Linux RAID Storage Date Index
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- [PATCH] imsm: FIX: Limit migration record operation by disk slot not by index
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid10 and page cache
- From: Yucong Sun (叶雨飞) <sunyucong@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md: Add ability for disable bad block management
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/9] Array degradation during reshape and rebuild (cont.)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid10 and page cache
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: 4 out of 16 drives show up as 'removed'
- From: Eli Morris <ermorris@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid10 and page cache
- From: Yucong Sun (叶雨飞) <sunyucong@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: system startup hangs
- From: "Richard B. Pyne" <rpyne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: system startup hangs
- From: "Richard B. Pyne" <rpyne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: system startup hangs
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: system startup hangs
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- system startup hangs
- From: "Richard B. Pyne" <rpyne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4 out of 16 drives show up as 'removed'
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: 4 out of 16 drives show up as 'removed'
- From: Eli Morris <ermorris@xxxxxxxx>
- Fwd: 4 out of 16 drives show up as 'removed'
- From: Eli Morris <ermorris@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4 out of 16 drives show up as 'removed'
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: 4 out of 16 drives show up as 'removed'
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- 4 out of 16 drives show up as 'removed'
- From: Eli Morris <ermorris@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 9/9] imsm: FIX: Use defines for device map access
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 8/9] imsm: FIX: Check correct slots on disk failure
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 7/9] imsm: FIX: Finish rebuild and initialization when missing drive is handled
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/9] imsm: FIX: Mark failure for rebuild
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/9] imsm: FIX: Add array map state transition for failures during initialization
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/9] imsm: FIX: Do not allow spare activation during rebuild
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/9] imsm: Function imsm_set_disk() rework
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/9] imsm: FIX: Correct ords merging in end_migration()
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/9] imsm: FIX: Remove longer map request
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/9] Array degradation during reshape and rebuild (cont.)
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] md: Add ability for disable bad block management
- From: "Kwolek, Adam" <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid10 and page cache
- From: Yucong Sun (叶雨飞) <sunyucong@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid10 and page cache
- From: Yucong Sun (叶雨飞) <sunyucong@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid10 and page cache
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid10 and page cache
- From: Yucong Sun (叶雨飞) <sunyucong@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: meta: should i chase this down?
- From: Keith Keller <kkeller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid10 and page cache
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid10 and page cache
- From: Yucong Sun (叶雨飞) <sunyucong@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md: Add ability for disable bad block management
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: need a little help rebuilding a raid 10
- From: Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] imsm: fix: does not allow to use invalid chunk size
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid10 and page cache
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: meta: should i chase this down?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- meta: should i chase this down?
- From: Keith Keller <kkeller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid10 and page cache
- From: Marcus Sorensen <shadowsor@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid10 and page cache
- From: Yucong Sun (叶雨飞) <sunyucong@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid10 and page cache
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Raid10 and page cache
- From: Yucong Sun (叶雨飞) <sunyucong@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5: failing an active component during spare rebuild - arrays hangs
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5: failing an active component during spare rebuild - arrays hangs
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] imsm: fix: does not allow to use invalid chunk size
- From: "Hawrylewicz Czarnowski, Przemyslaw" <przemyslaw.hawrylewicz.czarnowski@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: need a little help rebuilding a raid 10
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: need a little help rebuilding a raid 10
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: need a little help rebuilding a raid 10
- From: Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] md: Add ability for disable bad block management
- From: "Kwolek, Adam" <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] imsm: do not fail load_container when first 2 disks are missing
- From: "Czarnowska, Anna" <anna.czarnowska@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Spin down
- From: Vincent Pelletier <plr.vincent@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH 00/11] Degradation during reshape
- From: "Kwolek, Adam" <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md: Add ability for disable bad block management
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Possible changes to bio cloning and some related stuff
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Possible changes to bio cloning and some related stuff
- From: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm, bitmap and split-brain
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Spin down
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5: failing an active component during spare rebuild - arrays hangs
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] imsm: fix: correct checking newly missing disks
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] imsm: fix: correct checking newly missing disks
- From: "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- need a little help rebuilding a raid 10
- From: Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] imsm: fix: correct checking newly missing disks
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] FIX: resolve make everything compilation error
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] imsm: FIX: Just created redundant array is not in uninitialized state
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] imsm: fix: does not allow to use invalid chunk size
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/11] Degradation during reshape
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] imsm: do not fail load_container when first 2 disks are missing
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] FIX: resolve make everything compilation error
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 round robin read support in md?
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] imsm: FIX: Just created redundant array is not in uninitialized state
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Is this stupid?
- From: "Leslie Rhorer" <lrhorer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Spin down
- From: Vincent Pelletier <plr.vincent@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Is this stupid?
- From: "Leslie Rhorer" <lrhorer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is this stupid?
- From: Doug Dumitru <doug@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 - repeated hot-pulls issue
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Spin down
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Is this stupid?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 round robin read support in md?
- From: Doug Dumitru <doug@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 round robin read support in md?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 round robin read support in md?
- From: Borg Onion <borg.onion@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md metadata nightmare
- From: Kenneth Emerson <kenneth.emerson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID1 round robin read support in md?
- From: Marcus Sorensen <shadowsor@xxxxxxxxx>
- RAID1 round robin read support in md?
- From: Borg Onion <borg.onion@xxxxxxxxx>
- Is this stupid?
- From: "Leslie Rhorer" <lrhorer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md metadata nightmare
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: md metadata nightmare
- From: wilsonjonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md metadata nightmare
- From: Kenneth Emerson <kenneth.emerson@xxxxxxxxx>
- md metadata nightmare
- From: Kenneth Emerson <kenneth.emerson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Spin down
- From: Vincent Pelletier <plr.vincent@xxxxxxxxx>
- RAID6 - repeated hot-pulls issue
- From: John Gehring <john.gehring@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] imsm: fix: correct checking newly missing disks
- From: "Dorau, Lukasz" <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] imsm: fix: correct checking newly missing disks
- From: "Dorau, Lukasz" <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH 01/11] imsm: FIX: Return longer map for failure setting
- From: "Kwolek, Adam" <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: quick question about write-intent bitmap
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- quick question about write-intent bitmap
- From: Marcus Sorensen <shadowsor@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/11] imsm: FIX: Return longer map for failure setting
- From: "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.2.2: Behavioral change when adding back a previously faulted device
- From: John Robinson <john.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm 3.2.2: Behavioral change when adding back a previously faulted device
- From: Martin Steigerwald <ms@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] md: Add ability for disable bad block management
- From: "Kwolek, Adam" <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH 01/11] imsm: FIX: Return longer map for failure setting
- From: "Kwolek, Adam" <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] imsm: fix: correct checking newly missing disks
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/11] imsm: FIX: Return longer map for failure setting
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md: Add ability for disable bad block management
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linear raid, is partial recovery possible?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linear raid, is partial recovery possible?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linear raid, is partial recovery possible?
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linear raid, is partial recovery possible?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- linear raid, is partial recovery possible?
- From: wilsonjonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Ubuntu mdadm Raid and EFI
- From: John Robinson <john.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Ubuntu mdadm Raid and EFI
- From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [UPDATED PATCH 57/62] dm: remove the second argument of k[un]map_atomic()
- From: Cong Wang <amwang@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [UPDATED PATCH 17/62] md: remove the second argument of k[un]map_atomic()
- From: Cong Wang <amwang@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 17/62] md: remove the second argument of k[un]map_atomic()
- From: Cong Wang <amwang@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 17/62] md: remove the second argument of k[un]map_atomic()
- From: Milan Broz <mbroz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5: failing an active component during spare rebuild - arrays hangs
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 17/62] md: remove the second argument of k[un]map_atomic()
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 57/62] md: remove the second argument of k[un]map_atomic()
- From: Cong Wang <amwang@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 17/62] md: remove the second argument of k[un]map_atomic()
- From: Cong Wang <amwang@xxxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm, bitmap and split-brain
- From: Ronal Andadinata <randadinata@xxxxxxxxx>
- Online RAID1 -> RAID10 migration?
- From: Bart Kus <me@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] imsm: fix: does not allow to use invalid chunk size
- From: Przemyslaw Czarnowski <przemyslaw.hawrylewicz.czarnowski@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Ubuntu mdadm Raid and EFI
- From: Dominique <dcouot@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is it possible to change the wait time before a drive is concidered failed?
- From: Thomas Fjellstrom <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Ubuntu mdadm Raid and EFI
- From: Dominique <dcouot@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: partition based raid1 and multi boot Ubuntu/Xubuntu
- From: Gavin Whitehead <gavin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] md: Add ability for disable bad block management
- From: Paul Menzel <pm.debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] md: Add ability for disable bad block management
- From: "Kwolek, Adam" <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md: Add ability for disable bad block management
- From: Paul Menzel <pm.debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] md: Add ability for disable bad block management
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 11/11] Disable BBM when it is not supported
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 10/11] imsm: FIX: Check maximum allowed degradation level in recover_backup_imsm()
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 09/11] imsm: FIX: Check maximum allowed degradation level in open_backup_targets()
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 08/11] imsm: FIX: Function rework - imsm_count_failed()
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 07/11] imsm: FIX: Manage second map state on array degradation
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 06/11] imsm: FIX: Restore critical section on degraded array
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 05/11] imsm: FIX: Remove single map state limitation in getinfo
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 04/11] imsm: FIX: Finalize degraded migration
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 03/11] imsm: FIX: Do not end migration when missing drive is handled
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 02/11] imsm: FIX: Mark both maps on degradation while migrating
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 01/11] imsm: FIX: Return longer map for failure setting
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 00/11] Degradation during reshape
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: partition based raid1 and multi boot Ubuntu/Xubuntu
- From: Gordon Henderson <gordon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] imsm: do not fail load_container when first 2 disks are missing
- From: "Czarnowska, Anna" <anna.czarnowska@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] imsm: fix, check all volumes state in Grow_continue function
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] imsm: incorrect incremental behavior because of wrong index used
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- md metadata nightmare
- From: Kenneth Emerson <kenneth.emerson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md metadata nightmare
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: partition based raid1 and multi boot Ubuntu/Xubuntu
- From: Gavin Whitehead <gavin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md device io request split
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] imsm: incorrect incremental behavior because of wrong index used
- From: "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] imsm: incorrect incremental behavior because of wrong index used
- From: Przemyslaw Czarnowski <przemyslaw.hawrylewicz.czarnowski@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md metadata nightmare
- From: CoolCold <coolthecold@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] imsm: fix, check all volumes state in Grow_continue function
- From: "Labun, Marcin" <Marcin.Labun@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md device io request split
- From: "Ramon Schönborn" <RSchoenborn@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [OT] Re: Disk identity crisis on RAID10 recovery (3.1.0)
- From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [OT] Re: Disk identity crisis on RAID10 recovery (3.1.0)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [OT] Re: Disk identity crisis on RAID10 recovery (3.1.0)
- From: Konrad Rzepecki <krzepecki@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md metadata nightmare
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md device io request split
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: md metadata nightmare
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- md metadata nightmare
- From: Kenneth Emerson <kenneth.emerson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: partition based raid1 and multi boot Ubuntu/Xubuntu
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- partition based raid1 and multi boot Ubuntu/Xubuntu
- From: Gavin Whitehead <gavin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Disk identity crisis on RAID10 recovery (3.1.0)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Is it possible to change the wait time before a drive is concidered failed?
- From: wilsonjonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Disk identity crisis on RAID10 recovery (3.1.0)
- From: Konrad Rzepecki <krzepecki@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Disk identity crisis on RAID10 recovery (3.1.0)
- From: Konrad Rzepecki <krzepecki@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1d crash at boot
- From: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1d crash at boot
- From: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Disk identity crisis on RAID10 recovery (3.1.0)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Disk identity crisis on RAID10 recovery (3.1.0)
- From: Konrad Rzepecki <krzepecki@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1d crash at boot
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- md device io request split
- From: "Ramon Schönborn" <RSchoenborn@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Question about mdadm commit d6508f0cfb60edf07b36f1532eae4d9cddf7178b "be more careful about add attempts"
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Question about raid 10 and raid 1+0 setup
- From: Holger Kiehl <Holger.Kiehl@xxxxxx>
- Re: raid1d crash at boot
- From: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: possible bug - bitmap dirty pages status
- From: linbloke <linbloke@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Question about raid 10 and raid 1+0 setup
- From: Holger Kiehl <Holger.Kiehl@xxxxxx>
- RE: BUG_ON triggered in worker_enter_idle, after power failure caused potential RAID corruption (kernel 2.6.39.4)
- From: Bruce Stenning <b.stenning@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1d crash at boot
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1d crash at boot
- From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] fix: correct metadata's update communication
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Question about mdadm commit d6508f0cfb60edf07b36f1532eae4d9cddf7178b "be more careful about add attempts"
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Is it possible to change the wait time before a drive is concidered failed?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1d crash at boot
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Is it possible to change the wait time before a drive is concidered failed?
- From: wilsonjonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] fix: correct metadata's update communication
- From: Lukasz Dorau <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] imsm: fix: correct printing value of blocks per migration unit
- From: Lukasz Dorau <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD RAID1 weirdness *SOLVED*
- From: Danilo Godec <danilo.godec@xxxxxxxxx>
- MD RAID1 weirdness
- From: Danilo Godec <danilo.godec@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Reshape 3-drive RAID1 into 3-drive RAID-5
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Reshape 3-drive RAID1 into 3-drive RAID-5
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Idea: Dynamic growth of the md array
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Idea: Dynamic growth of the md array
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Idea: Dynamic growth of the md array
- From: Terrance Hutchinson <Terrance.Hutchinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- BUG_ON triggered in worker_enter_idle, after power failure caused potential RAID corruption (kernel 2.6.39.4)
- From: Bruce Stenning <b.stenning@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] mdadm trivial: Print more detailed error messages on re-add failure
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Question about mdadm commit d6508f0cfb60edf07b36f1532eae4d9cddf7178b "be more careful about add attempts"
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] imsm: platform capabilities are not validated during level migration
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: possible bug - bitmap dirty pages status
- From: CoolCold <coolthecold@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid startup on a live CD?
- From: Hank Barta <hbarta@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: possible bug - bitmap dirty pages status
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: possible bug - bitmap dirty pages status
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Reshape 3-drive RAID1 into 3-drive RAID-5
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid startup on a live CD?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Reshape 3-drive RAID1 into 3-drive RAID-5
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid startup on a live CD?
- From: Hank Barta <hbarta@xxxxxxxxx>
- Rebuilding Raid 1 set up
- From: William Colls <william.colls@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Reshape 3-drive RAID1 into 3-drive RAID-5
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] imsm: platform capabilities are not validated during level migration
- From: "Labun, Marcin" <Marcin.Labun@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md/raid10: handle recovery of replacement devices.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- re: md/raid10: handle recovery of replacement devices.
- From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid startup on a live CD?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- raid startup on a live CD?
- From: Hank Barta <hbarta@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] imsm: fix: correct checking newly missing disks
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: possible bug - bitmap dirty pages status
- From: linbloke <linbloke@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid Problem - Unknown File System Type
- From: William Colls <william.colls@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] imsm: fix: correct checking newly missing disks
- From: Lukasz Dorau <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid 5 to raid 6 reshape gone bad
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] imsm: fix: Allowed to create 2 volumes with total size less then maximum.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid 5 to raid 6 reshape gone bad
- From: Travis Brown <teb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid 5 to raid 6 reshape gone bad
- From: Travis Brown <teb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid 5 to raid 6 reshape gone bad
- From: Travis Brown <teb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid 5 to raid 6 reshape gone bad
- From: Keith Keller <kkeller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid 5 to raid 6 reshape gone bad
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid 5 to raid 6 reshape gone bad
- From: Keith Keller <kkeller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid 5 to raid 6 reshape gone bad
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- raid 5 to raid 6 reshape gone bad
- From: Travis Brown <teb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: unable to recover RAID 5 due to bad block [solved]
- From: Chris Purves <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: unable to recover RAID 5 due to bad block
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: unable to recover RAID 5 due to bad block
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: unable to recover RAID 5 due to bad block
- From: Chris Purves <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: unable to recover RAID 5 due to bad block
- From: Chris Purves <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: unable to recover RAID 5 due to bad block
- From: Alexander Kühn <alexander.kuehn@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: unable to recover RAID 5 due to bad block
- From: Chris Purves <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: unable to recover RAID 5 due to bad block
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: unable to recover RAID 5 due to bad block
- From: Jérôme Poulin <jeromepoulin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid Problem - Unknown File System Type
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid Problem - Unknown File System Type
- From: John Robinson <john.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: unable to recover RAID 5 due to bad block
- From: Alexander Kühn <alexander.kuehn@xxxxxxxxxx>
- unable to recover RAID 5 due to bad block
- From: Chris Purves <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid Problem - Unknown File System Type
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid Problem - Unknown File System Type
- From: William Colls <william.colls@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] imsm: fix: Allowed to create 2 volumes with total size less then maximum.
- From: "Labun, Marcin" <Marcin.Labun@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] imsm: control number of active imsm volumes in the system
- From: "Labun, Marcin" <Marcin.Labun@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] imsm: fix: Allowed to create 2 volumes with total size less then maximum.
