Re: Raid 5 Array

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



why use raid 5,6? raid1 isn´t more secure?

2011/4/2 Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 22:45:58 +0100
> Simon Mcnair <simonmcnair@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> One last thing.... I've never heard of anyone using a raid 05. Why
>> wouldn't you use a RAID50 ?  Please can you dish the dirt on what
>> benefit there is ? (I would have thought a raid50 would have been
>> better with no disadvantages ?). I thought that raid10 & 50 were the
>> main ones in use in 'the industry'.
>
> RAID5/6 with some RAID0 (or JBOD) members is what you use when you want to
> include differently-sized devices into the array:
> http://louwrentius.com/blog/2008/08/building-a-raid-6-array-of-mixed-drives/
> --
> With respect,
> Roman
>



-- 
Roberto Spadim
Spadim Technology / SPAEmpresarial
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux