Re: Convention about jump ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrew Haley wrote:
Antoine Eiche wrote:

I would like to know if it exists a convention about the assembly generation of jump statement. More precisely, I would like to know if it's possible to find a jump which jumps to another function (the address of the jump is not an address which belongs of the current function) . I think we can write this kind of jump in assembly. But, does Gcc product this kind of jump ?

Yes, for sibcalls.
A sibcall is used when we don't need the result of a function call (tail recursion for instance) . Is it right ? If it, does a sibcall branch to another instruction than the first of a function ?

I have search documentation about that, but I've not found interesting paper.
Have you got some links ?

What's the problem?
It 's not really a problem, it's more for information.

Thanks,
Antoine

[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux