Linux RAID Storage Date Index
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df2f2/df2f2a5779fb6d5d09f9f822adb08625e2a87275" alt=""
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: Mounting array at boot - works with some kernels but not others
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mounting array at boot - works with some kernels but not others
- From: Dennis Grant <reccedg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mounting array at boot - works with some kernels but not others
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 5 Array
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mounting array at boot - works with some kernels but not others
- From: Dennis Grant <reccedg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid Checks
- From: Jonathan Tripathy <jonnyt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 5 Array
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 5 Array
- From: Marcus <nexuslite@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mounting array at boot - works with some kernels but not others
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mounting array at boot - works with some kernels but not others
- From: Dennis Grant <reccedg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mounting array at boot - works with some kernels but not others
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mounting array at boot - works with some kernels but not others
- From: Dennis Grant <reccedg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mounting array at boot - works with some kernels but not others
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Mounting array at boot - works with some kernels but not others
- From: Dennis Grant <reccedg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Mdadm, udev and fakeraid?
- From: Seblu <seblu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: What the heck happened to my array? (No apparent data loss).
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- What the heck happened to my array? (No apparent data loss).
- From: Brad Campbell <lists2009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid Checks
- From: John Robinson <john.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid Checks
- From: Jonathan Tripathy <jonnyt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid Checks
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid Checks
- From: Jonathan Tripathy <jonnyt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid Checks
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 5 Array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid Checks
- From: Jonathan Tripathy <jonnyt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Raid Checks
- From: Jonathan Tripathy <jonnyt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 5 Array
- From: Marcus <nexuslite@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 5 Array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 5 Array
- From: Marcus <nexuslite@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 5 Array
- From: Marcus <nexuslite@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 5 Array
- From: Marcus <nexuslite@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 5 Array
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 5 Array
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 5 Array
- From: Simon Mcnair <simonmcnair@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 5 Array
- From: Simon Mcnair <simonmcnair@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 5 Array
- From: Simon McNair <simonmcnair@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 5 Array
- From: Simon McNair <simonmcnair@xxxxxxxxx>
- Raid 5 Array
- From: Marcus <nexuslite@xxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm 3.2.1: Segfaulting with -p
- From: Eugene <hdejin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone md device
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone md device
- From: Bas van Schaik <bas@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Doing 'echo repair > /sys/devices/virtual/block/md?/md/sync_action' does not result in mismatch_cnt of 0 on RAID-6?
- From: Rory Jaffe <rsjaffe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Doing 'echo repair > /sys/devices/virtual/block/md?/md/sync_action' does not result in mismatch_cnt of 0 on RAID-6?
- From: Bas van Schaik <bas@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: strange problem with my raid5
- From: Simon McNair <simonmcnair@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: strange problem with my raid5
- From: Simon McNair <simonmcnair@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: strange problem with my raid5
- From: hank peng <pengxihan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Extendible RAID10
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone md device
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Extendible RAID10
- From: Keld Jørn Simonsen <keld@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: strange problem with my raid5
- From: Simon McNair <simonmcnair@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid6 + caviar black + mpt2sas horrific performance
- From: Louis-David Mitterrand <vindex+lists-linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid6 + caviar black + mpt2sas horrific performance
- From: Louis-David Mitterrand <vindex+lists-linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: looking for advice on raid drives upgrade
- From: Vincent Schut <schut@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Network-based RAID6
- Re: raid6 + caviar black + mpt2sas horrific performance
- From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: looking for advice on raid drives upgrade
- Re: Network-based RAID6
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Network-based RAID6
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Network-based RAID6
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid6 + caviar black + mpt2sas horrific performance
- From: Iordan Iordanov <iordan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Network-based RAID6
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Network-based RAID6
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid6 + caviar black + mpt2sas horrific performance
- From: Joe Landman <joe.landman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid6 + caviar black + mpt2sas horrific performance
- From: Louis-David Mitterrand <vindex+lists-linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- md lzo
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Network-based RAID6
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Network-based RAID6
- From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Network-based RAID6
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: looking for advice on raid drives upgrade
- From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: looking for advice on raid drives upgrade
- From: Steven Haigh <netwiz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid6 + caviar black + mpt2sas horrific performance
- From: Joe Landman <joe.landman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid6 + caviar black + mpt2sas horrific performance
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Network-based RAID6
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid6 + caviar black + mpt2sas horrific performance
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: looking for advice on raid drives upgrade
- From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- strange problem with my raid5
- From: hank peng <pengxihan@xxxxxxxxx>
- blk_flush_plug in the MD code, was Re: [xfs-masters] linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with Linus' tree
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Extendible RAID10
- From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] Create: fix size after setting default chunk
- From: "Czarnowska, Anna" <anna.czarnowska@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] Create: check for UnSet when looking at chunk
- From: "Czarnowska, Anna" <anna.czarnowska@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: looking for advice on raid drives upgrade
- From: Vincent Schut <schut@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: looking for advice on raid drives upgrade
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- looking for advice on raid drives upgrade
- From: Vincent Schut <schut@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Network-based RAID6
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- raid6 + caviar black + mpt2sas horrific performance
- From: Louis-David Mitterrand <vindex+lists-linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Network-based RAID6
- From: CoolCold <coolthecold@xxxxxxxxx>
- Network-based RAID6
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 boot regression in 2.6.37 [bisected]
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 boot regression in 2.6.37 [bisected]
- From: Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 boot regression in 2.6.37 [bisected]
- From: Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 boot regression in 2.6.37 [bisected]
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 boot regression in 2.6.37 [bisected]
- From: Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 boot regression in 2.6.37 [bisected]
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- corrupted 600GiB md device
- From: Nathan Gamber <ngamber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 boot regression in 2.6.37 [bisected]
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 boot regression in 2.6.37 [bisected]
- From: Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Something wrong with __prep_thunderdome in super-intel.c
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 boot regression in 2.6.37 [bisected]
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] FIX: Cleanup after raid45->raid0 takeover
- From: Krzysztof Wojcik <krzysztof.wojcik@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] FIX: After discarding array give chance monitor to remove it
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 boot regression in 2.6.37 [bisected]
- From: Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 boot regression in 2.6.37 [bisected]
- From: Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 boot regression in 2.6.37 [bisected]
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Something wrong with __prep_thunderdome in super-intel.c
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Something wrong with __prep_thunderdome in super-intel.c
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] imsm: remove OEM table from detection of OROM and EFI.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] tests: use $config to store test config path
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] tests: backup default config before testing
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Disks with 4k sectors
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Disks with 4k sectors
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- raid1 boot regression in 2.6.37 [bisected]
- From: Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Something wrong with __prep_thunderdome in super-intel.c
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Please update mdadm 3.2.1 release
- From: "Labun, Marcin" <Marcin.Labun@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] imsm: reading of UEFI variables needs an update
- From: "Hawrylewicz Czarnowski, Przemyslaw" <przemyslaw.hawrylewicz.czarnowski@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] imsm: remove OEM table from detection of OROM and EFI.
- From: "Hawrylewicz Czarnowski, Przemyslaw" <przemyslaw.hawrylewicz.czarnowski@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Something wrong with __prep_thunderdome in super-intel.c
- From: "Kwolek, Adam" <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: grow MULTIPATH RAID
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: grow MULTIPATH RAID
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: grow MULTIPATH RAID
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: why disk errors are more likely to happen on md super block area?
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- grow MULTIPATH RAID
- From: shamim <shamim_99@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Something wrong with __prep_thunderdome in super-intel.c
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: why disk errors are more likely to happen on md super block area?
- From: hank peng <pengxihan@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] tests: backup default config before testing
- From: "Czarnowska, Anna" <anna.czarnowska@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] tests: use $config to store test config path
- From: "Czarnowska, Anna" <anna.czarnowska@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] FIX: imsm: Do not change serial if disk failed
- From: "Wojcik, Krzysztof" <krzysztof.wojcik@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Joe Landman <joe.landman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: why disk errors are more likely to happen on md super block area?
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- why disk errors are more likely to happen on md super block area?
- From: hank peng <pengxihan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] FIX: Do not count as backup devices, spare disks used for reshape
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] FIX: imsm: Do not change serial if disk failed
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fixes for double degraded array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: More ddf container woes
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: More ddf container woes
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] FIX: imsm: Do not change serial if disk failed
- From: Krzysztof Wojcik <krzysztof.wojcik@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Joe Landman <joe.landman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] FIX: Tests: raid0->raid10 without degradation
- From: Krzysztof Wojcik <krzysztof.wojcik@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] FIX: imsm: Rebuild does not start on second failed disk
- From: Krzysztof Wojcik <krzysztof.wojcik@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] Fixes for double degraded array
- From: Krzysztof Wojcik <krzysztof.wojcik@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Convert RAID5 to RAID6 in a live system
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Convert RAID5 to RAID6 in a live system
- From: Stefan Roese <stefan.roese@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Convert RAID5 to RAID6 in a live system
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Convert RAID5 to RAID6 in a live system
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Convert RAID5 to RAID6 in a live system
- From: Stefan Roese <stefan.roese@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] FIX: Do not count as backup devices, spare disks used for reshape
- From: "Kwolek, Adam" <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- ANNOUNCE: mdadm 3.1.5 - A tool for managing Soft RAID under Linux
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: cannot examine IMSM metadata on a disk in non-IMSM compliant system
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] man mdadm: Add note about auto-assembly during array reshape
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] man mdadm: add information for MDADM_EXPERIMENTAL flag
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-5 and mdadm --assemble troubleshooting
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] examine: allows to examine a disk metadata on non-metadata compliant systems
- From: "Labun, Marcin" <Marcin.Labun@xxxxxxxxx>
- PATCH 2/2] super-intel: enable loading metadata from non-IMSM compliant disks
- From: "Labun, Marcin" <Marcin.Labun@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: cannot examine IMSM metadata on a disk in non-IMSM compliant system
- From: "Labun, Marcin" <Marcin.Labun@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-5 and mdadm --assemble troubleshooting
- From: A J Wyborny <ajwyborny@xxxxxxxxx>
- Windows LDM status?
