Michael Witten wrote: > What you describe is not related to compilation to an intermediate > language, which is all distcc really requires. It still very much matters, because the intermediate language depends on all those aspects of the target ABI. (And even then, the IL is not what gcc writes out; it's the generated assembly.) They are fundamental to how the code is parsed, optimized, and generated. A linux targeted gcc would have no idea how to even parse __declspec((dllimport)) just as the PE gcc would not be able to make any sense of __attribute__((visibility, "hidden")). They would simply choke and die because the code to handle those features just wasn't physically compiled in. And that is only one blatant example, but all of those things on that list directly affect code generation in a way that cannot be ignored. Even the basic assembler directives for ELF and PE are different. There is just no way to make a "generic i386 gcc". Brian
