On 30/03/2011 15:31, Steven Haigh wrote:
On 31/03/2011 12:14 AM, David Brown wrote:
If you've got a spare drive slot, and plenty of time, there is another
option that lets you keep online and redundant during the process.
Re-shape the array to raid 6, while adding one of the new drives. Then
you can replace each drive, one at a time, letting the raid recover in
between. For the last drive, you just have to remove it then reshape
back to raid 5 (although ideally you could buy an extra drive and keep
the raid 6 layout - it's worth the cost, assuming you have the drive
slot).
Once everything is swapped over, you grow the array to fit the new disks.
This makes me wonder... What is recommended as the best practice... Use
the entire disk or 1 partition per device? Assuming of course that you
won't be booting off the RAID5/6....
I think the answer depends on what you are trying to do. If you are
just building a single big array, then whole devices make most sense.
But sometimes you want to try something more complicated (see my recent
thread - though no one has yet said if it is a good idea...). You may
also want more than one array with different characteristics, such as
the balance between capacity, speed (for different uses) and redundancy.
For example, you might think raid 5 is appropriate for some of your
data, and raid10 for other parts. By dividing each disk into two and
using partitions from one half for one array, and the other half for the
other array, you get both areas. Clearly you'll get a performance hit
if both arrays are used at the same time, but it's your choice.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