- From: Costin <costinel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] man mdadm: add information for MDADM_EXPERIMENTAL flag
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] man mdadm: Add note about auto-assembly during array reshape
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] man mdadm: add information for MDADM_EXPERIMENTAL flag
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Keld Jørn Simonsen <keld@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Keld Jørn Simonsen <keld@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Something wrong with __prep_thunderdome in super-intel.c
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-5 and mdadm --assemble troubleshooting
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Keld Jørn Simonsen <keld@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RAID-5 and mdadm --assemble troubleshooting
- From: A J Wyborny <ajwyborny@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Adaptive throttling for RAID1 background resync
- From: Hari Subramanian <hari@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Keld Jørn Simonsen <keld@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: disk order problem in a raid 10 array
- From: Xavier Brochard <xavier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] platform_intel: support EFI SCU OEM variable
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] imsm: FIX: indicate that metadada has to be written
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] FIX: Add spare throws exception (v2)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] FIX: Do not count as backup devices, spare disks used for reshape
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: disk order problem in a raid 10 array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD without LVM : should I reinstall ?
- From: John Robinson <john.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: disk order problem in a raid 10 array
- From: Xavier Brochard <xavier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: disk order problem in a raid 10 array
- From: Xavier Brochard <xavier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: disk order problem in a raid 10 array
- From: Xavier Brochard <xavier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: disk order problem in a raid 10 array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: disk order problem in a raid 10 array
- From: Xavier Brochard <xavier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: disk order problem in a raid 10 array
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: disk order problem in a raid 10 array
- From: Xavier Brochard <xavier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: disk order problem in a raid 10 array
- From: Xavier Brochard <xavier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: disk order problem in a raid 10 array
- From: Xavier Brochard <xavier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: disk order problem in a raid 10 array
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: disk order problem in a raid 10 array
- From: Xavier Brochard <xavier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: disk order problem in a raid 10 array
- From: Xavier Brochard <xavier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: disk order problem in a raid 10 array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: disk order problem in a raid 10 array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Adaptive throttling for RAID1 background resync
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Adaptive throttling for RAID1 background resync
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD without LVM : should I reinstall ?
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD without LVM : should I reinstall ?
- From: Thomas Carrié <thocar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Adaptive throttling for RAID1 background resync
- From: Hari Subramanian <hari@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Adaptive throttling for RAID1 background resync
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Adaptive throttling for RAID1 background resync
- From: Hari Subramanian <hari@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Adaptive throttling for RAID1 background resync
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Adaptive throttling for RAID1 background resync
- From: Hari Subramanian <hari@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: disk order problem in a raid 10 array
- From: Xavier Brochard <xavier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: disk order problem in a raid 10 array
- From: Xavier Brochard <xavier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: disk order problem in a raid 10 array
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- disk order problem in a raid 10 array
- From: Xavier Brochard <xavier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] platform_intel: support EFI SCU OEM variable
- From: "Labun, Marcin" <Marcin.Labun@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: i made sh*t can anyone help!?
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: i made sh*t can anyone help!?
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: i made sh*t can anyone help!?
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: i made sh*t can anyone help!?
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: i made sh*t can anyone help!?
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: i made sh*t can anyone help!?
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: i made sh*t can anyone help!?
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: i made sh*t can anyone help!?
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- i made sh*t can anyone help!?
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] FIX: Do not count as backup devices, spare disks used for reshape
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] imsm: FIX: indicate that metadada has to be written
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] FIX: Add spare throws exception (v2)
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] FIX: Add spare throws exception
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH 0/4] Raid0 metadata cannot be recognized
- From: "Kwolek, Adam" <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 13/36] md,rcu: convert call_rcu(free_conf) to kfree_rcu()
- From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Update documentation for sync_min and sync_max entries
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] UT and error case changes
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Retry writing 'inactive' state during stopping array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] Raid0 metadata cannot be recognized
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: MD without LVM : should I reinstall ?
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD without LVM : should I reinstall ?
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- MD without LVM : should I reinstall ?
- From: Thomas Carrié <thocar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- MD without LVM : should I reinstall ?
- From: Thomas Carrié <thocar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- MD without LVM : should I reinstall ?
- From: Thomas Carrié <thocar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] fix: mdadm -Ss for external metadata don't stop container
- From: "Hawrylewicz Czarnowski, Przemyslaw" <przemyslaw.hawrylewicz.czarnowski@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to implement raid1 repair
- From: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to implement raid1 repair
- From: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to implement raid1 repair
- From: Andrey Kuzmin <andrey.v.kuzmin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to implement raid1 repair
- From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to implement raid1 repair
- From: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to implement raid1 repair
- From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] Fix over-zealous flush_disk when changing device size.
- From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to implement raid1 repair
- From: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] fix: mdadm -Ss for external metadata don't stop container
- From: "Wojcik, Krzysztof" <krzysztof.wojcik@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Retry writing 'inactive' state during stopping array
- From: Krzysztof Wojcik <krzysztof.wojcik@xxxxxxxxx>
- How to implement raid1 repair
- From: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] fix: mdadm -Ss for external metadata don't stop container
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] Fix over-zealous flush_disk when changing device size.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] fix: mdadm -Ss for external metadata don't stop container
- From: "Hawrylewicz Czarnowski, Przemyslaw" <przemyslaw.hawrylewicz.czarnowski@xxxxxxxxx>
- inactive raid after kernel 2.6.32 update
- From: Xavier Brochard <xavier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] Fix over-zealous flush_disk when changing device size.
- From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 04/13] dm: use list_move() instead of list_del()/list_add() combination
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: More ddf container woes
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- md not flushing some pages
- From: Alexander Dorokhine <adorokhine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/4] FIX: Handle has to be closed
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/4] FIX: ping_monitor() usage causes memory leaks
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/4] FIX: Write metadata when mdmon is not running
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/4] FIX: Ping monitor when mdmon is running only
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/4] Raid0 metadata cannot be recognized
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Doing 'echo repair > /sys/devices/virtual/block/md?/md/sync_action' does not result in mismatch_cnt of 0 on RAID-6?
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Doing 'echo repair > /sys/devices/virtual/block/md?/md/sync_action' does not result in mismatch_cnt of 0 on RAID-6?
- From: Bas van Schaik <bas@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Update documentation for sync_min and sync_max entries
- From: CoolCold <coolthecold@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Doing 'echo repair > /sys/devices/virtual/block/md?/md/sync_action' does not result in mismatch_cnt of 0 on RAID-6?
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Doing 'echo repair > /sys/devices/virtual/block/md?/md/sync_action' does not result in mismatch_cnt of 0 on RAID-6?
- From: Bas van Schaik <bas@xxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH 0/3] UT and error case changes
- From: "Kwolek, Adam" <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Periodic RebuildStarted event
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 Shrinking array-size nearly killed the system
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 Shrinking array-size nearly killed the system
- From: Rory Jaffe <rsjaffe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 Shrinking array-size nearly killed the system
- From: Rory Jaffe <rsjaffe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: More ddf container woes
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Periodic RebuildStarted event
- From: CoolCold <coolthecold@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Periodic RebuildStarted event
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Periodic RebuildStarted event
- From: CoolCold <coolthecold@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Periodic RebuildStarted event
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Periodic RebuildStarted event
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Periodic RebuildStarted event
- From: CoolCold <coolthecold@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Q: imsm rapid recovery volume
- From: "Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] UT and error case changes
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Q: imsm rapid recovery volume
- From: Luca Berra <bluca@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Q: imsm rapid recovery volume
- From: "Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] imsm: Add metadata abort changes handler template
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] External metadata has to be restored to initial state in error case
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] imsm: FIX: existing backup file fails unit tests
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] UT and error case changes
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Q: imsm rapid recovery volume
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Removed two drives (still valid and working) from raid-5 and need to add them back in.
- From: "Matthew Tice" <mjtice@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Q: imsm rapid recovery volume
- From: Luca Berra <bluca@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: More ddf container woes
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: More ddf container woes
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Warn the user about too small array size
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] platfrom_intel: find OROM based on Intel AHCI and SAS driver device id
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] Checkpointing fixes
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Removed two drives (still valid and working) from raid-5 and need to add them back in.
- From: mtice <mjtice@xxxxxxxxx>
- Raid1 mismatches maybe associated to free space
- From: Asdo <asdo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Growing a raid array online with different capacity disks
- From: Drew <drew.kay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 Shrinking array-size nearly killed the system
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 Shrinking array-size nearly killed the system
- From: Rory Jaffe <rsjaffe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Removed two drives (still valid and working) from raid-5 and need to add them back in.
- From: mtice <mjtice@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Removed two drives (still valid and working) from raid-5 and need to add them back in.
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Removed two drives (still valid and working) from raid-5 and need to add them back in.
- From: mtice <mjtice@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server? GPFS w/ 10GB/s throughput to the rescue
- From: Matt Garman <matthew.garman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 Shrinking array-size nearly killed the system
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Removed two drives (still valid and working) from raid-5 and need to add them back in.
- From: mtice <mjtice@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 Shrinking array-size nearly killed the system
- From: Rory Jaffe <rsjaffe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 Shrinking array-size nearly killed the system
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Add more warnings to --grow documentation (was: RAID5 Shrinking array-size nearly killed the system)
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 Shrinking array-size nearly killed the system
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 Shrinking array-size nearly killed the system
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- RAID5 Shrinking array-size nearly killed the system
- From: Rory Jaffe <rsjaffe@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] platfrom_intel: find OROM based on Intel AHCI and SAS driver device id
- From: "Labun, Marcin" <Marcin.Labun@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] imsm: FIX: Store checkpoint in per disk units
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] FIX: Last_checkpoint has to be initialized in per disk units
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] Checkpointing fixes
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: More ddf container woes
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- BUG_ON() at shutdown time
- From: Justin Maggard <jmaggard10@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] FIX: Last checkpoint is not initialized on reshape restart
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: polishing up mdadm manpages: mdassemble(8), mdmon(8)
- From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Growing a raid array online with different capacity disks
- Re: Growing a raid array online with different capacity disks
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Growing a raid array online with different capacity disks
- From: jimbob palmer <jimbobpalmer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Growing a raid array online with different capacity disks
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Growing a raid array online with different capacity disks
- From: jimbob palmer <jimbobpalmer@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] Warn the user about too small array size
- From: "Wojcik, Krzysztof" <krzysztof.wojcik@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] FIX: Unfreeze array on success only
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- More ddf container woes
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: polishing up mdadm manpages: mdassemble(8), mdmon(8)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/14] OROM/EFI support for Intel SAS and AHCI controllers in IMSM
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 9/9] imsm : FIX: Assemble dirty array when reshape is in progress
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 8/9] FIX: Set 'active' array state before array configuration
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 7/9] FIX: Array cannot be opened for writing on restart
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/9] FIX: Cannot continue reshape if mdmon is not run
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5/9] FIX: Unfreeze array on success only during reshape continuation
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/9] imsm: FIX: Do not clean checkpoint for active reshape
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/9] FIX: Make expansion counter usable
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] FIX: Block reshaped array monitoring
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/9] FIX: Load container content for container reshape continuation
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 9/9] imsm : FIX: Assemble dirty array when reshape is in progress
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 8/9] FIX: Set 'active' array state before array configuration
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 7/9] FIX: Array cannot be opened for writing on restart
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/9] FIX: Cannot continue reshape if mdmon is not run
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/9] FIX: Unfreeze array on success only during reshape continuation
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/9] imsm: FIX: Do not clean checkpoint for active reshape
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/9] FIX: Make expansion counter usable
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/9] FIX: Block reshaped array monitoring
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/9] FIX: Load container content for container reshape continuation
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/9] Reshape restart from checkpoint
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH 0/5] Make OLCE workeable
- From: "Kwolek, Adam" <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH 0/5] Make OLCE workeable
- From: "Kwolek, Adam" <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make OLCE workeable
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH 0/5] Make OLCE workeable
- From: "Kwolek, Adam" <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] FIX: Allow for takeover
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH 4/9] imsm: FIX: After checkpoint mark array have to be clean
- From: "Kwolek, Adam" <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make OLCE workeable
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 02/14] Platform-intel: support for OROM SAS and AHCI controller
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/9] imsm: FIX: After checkpoint mark array have to be clean
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 01/14] probe_roms: allow to probe expansion ROMs using vendor and device id.
- From: "Labun, Marcin" <Marcin.Labun@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 00/14] OROM/EFI support for Intel SAS and AHCI controllers in IMSM
- From: "Labun, Marcin" <Marcin.Labun@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 13/14] imsm: introduce SAS controller support in imsm metadata handler
- From: "Labun, Marcin" <Marcin.Labun@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 12/14] imsm: move code for retrieving HBA to a function
- From: "Labun, Marcin" <Marcin.Labun@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 08/14] imsm: do not publish OROM/EFI unsupported arrays
- From: "Labun, Marcin" <Marcin.Labun@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 07/14] imsm: detail_platform_imsm displays AHCI and SAS controller information
- From: "Labun, Marcin" <Marcin.Labun@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 05/14] read platform capabilities from EFI
- From: "Labun, Marcin" <Marcin.Labun@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 04/14] Some guid manipulation utilities has been added.
- From: "Labun, Marcin" <Marcin.Labun@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 03/14] update of imsm_orom structure
- From: "Labun, Marcin" <Marcin.Labun@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 02/14] Platform-intel: support for OROM SAS and AHCI controller
- From: "Labun, Marcin" <Marcin.Labun@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 14/14] platform_intel: support for OROM OEM capabilities
- From: "Labun, Marcin" <Marcin.Labun@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 11/14] imsm: verify that component disks are attached to the same type of HBA
- From: "Labun, Marcin" <Marcin.Labun@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 10/14] imsm: add maximum number of disk validation in RAID array
- From: "Labun, Marcin" <Marcin.Labun@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 09/14] imsm: print-out error message when volume validation fails
- From: "Labun, Marcin" <Marcin.Labun@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 06/14] imsm: remove unused parameters in function attach_hba_to_super
- From: "Labun, Marcin" <Marcin.Labun@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/5] FIX: Compute spares_needed basing on metadata info
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/5] FIX: Remove delta_parity concept
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/5] FIX: Allow for takeover
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/5] FIX: Set new raid disks when delta_disks is valid
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/5] fix: array is reassembled inactive if stopped during resync
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/5] Make OLCE workeable
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH 0/9] Grow_continue() - single array.
- From: "Kwolek, Adam" <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH 4/9] imsm: FIX: After checkpoint mark array have to be clean
- From: "Kwolek, Adam" <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] imsm: FIX: Mark checkpoint and array state clean during reshape
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] FIX: During reshape array is in active state
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/9] Grow_continue() - single array.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/9] imsm: FIX: After checkpoint mark array have to be clean
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- polishing up mdadm manpages: mdassemble(8), mdmon(8)
- From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] Fix over-zealous flush_disk when changing device size.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] Fix over-zealous flush_disk when changing device size.
- From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Enable error message in case of lack of spares for grow
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] fix: generated udev rules does not work due to incorrect line format
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] Fix over-zealous flush_disk when changing device size.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] Fix over-zealous flush_disk when changing device size.
