>Run the program you were trying to compile through "gcc -E". How big >is the resulting text? Are there any particularly long functions in >your program? That kind of thing. I have long functions with many typedefs. Have they any effect? in the directory than contain makefile, the result of "gcc -E" is: [naderan@Milky-way VVc_diagram_2]$ gcc -E gcc: no input files I use "make" instead to compile the project. what should I do then? Andrew Haley wrote: > > mahmoodn writes: > > > > > gcc 3.3 (released May 2003) is no longer being developed. Anything > > > it does today it will always do. > > > > I will work around with my code to get it ready for newer versions of > gcc, > > but untill then: > > > > > We don't know if this is abnormal because we don't know what you > > > were trying to compile. > > > > what information should I provide? > > Run the program you were trying to compile through "gcc -E". How big > is the resulting text? Are there any particularly long functions in > your program? That kind of thing. > > But I don't know how pointful this will be, given that gcc 3.3 is no > longer being developed. > > Andrew. > > -- > Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, > Berkshire, SL4 1TE, UK > Registered in England and Wales No. 3798903 > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/cc1plus-take-too-much-memory-tp14547002p14554622.html Sent from the gcc - Help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
