Is 'long unsigned long' compliant to standard?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Is 'long unsigned long' compliant to standard?
From: "Zuxy Meng" <zuxy.meng@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:24:47 +0800
Reply-to: "Zuxy Meng" <zuxy.meng@xxxxxxxxx>

Hi Gurus,

GCC accepts it without any warning, but could anybody confirm it's guaranteed to work on any compliant compiler?

-- 
Zuxy

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Is 'long unsigned long' compliant to standard?
  - From: Scott Moore
- Re: Is 'long unsigned long' compliant to standard?
  - From: Tom St Denis

Prev by Date: Re: unrecognized command line option "-c" and "-pipe"
Next by Date: Re: Is 'long unsigned long' compliant to standard?
Previous by thread: unrecognized command line option "-c" and "-pipe"
Next by thread: Re: Is 'long unsigned long' compliant to standard?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux