Re: Curious global variable bug? Bad assumptions on my part?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks for the fast and detailed responses. Figured it was my
assumptions on multi-threaded C.

Thanks,
Tynan

On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Tony Wetmore
<tony.wetmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Tynan Wilke wrote:
>  > So, the -O0 is doing what I would expect, but the -O1 version IS
>  > testing the global variable the first pass, but then never jumping
>  > back to the 0x0804853a to retrieve the new global value and then
>  > re-test. Is this right?
>
>  That sounds right.  Because GCC thinks the value is never going to
>  change, it doesn't ever bother to look at it again after the first check.
>
>  --
>  Tony Wetmore
>
>
>

[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux