2.2 64-bit on hp-ux 11.11, more problems, SUCCESS
  • From: Thomas Mittelstaedt <T.Mittelstaedt@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem building gcc-4.2.2 on 64-bit ubuntu linux, SUCCESS!!
  • From: Thomas Mittelstaedt <T.Mittelstaedt@xxxxxxxxxx>
• problem in compiling bootstrap gcc 4.2.2
  • From: "mojtaba s" <kernelppc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: system() call causes gcc-x64 profiling to crash
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem building gcc 4.2.2 on SunOS 5.9, resolved
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• system() call causes gcc-x64 profiling to crash
  • From: Vincent Diepeveen <diep@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem building gcc 4.2.2 on SunOS 5.9, resolved
  • From: Thomas Mittelstaedt <T.Mittelstaedt@xxxxxxxxxx>
• file not found when compiling gcc under AIX 5.3
  • From: "Eric Fernandez" <efernandez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem building gcc-4.2.2 64-bit on hp-ux 11.11, more problems
  • From: Listaccount <lst_hoe01@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem building gcc-4.2.2 64-bit on hp-ux 11.11, more problems
  • From: Thomas Mittelstaedt <T.Mittelstaedt@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem building gcc-4.2.2 on 64-bit ubuntu linux
  • From: Fabian Cenedese <Cenedese@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem building gcc-4.2.2 on 64-bit ubuntu linux
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem building gcc-4.2.2 on 64-bit ubuntu linux
  • From: Tim Prince <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• More questions on sysroots
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC does not build gfortran !!
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC does not build gfortran !!
  • From: Martin Krischik <krischik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Bizarre behavior with various __attribute__s
  • From: Angus <angus@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem building gcc-4.2.2 on 64-bit ubuntu linux
  • From: Thomas Mittelstaedt <T.Mittelstaedt@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem building gcc-4.2.2 on 64-bit ubuntu linux
  • From: Kai Ruottu <karuottu@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem building gcc-4.2.2 on 64-bit ubuntu linux
  • From: Thomas Mittelstaedt <T.Mittelstaedt@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem building gcc-4.2.2 on 64-bit ubuntu linux
  • From: Kai Ruottu <karuottu@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem building gcc-4.2.2 on 64-bit ubuntu linux
  • From: Thomas Mittelstaedt <T.Mittelstaedt@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Two questions of gcc testing
  • From: Tim Prince <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem building gcc-4.2.2 on 64-bit ubuntu linux
  • From: Thomas Mittelstaedt <T.Mittelstaedt@xxxxxxxxxx>
• -pg profiling instrumentation question
  • From: Juan Carlos Franzoy <jfranzoy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>