- From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] fix: generated udev rules does not work due to incorrect line format
- From: "Hawrylewicz Czarnowski, Przemyslaw" <przemyslaw.hawrylewicz.czarnowski@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Reshape restart questions.
- From: "Kwolek, Adam" <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix over-zealous flush_disk when changing device size.
- From: Andrew Patterson <andrew.patterson@xxxxxx>
- Re: Reshape restart questions.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: stripe cache question
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 seemingly shrunk itself after hard power outage and rebuild with replacement disk
- From: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix over-zealous flush_disk when changing device size.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 seemingly shrunk itself after hard power outage and rebuild with replacement disk
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 seemingly shrunk itself after hard power outage and rebuild with replacement disk
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Impact of missing parameter during mdadm create
- From: John Robinson <john.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Impact of missing parameter during mdadm create
- From: Mike Viau <viaum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 seemingly shrunk itself after hard power outage and rebuild with replacement disk
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Impact of missing parameter during mdadm create
- From: Ken Drummond <linuxraid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RAID6 seemingly shrunk itself after hard power outage and rebuild with replacement disk
- From: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix over-zealous flush_disk when changing device size.
- From: Andrew Patterson <andrew.patterson@xxxxxx>
- Reshape restart questions.
- From: "Kwolek, Adam" <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm ddf questions
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Impact of missing parameter during mdadm create
- From: Ken Drummond <linuxraid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ideas - raid write
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Impact of missing parameter during mdadm create
- From: Mike Viau <viaum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Impact of missing parameter during mdadm create
- From: Mike Viau <viaum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ideas - raid write
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix over-zealous flush_disk when changing device size.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: ideas - raid write
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ideas - raid write
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ideas - raid write
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- ideas - raid write
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix over-zealous flush_disk when changing device size.
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Impact of missing parameter during mdadm create
- From: Ken Drummond <linuxraid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Assembling RAID 5 array with missing superblock
- From: Lasse Jensen <fafler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Increasing maxsect of md devices?
- From: Bart Kus <me@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Increasing maxsect of md devices?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm ddf questions
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm ddf questions
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Increasing maxsect of md devices?
- From: Bart Kus <me@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm ddf questions
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- RE: Latency issues with MD-RAID
- From: "Jansen, Frank" <fjansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Drew <drew.kay@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Enable error message in case of lack of spares for grow
- From: Krzysztof Wojcik <krzysztof.wojcik@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID10 Performance
- From: "Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe" <Mario.Holbe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID10 Performance
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID10 Performance
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 9/9] imsm: FIX: Variables declaration cleanup
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 8/9] FIX: Block array monitoring when assembling reshaped array
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 7/9] FIX: Set 'new' geometry when assembling reshaped array
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/9] FIX: Verify Backup file name before reshape
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/9] FIX: Continue reshape in the background
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/9] FIX: Array during reshape cannot be configured
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/9] imsm: FIX: After checkpoint mark array have to be clean
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/9] imsm: FIX: Return blocks_per unit for general migration
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/9] FIX: Do not configure and start, already started reshape
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/9] Grow_continue() - single array.
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID10 Performance
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID10 Performance
- From: Keld Jørn Simonsen <keld@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID10 Performance
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RAID10 Performance
- From: Aaron Sowry <aaron@xxxxxxxxx>
- RAID10 Performance
- From: Aaron Sowry <aaron@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH 0/5] Grow_continue() prepare for usage in assembly
- From: "Kwolek, Adam" <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH 0/7] Grow_continue, use in assembly (cont.)
- From: "Kwolek, Adam" <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH 3/7] FIX: configure disks slot for expansion
- From: "Kwolek, Adam" <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH 1/7] FIX: Verify Backup file name before reshape
- From: "Kwolek, Adam" <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH 0/5] Grow_continue() prepare for usage in assembly
- From: "Kwolek, Adam" <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Failed RAID 6 array advice
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Failed RAID 6 array advice
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Failed RAID 6 array advice
- From: jahammonds prost <gmitch64@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Joe Landman <joe.landman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Matt Garman <matthew.garman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] Grow_continue, use in assembly (cont.)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/7] FIX: configure disks slot for expansion
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/7] FIX: reshape in md should wait for monitoring process (external metadata)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/7] FIX: Verify Backup file name before reshape
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] Grow_continue() prepare for usage in assembly
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Latency issues with MD-RAID
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Latency issues with MD-RAID
- From: "Jansen, Frank" <fjansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Impact of missing parameter during mdadm create
- From: Mike Viau <viaum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 7/7] FIX: array is frozen after reshape
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/7] FIX: Block monitor when starting array with reshape in progress
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/7] Continue reshape after assembling array
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/7] Add block_subarray()
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/7] FIX: configure disks slot for expansion
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/7] FIX: reshape in md should wait for monitoring process (external metadata)
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/7] FIX: Verify Backup file name before reshape
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/7] Grow_continue, use in assembly (cont.)
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Impact of missing parameter during mdadm create
- From: Mike Viau <viaum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Impact of missing parameter during mdadm create
- From: Mike Viau <viaum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/5] FIX: Do not configure and start, already started reshape
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/5] FIX: Continue reshape in the background
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/5] FIX: Set readonly state in Grow_continue() when necessary
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/5] FIX: Pass container name to reshape array for external meta data
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/5] FIX: Spelling error in dprintf output
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/5] Grow_continue() prepare for usage in assembly
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Joe Landman <joe.landman@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Warn the user about too small array size
- From: Krzysztof Wojcik <krzysztof.wojcik@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH 0/3] Continue expansion after reboot
- From: "Kwolek, Adam" <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Ed W <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server? GPFS w/ 10GB/s throughput to the rescue
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stripe cache question
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: OK, Now this is really weird
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- RE: OK, Now this is really weird
- From: "Leslie Rhorer" <lrhorer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: OK, Now this is really weird
- From: "Leslie Rhorer" <lrhorer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] Continue expansion after reboot
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: stripe cache question
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- RE: Removed drive from mdadm raid 5 array after reboot
- From: Mike Viau <viaum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server? GPFS w/ 10GB/s throughput to the rescue
- From: Joe Landman <joe.landman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server? GPFS w/ 10GB/s throughput to the rescue
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: OK, Now this is really weird
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: OK, Now this is really weird
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: OK, Now this is really weird
- From: "Leslie Rhorer" <lrhorer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stripe cache question
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: OK, Now this is really weird
- From: Jeff Woods <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- OK, Now this is really weird
- From: "Leslie Rhorer" <lrhorer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm ddf questions
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: auto-read-only question
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Partitions could be meaningful on single-drive RAID0
- From: Krzysztof Wojcik <krzysztof.wojcik@xxxxxxxxx>
- auto-read-only question
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH 0/3] Continue expansion after reboot
- From: "Kwolek, Adam" <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] FIX: imsm: OROM does not recognize degraded arrays (V2)
- From: Krzysztof Wojcik <krzysztof.wojcik@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] FIX: imsm: OROM does not recognize degraded arrays
- From: "Wojcik, Krzysztof" <krzysztof.wojcik@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PULL REQUEST] md and related patches for 2.6.38
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stripe cache question
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: failed drive in raid 1 array
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: failed drive in raid 1 array
- From: Roberto Nunnari <roberto.nunnari@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: failed drive in raid 1 array
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: failed drive in raid 1 array
- From: Iordan Iordanov <iordan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Joe Landman <joe.landman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Joe Landman <joe.landman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG 2.6.32] md/raid1: barrier disabling does not work correctly in all cases
- From: Paul Clements <paul.clements@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- stripe cache question
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Matt Garman <matthew.garman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Zdenek Kaspar <zkaspar82@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Matt Garman <matthew.garman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Matt Garman <matthew.garman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Matt Garman <matthew.garman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Matt Garman <matthew.garman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PULL REQUEST] md and related patches for 2.6.38
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: failed drive in raid 1 array
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] FIX: imsm: OROM does not recognize degraded arrays
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Assembling RAID 5 array with missing superblock
- From: John Robinson <john.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] FIX: imsm: OROM does not recognize degraded arrays
- From: Krzysztof Wojcik <krzysztof.wojcik@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Assembling RAID 5 array with missing superblock
- From: Iordan Iordanov <iordan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: failed drive in raid 1 array
- From: Iordan Iordanov <iordan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- -Y option patch
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Assembling RAID 5 array with missing superblock
- From: Lasse Jensen <fafler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PULL REQUEST] md and related patches for 2.6.38
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PULL REQUEST] md and related patches for 2.6.38
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Likely forced assemby with wrong disk during raid5 grow. Recoverable?
- From: Claude Nobs <claudenobs@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: John Robinson <john.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: failing a drive while RAID5 is initializing
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: failed drive in raid 1 array
- From: Roberto Nunnari <roberto.nunnari@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: failing a drive while RAID5 is initializing
- From: Iordan Iordanov <iordan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: failed drive in raid 1 array
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: failed drive in raid 1 array
- From: Roberto Nunnari <roberto.nunnari@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: failed drive in raid 1 array
- From: Roberto Nunnari <roberto.nunnari@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Assembling RAID 5 array with missing superblock
- From: Jaap Crezee <jaap@xxxxxx>
- Re: failed drive in raid 1 array
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: failed drive in raid 1 array
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: failed drive in raid 1 array
- From: Roberto Nunnari <roberto.nunnari@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: failed drive in raid 1 array
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- failed drive in raid 1 array
- From: Roberto Nunnari <roberto.nunnari@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: failing a drive while RAID5 is initializing
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: removing AHCI SATA devices
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- failing a drive while RAID5 is initializing
- From: Iordan Iordanov <iordan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/4] TBD: continue reshape after assembling array
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/4] FIX: Block monitor when starting array with reshape in progress
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/4] FIX: Prevent reshape auto start during assembly for external metadata
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/4] FIX: disks added beyond array should be counted during reshape
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/4] Prepare assembled array for reshape (expansion)
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: John Robinson <john.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Assembling RAID 5 array with missing superblock
- From: Lasse Jensen <fafler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: removing AHCI SATA devices
- From: John Robinson <john.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: removing AHCI SATA devices
- Re: [PATCH] Fix over-zealous flush_disk when changing device size.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH 0/3] Continue expansion after reboot
- From: "Kwolek, Adam" <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] Fix over-zealous flush_disk when changing device size.