- From: Lukasz Orlowski <lukasz.orlowski@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Intel RAID problems
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] kill-subarray: fix, IMSM cannot kill-subarray with unsupported metadata
- From: "Labun, Marcin" <Marcin.Labun@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid Problem - Unknown File System Type
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid Problem - Unknown File System Type
- From: William Colls <william.colls@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Intel RAID problems
- From: Blair Strater <me@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid Problem - Unknown File System Type
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mini change of raid5.c
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] imsm: control number of active imsm volumes in the system
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdraid write performance in different kernels up to 3.0, 3.0 shows huge improvement
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: All kinds of things on RAID/mdadm
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid Problem - Unknown File System Type
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid Problem - Unknown File System Type
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid Problem - Unknown File System Type
- From: William Colls <william.colls@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: All kinds of things on RAID/mdadm
- From: Keith Keller <kkeller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid Problem - Unknown File System Type
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid Problem - Unknown File System Type
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid Problem - Unknown File System Type
- From: William Colls <william.colls@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid Problem - Unknown File System Type
- From: Gordon Henderson <gordon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Raid Problem - Unknown File System Type
- From: William Colls <william.colls@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] imsm: control number of active imsm volumes in the system
- From: "Labun, Marcin" <Marcin.Labun@xxxxxxxxx>
- mini change of raid5.c
- From: "Hardy Flor" <Flor@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- PULL REQUEST - md bugfixes for 3.2-rc
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Question about mdadm commit d6508f0cfb60edf07b36f1532eae4d9cddf7178b "be more careful about add attempts"
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [systemd-devel] systemd kills mdmon if it was started manually by user
- From: "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [systemd-devel] systemd kills mdmon if it was started manually by user
- From: "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [systemd-devel] systemd kills mdmon if it was started manually by user
- From: Michal Soltys <soltys@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [systemd-devel] systemd kills mdmon if it was started manually by user
- From: Michal Soltys <soltys@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Question about mdadm commit d6508f0cfb60edf07b36f1532eae4d9cddf7178b "be more careful about add attempts"
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [systemd-devel] systemd kills mdmon if it was started manually by user
- From: Lennart Poettering <lennart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Auto-assembling RAID6 over RAID0?
- From: Michał Sawicz <michal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- mdraid write performance in different kernels up to 3.0, 3.0 shows huge improvement
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [systemd-devel] systemd kills mdmon if it was started manually by user
- From: Michal Soltys <soltys@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Impending failure?
- From: Peter Zieba <pzieba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Impending failure?
- From: Alex <mysqlstudent@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Error when compiling drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
- From: Witold Baryluk <baryluk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Working TRIM for md RAID
- From: Alex Besogonov <alex.besogonov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Working TRIM for md RAID
- From: David Rees <drees76@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Error when compiling drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
- From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [systemd-devel] systemd kills mdmon if it was started manually by user
- From: "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Special drives for Linux Raid?
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Special drives for Linux Raid?
- From: Beolach <beolach@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: documentation for echo check > /dev/mdX, etc.
- From: Beolach <beolach@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Error when compiling drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
- From: Witold Baryluk <baryluk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Error when compiling drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
- From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Error when compiling drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
- From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Error when compiling drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Error when compiling drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
- From: Witold Baryluk <baryluk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Error when compiling drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
- From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Special drives for Linux Raid?
- From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Special drives for Linux Raid?
- From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Error when compiling drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
- From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Special drives for Linux Raid?
- From: Danilo Godec <danilo.godec@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: All kinds of things on RAID/mdadm
- From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- All kinds of things on RAID/mdadm
- From: Martijn <mailinglist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [systemd-devel] systemd kills mdmon if it was started manually by user
- From: Lennart Poettering <lennart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] fix: Allowed to assemble 2 volumes with the same names from config file.
- From: "Orlowski, Lukasz" <lukasz.orlowski@xxxxxxxxx>
- Error when compiling drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
- From: Witold Baryluk <baryluk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [systemd-devel] systemd kills mdmon if it was started manually by user
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [systemd-devel] systemd kills mdmon if it was started manually by user
- From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [systemd-devel] systemd kills mdmon if it was started manually by user
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md/raid5: STRIPE_ACTIVE has lock semantics, add barriers
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] kill-subarray: fix, IMSM cannot kill-subarray with unsupported metadata
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] imsm: fix: add support for OLCE and migration to imsm_count_failed
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] fix: Allowed to assemble 2 volumes with the same names from config file.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] FIX: Do not continue container reshape when mdmon is absent
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] FIX: mdmon doesn't start
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] dm-ioctl: Don't leak memory in target_message() if 'argc' is NULL
- From: Jesper Juhl <jj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PANIC] : kernel BUG at drivers/md/raid5.c:2756!
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PANIC] : kernel BUG at drivers/md/raid5.c:2756!
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: potentially lost largeish raid5 array..
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: potentially lost largeish raid5 array..
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PANIC] : kernel BUG at drivers/md/raid5.c:2756!
- From: "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PANIC] : kernel BUG at drivers/md/raid5.c:2756!
- From: Manish Katiyar <mkatiyar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Impending failure?
- From: John Robinson <john.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- documentation for echo check > /dev/mdX, etc.
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Impending failure?
- From: Peter Zieba <pzieba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Impending failure?
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Impending failure?
- From: Alex <mysqlstudent@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Impending failure?
- From: Thomas Fjellstrom <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Impending failure?
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Impending failure?
- From: Jérôme Poulin <jeromepoulin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Impending failure?
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] imsm: fix: add support for OLCE and migration to imsm_count_failed
- From: Lukasz Dorau <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Impending failure?
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- Impending failure?
- From: Alex <mysqlstudent@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] fix: Allowed to assemble 2 volumes with the same names from config file.
- From: Lukasz Orlowski <lukasz.orlowski@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] kill-subarray: fix, IMSM cannot kill-subarray with unsupported metadata
- From: "Labun, Marcin" <Marcin.Labun@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] FIX: Do not continue container reshape when mdmon is absent
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] FIX: mdmon doesn't start
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/12] More leak and NULL pointer dereference fixes
- From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [systemd-devel] systemd kills mdmon if it was started manually by user
- From: "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [systemd-devel] systemd kills mdmon if it was started manually by user
- From: Lennart Poettering <lennart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [systemd-devel] systemd kills mdmon if it was started manually by user
- From: Lennart Poettering <lennart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [systemd-devel] systemd kills mdmon if it was started manually by user
- From: "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/19] More fixes for resource leaks and warnings
- From: Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/12] More leak and NULL pointer dereference fixes
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [systemd-devel] systemd kills mdmon if it was started manually by user
- From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [systemd-devel] systemd kills mdmon if it was started manually by user
- From: "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [systemd-devel] systemd kills mdmon if it was started manually by user
- From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [systemd-devel] systemd kills mdmon if it was started manually by user
- From: "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [systemd-devel] systemd kills mdmon if it was started manually by user
- From: "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [systemd-devel] systemd kills mdmon if it was started manually by user
- From: Lennart Poettering <lennart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [systemd-devel] systemd kills mdmon if it was started manually by user
- From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [systemd-devel] systemd kills mdmon if it was started manually by user
- From: Lennart Poettering <lennart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 12/12] match_metadata_desc(): Fix memory leak
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 11/12] fd2devname(): Don't dereference NULL pointer
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 10/12] Manage_ro(): Check pointer rather than dereferencing it
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 07/12] close_aa(): Verify file descriptors are valid before trying to close them
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 09/12] unblock_monitor(): Check sra is valid before dereferencing
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 08/12] ahci_enumerate_ports(): Don't close fd that failed to open
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 06/12] disk_init_and_add(): Fail if opening sysfs file descriptors fail
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 05/12] array_try_spare(): open_dev() returns -1 on error, not zero
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 04/12] get_component_size(): Check read() return value for error before using it
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 03/12] mdstat_read(): Check return value of dup() before using file descriptor
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 02/12] ping_monitor(): check file descriptor is valid before using and closing it
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 01/12] mdadm: add missing break for UpdateSubarray
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 00/12] More leak and NULL pointer dereference fixes
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH 00/19] More fixes for resource leaks and warnings
- From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [systemd-devel] systemd kills mdmon if it was started manually by user
- From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [systemd-devel] systemd kills mdmon if it was started manually by user
- From: Lennart Poettering <lennart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: possibly silly question (raid failover)
- From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: possibly silly question (raid failover)
- From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: possibly silly question (raid failover)
- From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: possibly silly question (raid failover)
- From: Jonathan Tripathy <jonnyt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: possibly silly question (raid failover)
- Re: possibly silly question (raid failover)
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [md PATCH 17/17] md/raid1: Mark device replaceable when we see a write error.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [md PATCH 16/17] md/raid1: If there is a spare and a replaceable device, start replacement.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [md PATCH 15/17] md/raid1: recognise replacements when assembling arrays.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [md PATCH 14/17] md/raid1: handle activation of replacement device when recovery completes.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [md PATCH 13/17] md/raid1: Allow a failed replacement device to be removed.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [md PATCH 12/17] md/raid1: Allocate spare to store replacement devices and their bios.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [md PATCH 11/17] md/raid1: Replace use of mddev->raid_disks with conf->raid_disks.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [md PATCH 10/17] md/raid10: If there is a spare and a replaceable device, start replacement.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [md PATCH 09/17] md/raid10: recognise replacements when assembling array.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [md PATCH 08/17] md/raid10: Allow replacement device to be replace old drive.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [md PATCH 07/17] md/raid10: handle recovery of replacement devices.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [md PATCH 06/17] md/raid10: Handle replacement devices during resync.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [md PATCH 05/17] md/raid10: writes should get directed to replacement as well as original.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [md PATCH 04/17] md/raid10: allow removal of failed replacement devices.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [md PATCH 03/17] md/raid10: preferentially read from replacement device if possible.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [md PATCH 02/17] md/raid10: change read_balance to return an rdev
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [md PATCH 01/17] md/raid10: prepare data structures for handling replacement.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [md PATCH 00/17] hot-replace support for RAID1 and RAID10
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [systemd-devel] systemd kills mdmon if it was started manually by user
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: possibly silly question (raid failover)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: possibly silly question (raid failover)
- Re: possibly silly question (raid failover)
- Re: [systemd-devel] systemd kills mdmon if it was started manually by user
- From: Lennart Poettering <lennart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [systemd-devel] systemd kills mdmon if it was started manually by user
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/19] More fixes for resource leaks and warnings
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [md PATCH 1/1] add display of hours remaining to finish resync
- From: Paul Menzel <pm.debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [md PATCH 1/1] add display of hours remaining to finish resync
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: possibly silly question (raid failover)
- From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Question about mdadm commit d6508f0cfb60edf07b36f1532eae4d9cddf7178b "be more careful about add attempts"
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: possibly silly question (raid failover)
- From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: possibly silly question (raid failover)
- From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: possibly silly question (raid failover)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: with raid-6 any writes access all disks
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: possibly silly question (raid failover)
- Re: possibly silly question (raid failover)
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [md PATCH 1/1] add display of hours remaining to finish resync
- From: Krzysztof Adamski <k@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: possibly silly question (raid failover)
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: possibly silly question (raid failover)
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: possibly silly question (raid failover)
- From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 19/19] make_parts(): Avoid false positive security warning
- From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: possibly silly question (raid failover)
- From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Question about mdadm commit d6508f0cfb60edf07b36f1532eae4d9cddf7178b "be more careful about add attempts"
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 09/19] Detail(): Remember to free 'avail'
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 14/19] Managa_ro(): free() mdi before exiting
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 12/19] Manage_subdevs(): avoid leaking super
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 19/19] make_parts(): Avoid false positive security warning
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 18/19] validate_geometry_imsm_volume(): Avoid NULL pointer dereference
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 17/19] bitmap_fd_read(): fix memory leak
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 15/19] Manage_runstop(): Avoid memory leak
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 16/19] Monitor(): free allocated memory on exit
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 10/19] Grow_reshape(): Fix another 'sra' leak
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 06/19] assemble_container_content(): fix memory leak
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 13/19] IncrementalScan(): Fix memory leak
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 11/19] enough_fd(): remember to free buffer for avail array
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 03/19] Incremental(): Check return value of dev_open() before trying to use it
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 07/19] Grow_restart(): free() offsets after use
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 08/19] Assemble(): don't dup_super() before we need it.
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 02/19] Grow_addbitmap(): don't try to close a file descriptor which failed to open
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 05/19] remove_devices(): readlink returns -1 on error
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 04/19] sysfs_unique_holder(): Check read() return value before using as buffer index
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 00/19] More fixes for resource leaks and warnings
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 01/19] Grow_Add_device(): dev_open() return a negative fd on error
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: possibly silly question (raid failover)
- From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: possibly silly question (raid failover)
- From: John Robinson <john.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: possibly silly question (raid failover)
- From: John Robinson <john.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: possibly silly question (raid failover)
- From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: possibly silly question (raid failover)
- From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: possibly silly question (raid failover)
- From: Johannes Truschnigg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: possibly silly question (raid failover)
- From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PANIC] : kernel BUG at drivers/md/raid5.c:2756!
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] conf_match(): Remove dead code
- From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PANIC] : kernel BUG at drivers/md/raid5.c:2756!
- From: Manish Katiyar <mkatiyar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PANIC] : kernel BUG at drivers/md/raid5.c:2756!
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] kill-subarray: fix, IMSM cannot kill-subarray with unsupported metadata
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/11] Memory/resource leaks and unchecked return fixes
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] conf_match(): Remove dead code
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- possibly silly question (raid failover)
- From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PANIC] : kernel BUG at drivers/md/raid5.c:2756!
- From: Manish Katiyar <mkatiyar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid(1) and block caching
- From: CoolCold <coolthecold@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] kill-subarray: fix, IMSM cannot kill-subarray with unsupported metadata
- From: "Labun, Marcin" <Marcin.Labun@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 11/11] mdmon(): Error out if failing to connect to victim monitor
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 10/11] Write_rules(): Avoid stack corruption if using extremely long udev pathname
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 09/11] policy_add(): Add missing va_end()
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 08/11] Avoid memory leak
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 07/11] Add missing return in case of trying to grow sub-array
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 06/11] Fix memory leak
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 05/11] partition_try_spare() use closedir() to release DIR * returned by opendir()
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 04/11] Fix memory leak of 'st3' in array_try_spare()
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 03/11] Fix memory leak
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 02/11] Fix memory leak
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 01/11] Fix memory leaks in reshape_array()
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 00/11] Memory/resource leaks and unchecked return fixes
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 3/3] Kill(): Remove redundant check and dead code
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 1/3] conf_match(): Remove dead code
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 2/3] conf_watch(): More dead code removal
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 0/3] Remove dead code
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [systemd-devel] systemd kills mdmon if it was started manually by user
- From: Lennart Poettering <lennart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [systemd-devel] systemd kills mdmon if it was started manually by user
- From: Lennart Poettering <lennart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Question about mdadm commit d6508f0cfb60edf07b36f1532eae4d9cddf7178b "be more careful about add attempts"
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Question about mdadm commit d6508f0cfb60edf07b36f1532eae4d9cddf7178b "be more careful about add attempts"
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] Avoid use after free
- From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: PULL REQUEST - serious md/RAID10 bug in 3.1 when activating a hot-spare.
- From: Brad Campbell <lists2009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: PULL REQUEST - serious md/RAID10 bug in 3.1 when activating a hot-spare.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: PULL REQUEST - serious md/RAID10 bug in 3.1 when activating a hot-spare.
- From: Brad Campbell <lists2009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: PULL REQUEST - serious md/RAID10 bug in 3.1 when activating a hot-spare.
- From: Brad Campbell <lists2009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- PULL REQUEST - serious md/RAID10 bug in 3.1 when activating a hot-spare.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] kill-subarray: fix, IMSM cannot kill-subarray with unsupported metadata
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] Avoid use after free
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Question about mdadm commit d6508f0cfb60edf07b36f1532eae4d9cddf7178b "be more careful about add attempts"
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Unable to restart reshape
- From: Michael Busby <michael.a.busby@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Unable to restart reshape
- From: Alexander Kühn <alexander.kuehn@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Unable to restart reshape
- From: Michael Busby <michael.a.busby@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Unable to restart reshape
- From: Michael Busby <michael.a.busby@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Unable to restart reshape
- From: Michael Busby <michael.a.busby@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Unable to restart reshape
- From: Michael Busby <michael.a.busby@xxxxxxxxx>
- Unable to restart reshape
- From: Michael Busby <michael.a.busby@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid(1) and block caching
- From: John Robinson <john.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid(1) and block caching
- From: CoolCold <coolthecold@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid(1) and block caching
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid(1) and block caching
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- raid(1) and block caching
- From: CoolCold <coolthecold@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] Avoid stack overflow if GPT partition entries on disk are > 128 bytes
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 1/2] Avoid use after free
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 0/2] Misc fixes
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH] kill-subarray: fix, IMSM cannot kill-subarray with unsupported metadata
- From: "Labun, Marcin" <Marcin.Labun@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Lost mdadm RAID6 array and tried everything, hoping for any other suggestions you may have
- From: Ryan Castellucci <ryan.castellucci+linux-raid@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [md PATCH 00/16] hot-replace support for RAID4/5/6
- From: "Peter W. Morreale" <morreale@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [md PATCH 00/16] hot-replace support for RAID4/5/6
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Auto-assembling RAID6 over RAID0?
- From: Michał Sawicz <michal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Auto-assembling RAID6 over RAID0?
- From: Michał Sawicz <michal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [md PATCH 00/16] hot-replace support for RAID4/5/6
- From: "Peter W. Morreale" <morreale@xxxxxxx>
- Re: with raid-6 any writes access all disks
- From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: with raid-6 any writes access all disks
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: with raid-6 any writes access all disks
- From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Question about mdadm commit d6508f0cfb60edf07b36f1532eae4d9cddf7178b "be more careful about add attempts"
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] GCC compile fix: remove calculation of unused variable 'reservation'
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] GCC compile fix: remove calculation of unused variable 'reservation'
- From: "Czarnowska, Anna" <anna.czarnowska@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/13] Add missing handling of malloc() failure
- From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] FIX: Close unused handle in child process during reshape restart
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/13] Add missing handling of malloc() failure
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] GCC compile fix: remove calculation of unused variable 'reservation'
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: with raid-6 any writes access all disks
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Question about mdadm commit d6508f0cfb60edf07b36f1532eae4d9cddf7178b "be more careful about add attempts"
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: with raid-6 any writes access all disks
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: with raid-6 any writes access all disks
- From: "Peter W. Morreale" <morreale@xxxxxxx>
- with raid-6 any writes access all disks
- From: Chris Pearson <kermit4@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [md PATCH 00/16] hot-replace support for RAID4/5/6
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Question about mdadm commit d6508f0cfb60edf07b36f1532eae4d9cddf7178b "be more careful about add attempts"
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 07/13] Fix malloc() failure handling in Monitor.c
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 05/13] Handle malloc() failure in Examine.c
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 13/13] Catch malloc() failure
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 10/13] Handle malloc() failure in Grow.c
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 12/13] Handle malloc() failure in mdstat.c
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 11/13] Handle malloc() failure in mdopen.c
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 09/13] Fix malloc handling in dlink.c
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 08/13] Handle malloc() failures in devline()
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 06/13] Handle malloc() errors in Manage.c
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 04/13] Attempt to catch malloc() failure in Detail.c
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 03/13] Try to catch malloc() failures in Assemble.c
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 02/13] Catch malloc() failures
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 01/13] count_active() catch malloc() failure
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 00/13] Add missing handling of malloc() failure
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH] FIX: Close unused handle in child process during reshape restart
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [md PATCH 00/16] hot-replace support for RAID4/5/6
- From: "Peter W. Morreale" <morreale@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] GCC compile fix: remove calculation of unused variable 'reservation'
- From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [md PATCH 00/16] hot-replace support for RAID4/5/6
- From: John Robinson <john.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [md PATCH 00/16] hot-replace support for RAID4/5/6
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [md PATCH 00/16] hot-replace support for RAID4/5/6
- From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [md PATCH 16/16] md/raid5: Mark device replaceable when we see a write error.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [md PATCH 15/16] md/raid5: If there is a spare and a replaceable device, start replacement.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [md PATCH 14/16] md/raid5: recognise replacements when assembling array.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [md PATCH 13/16] md/raid5: handle activation of replacement device when recovery completes.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [md PATCH 12/16] md/raid5: detect and handle replacements during recovery.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [md PATCH 11/16] md/raid5: writes should get directed to replacement as well as original.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [md PATCH 10/16] md/raid5: allow removal for failed replacement devices.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [md PATCH 09/16] md/raid5: preferentially read from replacement device if possible.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [md PATCH 08/16] md/raid5: remove redundant bio initialisations.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [md PATCH 07/16] md/raid5: raid5.h cleanup
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [md PATCH 06/16] md/raid5: allow each slot to have an extra replacement device
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [md PATCH 05/16] md: create externally visible flags for supporting hot-replace.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [md PATCH 04/16] md: change hot_remove_disk to take an rdev rather than a number.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [md PATCH 03/16] md: remove test for duplicate device when setting slot number.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [md PATCH 02/16] md: take after reference to mddev during sysfs access.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [md PATCH 01/16] md: refine interpretation of "hold_active == UNTIL_IOCTL".
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [md PATCH 00/16] hot-replace support for RAID4/5/6
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- PULL REQUEST md updates for 3.2
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] util.c: two typos fixed
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Rotating RAID 1
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm r/w operations without TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY()
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm r/w operations without TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY()
- From: Michal Soltys <soltys@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] util.c: two typos fixed
- From: Lukasz Dorau <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Rotating RAID 1
- From: linbloke <linbloke@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [systemd-devel] systemd kills mdmon if it was started manually by user
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Bad block management - which mdadm?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Converting from Raid 5 to 6
- From: Michael Busby <michael.a.busby@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Converting from Raid 5 to 6
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Converting from Raid 5 to 6
- From: Michael Busby <michael.a.busby@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Converting from Raid 5 to 6
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Bad block management - which mdadm?
- From: Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz <a.miskiewicz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Converting from Raid 5 to 6
- From: Michael Busby <michael.a.busby@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Converting from Raid 5 to 6
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Converting from Raid 5 to 6
- From: Michael Busby <michael.a.busby@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Converting from Raid 5 to 6
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- Converting from Raid 5 to 6
- From: Michael Busby <michael.a.busby@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [systemd-devel] systemd kills mdmon if it was started manually by user
- From: Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD devnode still present after 'remove' udev event, and mdadm reports 'does not appear to be active'
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: MD devnode still present after 'remove' udev event, and mdadm reports 'does not appear to be active'
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [systemd-devel] systemd kills mdmon if it was started manually by user
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice on build a RAID6
- From: Krzysztof Adamski <k@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice on build a RAID6
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] Remove race for starting container devices.
- From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fixes metadata while migrating from Raid 0 to Raid 10
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] Remove race for starting container devices.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: How to free devices held captive by failed arrays
- From: Harry Mangalam <hjm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to free devices held captive by failed arrays
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: How to free devices held captive by failed arrays
- From: Harry Mangalam <hjm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to free devices held captive by failed arrays
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm "Used Dev Size" on 3TB drives
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Advice on build a RAID6
- From: Krzysztof Adamski <k@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- How to free devices held captive by failed arrays
- From: Harry Mangalam <hjm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/1] Incremental() lock error handling
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 0/1] Incremental() additional locking fixes
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 1/2] Create() don't leave the lock hanging on error
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 2/2] Create() check malloc() return value
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH] array_try_spare(): missing map_unlock()
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 3/3] Hold the map lock while performing Assemble to avoid races with udev
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 2/3] Don't tell sysfs to launch the container as we are doing it ourselves
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 1/3] Remove race for starting container devices.
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH v2 0/3] Fix mdadm vs udev race in Incremental and Assemble
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- mdadm "Used Dev Size" on 3TB drives
- From: Andrew <andyukguy@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] imsm: fix: Fixes metadata after migration from Raid 0 to Raid 10
- From: Lukasz Orlowski <lukasz.orlowski@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] imsm: Moves metadata update code for spare activation to separate function
- From: Lukasz Orlowski <lukasz.orlowski@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] Fixes metadata while migrating from Raid 0 to Raid 10
- From: Lukasz Orlowski <lukasz.orlowski@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] Remove race for starting container devices.
