On Jan 25, 2008 11:39 AM, Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Angelo Leto wrote: > > On Jan 24, 2008 7:53 PM, Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> I do sympathize, but I think you're doing the wrong thing. Yes, you are > >> going to have to have two versions of your gcc binaries, one with > >> ld-linux.so.2 and one with ld-linux.so.1, but that should be all. > > > > no, there are diffences in symbols between the ld-linux.so.2 coming > > from libc6 2.3.6 (debian 4.0) and the > > ld-linux.so.2 coming e.g. from gentoo > > > (http://distfiles.gentoo.org/distfiles/glibc-2.6.1.tar.bz2) but the > > same thing append also with a newer debian version. > > This difference may be due to different building flags, patches .... > > Indeed. > > Ian Taylor's suggestion of a chroot is sound, because it solves all of the > library and include file problems too. You would have a complete environment > that you could move around. > > Anyway, it now sounds like you have something that works for you. yes, thanks. Angelo > > Andrew. >