- From: "Kwolek, Adam" <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: removing AHCI SATA devices
- From: Simon McNair <simonmcnair@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm ddf questions
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md road-map: 2011
- From: Daniel Reurich <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] Continue expansion after reboot
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Single-drive RAID0
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Likely forced assemby with wrong disk during raid5 grow. Recoverable?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Likely forced assemby with wrong disk during raid5 grow. Recoverable?
- From: Claude Nobs <claudenobs@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Two questions about stripe_cache_size
- From: "Patrick J. LoPresti" <lopresti@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Two questions about stripe_cache_size
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Two questions about stripe_cache_size
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Two questions about stripe_cache_size
- From: "Patrick J. LoPresti" <lopresti@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Two questions about stripe_cache_size
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Two questions about stripe_cache_size
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Two questions about stripe_cache_size
- From: "Patrick J. LoPresti" <lopresti@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: removing AHCI SATA devices
- From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 - without stripe
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 - without stripe
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- raid10 - without stripe
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux software RAID assistance
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux software RAID assistance
- From: Simon McNair <simonmcnair@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux software RAID assistance
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux software RAID assistance
- From: Simon Mcnair <simonmcnair@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux software RAID assistance
- From: Simon Mcnair <simonmcnair@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Single-drive RAID0
- From: Jan Ceuleers <jan.ceuleers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- removing AHCI SATA devices
- From: Simon Mcnair <simonmcnair@xxxxxxxxx>
- Combining RAID6 and mdadm RAID10?
- [PATCH 3/3] FIX: Assemble device in reshape state with new disks number
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] imsm: FIX: Report correct array size during reshape
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] imsm: FIX: initalize reshape progress as it is stored in metatdata
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] Continue expansion after reboot
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Possible availability improvement
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Possible availability improvement
- From: Michał Sawicz <michal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Single-drive RAID0
- From: "Wojcik, Krzysztof" <krzysztof.wojcik@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Mattias Wadenstein <maswan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm ddf questions
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: SSD - TRIM command
- From: "Guy Watkins" <linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: "Eric D. Mudama" <edmudama@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Single-drive RAID0
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: "Eric D. Mudama" <edmudama@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: "Eric D. Mudama" <edmudama@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: Brendan Conoboy <blc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] set default chunk in validate_geometry
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: New machine, new RAID, wrong device name...
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: New machine, new RAID, wrong device name...
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix over-zealous flush_disk when changing device size.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- New machine, new RAID, wrong device name...
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: Doug Dumitru <doug@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix over-zealous flush_disk when changing device size.
- From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SSD - TRIM command
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Single-drive RAID0
- From: "Wojcik, Krzysztof" <krzysztof.wojcik@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Mattias Wadenstein <maswan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] set default chunk in validate_geometry
- From: "Czarnowska, Anna" <anna.czarnowska@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: high throughput storage server?
- From: Mattias Wadenstein <maswan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] modified message on failure to read metadata in Manage
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Single-drive RAID0
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Likely forced assemby with wrong disk during raid5 grow. Recoverable?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Likely forced assemby with wrong disk during raid5 grow. Recoverable?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux software RAID assistance
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux software RAID assistance
- From: Simon Mcnair <simonmcnair@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux software RAID assistance
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux software RAID assistance
- From: Simon Mcnair <simonmcnair@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux software RAID assistance
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Likely forced assemby with wrong disk during raid5 grow. Recoverable?
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Likely forced assemby with wrong disk during raid5 grow. Recoverable?
- From: Claude Nobs <claudenobs@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid selection questions (10 vs 6, n2 vs f2) on an 8 drive array
- From: Simon Mcnair <simonmcnair@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux software RAID assistance
- From: Simon Mcnair <simonmcnair@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Possible HDD error, how do I find which HDD it is?
- From: Simon Mcnair <simonmcnair@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Likely forced assemby with wrong disk during raid5 grow. Recoverable?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Possible HDD error, how do I find which HDD it is?
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- Likely forced assemby with wrong disk during raid5 grow. Recoverable?
- From: Claude Nobs <claudenobs@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Possible HDD error, how do I find which HDD it is?
- From: John Robinson <john.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Possible HDD error, how do I find which HDD it is?
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Possible HDD error, how do I find which HDD it is?
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Possible HDD error, how do I find which HDD it is?
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Possible HDD error, how do I find which HDD it is?
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Possible HDD error, how do I find which HDD it is?
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Possible HDD error, how do I find which HDD it is?
- From: John Robinson <john.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Possible HDD error, how do I find which HDD it is?
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Linux RAID Wiki]
[ATA RAID]
[Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]
[Linux Block]
[Linux IDE]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux Hams]
[Device Mapper]
[Kernel]
[Linux Admin]
[Linux Net]
[GFS]
[RPM]
[git]
[Yosemite Forum]
[Linux Networking]