Re: Curious global variable bug? Bad assumptions on my part?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tynan Wilke wrote:
Thanks for the quick response.

I looked at the assembly code, and found it a bit strange. Here are
the two while loops in comparison:
while ( g_counter == 0 );
-O0
0x08048567 <main+102>:  mov    0x80497f8,%eax
0x0804856c <main+107>:  test   %eax,%eax
0x0804856e <main+109>:  je     0x8048567 <main+102>

-O1
0x0804853a <main+102>:  mov    0x80497f8,%eax
0x0804853f <main+107>:  test   %eax,%eax
0x08048541 <main+109>:  je     0x8048541 <main+109>    <--- jumping to
itself, so only testing the first time through

So, the -O0 is doing what I would expect, but the -O1 version IS
testing the global variable the first pass, but then never jumping
back to the 0x0804853a to retrieve the new global value and then
re-test. Is this right?

Yes.  Since the global variable is not changed in the loop, it's not
necessary to look at it again.

Andrew.

[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux