A newbie gcc builder here.
I?ve found reports of similar problems from a year or so back but no real
resolution so I have to ask again.
Recently I used gcc 4.0.0 to compile gcc 4.2.2 on AIX 5.2. Compiler seems
to work fine until I go to link something, then I get some fairly basic STL
things unresolved. My test program is taken from the introductory chapters
of C++ Template Metaprogramming by Abrahams & Gurtovoy.
#include <iostream>
template <unsigned long N>
struct binary
{
static unsigned const long value =
binary<N/10>::value * 2 + N%10;
};
template <>
struct binary<0>
{
static unsigned const long value = 0L;
};
int main()
{
std::cout
<< "The answer to the question of Life, the Universe and Everything
is "
<< binary<101010>::value
<< std::endl;
}
The command ?g++ -o demo422 demo422.cpp? yields six link errors:
$ g++ -o demo422 demo422.cpp
ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .std::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::size() const
ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .std::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::operator[](unsigned long)
const
ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .std::basic_ostream<char,
std::char_traits<char> >& std::operator<< <std::char_traits<char>
>(std::basic_ostream<char, std::char_traits<char> >&, char const*)
ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .std::basic_ostream<char,
std::char_traits<char> >::operator<<(unsigned long)
ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: std::basic_ostream<char,
std::char_traits<char> >& std::endl<char, std::char_traits<char>
>(std::basic_ostream<char, std::char_traits<char> >&)
ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .std::basic_ostream<char,
std::char_traits<char> >::operator<<(std::basic_ostream<char,
std::char_traits<char> >& (*)(std::basic_ostream<char,
std::char_traits<char> >&))
ld: 0711-345 Use the -bloadmap or -bnoquiet option to obtain more
information.
collect2: ld returned 8 exit status
Adding ?Wl,-bnoquiet doesn?t really give anything that seems particularly
helpful (well, to me, anyway) but using the ?v flag suggests that the
correct libstdc++.a is being found and also shows the (rather minimal) way I
configured gcc 4.2.2 when I built it.
$ g++ -v -o demo422 demo422.cpp
Using built-in specs.
Target: powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0
Configured with: /home.local/jsaxton/gcc-4.2.2/configure
--prefix=/opt/freeware : (reconfigured)
/home.local/jsaxton/gcc-4.2.2/configure --prefix=/opt/freeware
--enable-languages=c,c++
Thread model: aix
gcc version 4.2.2
/opt/freeware/libexec/gcc/powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0/4.2.2/cc1plus -quiet -v
-D_ALL_SOURCE demo422.cpp -quiet -dumpbase demo422.cpp -auxbase demo422
-version -o /tmp//ccPpunCt.s
ignoring nonexistent directory
"/opt/freeware/lib/gcc/powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0/4.2.2/../../../../powerpc-ibm-
aix5.2.0.0/include"
#include "..." search starts here:
#include <...> search starts here:
/opt/freeware/lib/gcc/powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0/4.2.2/../../../../include/c++/
4.2.2
/opt/freeware/lib/gcc/powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0/4.2.2/../../../../include/c++/
4.2.2/powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0
/opt/freeware/lib/gcc/powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0/4.2.2/../../../../include/c++/
4.2.2/backward
/usr/local/include
/opt/freeware/include
/opt/freeware/lib/gcc/powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0/4.2.2/include
/usr/include
End of search list.
GNU C++ version 4.2.2 (powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0)
compiled by GNU C version 4.2.2.
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param ggc-min-heapsize=32768
Compiler executable checksum: 757566dd4c47f91799c975df3ba00055
as -u -mppc -o /tmp//ccRMMUUA.o /tmp//ccPpunCt.s
/opt/freeware/libexec/gcc/powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0/4.2.2/collect2
-bpT:0x10000000 -bpD:0x20000000 -btextro -bnodelcsect -o demo422 /lib/crt0.o
-L/opt/freeware/lib/gcc/powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0/4.2.2
-L/opt/freeware/lib/gcc/powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0/4.2.2/../../..
/tmp//ccRMMUUA.o -lstdc++ -lm -lgcc_s
/opt/freeware/lib/gcc/powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0/4.2.2/libgcc.a -lc -lgcc_s
/opt/freeware/lib/gcc/powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0/4.2.2/libgcc.a
(At this point the error messages shown earlier are displayed so I didn?t
bother to include them again.)
If my double-dot counting is correct, the library path devolves to
/opt/freeware/lib and there are four libstc++.a files thereunder, all
freshly created by the install. I cannot see any trace of any library left
over from 4.0.0.
2008-01-25 16:15:01 nextferry:/opt/freeware/lib
$ find . -name libstdc++.a
./pthread/ppc64/libstdc++.a
./pthread/libstdc++.a
./ppc64/libstdc++.a
./libstdc++.a
I?m a bit stuck.
If I really need to rebuild gcc with different configuration options then
with a bit of work I can do that. Meanwhile ?which ld? yields /usr/lbin/ld
which is a symlink to the native AIX linker (/usr/ccs/buin/ld). There is no
gcc version of ld anywhere. It is my understanding that this is correct for
AIX 5.x.
Advice eagerly sought. I can generate the ?bnoquiet output if needed but
this is already a very long message.
