Hi, "Tom St Denis" <tstdenis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 写入消息新闻:4795F04C.6020105@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Zuxy Meng wrote: >> Hi Gurus, >> >> GCC accepts it without any warning, but could anybody confirm it's guaranteed to work on any compliant compiler? >> > > I don't know what C99 says, but why not just use the standard "unsigned > long long" since it's easier to read and guaranteed to be accepted by > any C99 compiler and most C89 compilers too. Thanks Tom. I myself only use 'unsigned long long'. I'm just unsure whether the other form should be considered buggy. -- Zuxy