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 3/3] Hold the map lock while performing Assemble to avoid races with udev
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 0/3] Fix mdadm vs udev race in Incremental and Assemble
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 2/3] Don't tell sysfs to launch the container as we are doing it ourselves
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: mdadm help
- From: Yathindra <ydev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm help
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- mdadm help
- From: Yathindra <ydev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] imsm: fix: prevent segfault in mark_failure
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] lib/raid6: Fix filename emitted in generated code
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: MD devnode still present after 'remove' udev event, and mdadm reports 'does not appear to be active'
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] imsm: fix: correct debug printing of the volume's name
- From: Lukasz Dorau <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD devnode still present after 'remove' udev event, and mdadm reports 'does not appear to be active'
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] imsm: fix: prevent segfault in mark_failure
- From: Lukasz Dorau <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md.c: trivial comment fix
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] md.c: trivial comment fix
- From: Chris Dunlop <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] MD: Allow restarting an interrupted incremental recovery.
- From: Andrei Warkentin <awarkentin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] MD: Allow restarting an interrupted incremental recovery.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Working TRIM for md RAID
- From: Alex Besogonov <alex.besogonov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] MD: Allow restarting an interrupted incremental recovery.
- From: Andrei Warkentin <awarkentin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] MD: Allow restarting an interrupted incremental recovery.
- From: Andrei Warkentin <awarkentin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] MD: Allow restarting an interrupted incremental recovery.
- From: Andrei Warkentin <awarkentin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] fix: imsm: prevent segfault in mark_failure
- From: "Dorau, Lukasz" <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm r/w operations without TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY()
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- FW: mdadm r/w operations without TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY()
- From: "Orlowski, Lukasz" <lukasz.orlowski@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] fix: imsm: prevent segfault in mark_failure
- From: Lukasz Dorau <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] IMSM do not assume prev + current map in same state means reshape
- From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH 0/1] IMSM do not assume prev + current map in same state means reshape
- From: "Kwolek, Adam" <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] MD: Allow restarting an interrupted incremental recovery.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] MD: Allow restarting an interrupted incremental recovery.
- From: Andrei Warkentin <andreiw@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC] MD: Allow restarting an interrupted incremental recovery.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/1] IMSM only run reshape if number of disks has changed
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 0/1] IMSM do not assume prev + current map in same state means reshape
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH] lib/raid6: Fix filename emitted in generated code
- From: Dan McGee <dpmcgee@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC] MD: Allow restarting an interrupted incremental recovery.
- From: Andrei Warkentin <awarkentin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Potential data rollback/corruption after drive failure and re-appearance
- From: "Moshe Melnikov" <moshe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC] MD: Allow restarting an interrupted incremental recovery.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [mdadm PATCH 2/2] Fix unterminated buffer after readlink() call
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Data recovery from linear array (Intel SS4000-E)
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Data recovery from linear array (Intel SS4000-E)
- From: Johannes Moos <jmoos@xxxxxx>
- Re: Data recovery from linear array (Intel SS4000-E)
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Data recovery from linear array (Intel SS4000-E)
- From: Johannes Moos <jmoos@xxxxxx>
- Re: Data recovery from linear array (Intel SS4000-E)
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Data recovery from linear array (Intel SS4000-E)
- From: Johannes Moos <jmoos@xxxxxx>
- 2 drive RAID10 rebuild issue
- From: Brad Campbell <lists2009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC] MD: Allow restarting an interrupted incremental recovery.
- From: "Andrei E. Warkentin" <andrey.warkentin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC] MD: Restart an interrupted incremental recovery.
- From: "Andrei E. Warkentin" <andrey.warkentin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Data recovery from linear array (Intel SS4000-E)
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Data recovery from linear array (Intel SS4000-E)
- From: Johannes Moos <jmoos@xxxxxx>
- [mdadm PATCH 2/2] Fix unterminated buffer after readlink() call
- From: Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [mdadm PATCH 1/2] Fix off-by-one in readlink() buffer size handling
- From: Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm --grow on raid1 returns nonzero
- From: Kevin W Monroe <kwmonroe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC] MD: Allow restarting an interrupted incremental recovery.
- From: Andrei Warkentin <andreiw@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC] MD: Restart an interrupted incremental recovery.
- From: "Andrei E. Warkentin" <andrey.warkentin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Odd booting problem
- From: Michal Soltys <soltys@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Odd booting problem
- From: maurice <mhilarius@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC] MD: Restart an interrupted incremental recovery.
- From: Andrei Warkentin <andreiw@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: some general md raid questions
- From: "Peter W. Morreale" <morreale@xxxxxxx>
- Re: some general md raid questions
- From: Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 1.X metadata: Resuming an interrupted incremental recovery for RAID1.
- From: "Andrei E. Warkentin" <andrey.warkentin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid5 to another raid level??
- From: Michael Busby <michael.a.busby@xxxxxxxxx>
- some general md raid questions
- From: "Peter W. Morreale" <morreale@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid5 to another raid level??
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid5 to another raid level??
- From: Michael Busby <michael.a.busby@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 1.X metadata: Resuming an interrupted incremental recovery for RAID1.
- From: "Andrei E. Warkentin" <andrey.warkentin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid5 to another raid level??
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: MD devnode still present after 'remove' udev event, and mdadm reports 'does not appear to be active'
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: 1.X metadata: Resuming an interrupted incremental recovery for RAID1.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- 1.X metadata: Resuming an interrupted incremental recovery for RAID1.
- From: "Andrei E. Warkentin" <andrey.warkentin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD devnode still present after 'remove' udev event, and mdadm reports 'does not appear to be active'
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Odd booting problem
- From: maurice <mhilarius@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md RAID10 questions
- From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md RAID10 questions
- Re: Raid5 to another raid level??
- From: Michael Busby <michael.a.busby@xxxxxxxxx>
- md RAID10 questions
- From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Odd booting problem
- From: Michal Soltys <soltys@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Odd booting problem
- From: Jim Schatzman <james.schatzman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Odd booting problem
- From: maurice <mhilarius@xxxxxxxxx>
- configuration questions & advice
- From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Thought about delayed sync
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- BUG: spinlock lockup while performing FS operations and detected stalls on CPUs / tasks.
- From: Валерий <paramonov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Thought about delayed sync
- From: Wakko Warner <wakko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Thought about delayed sync
- From: Thomas Fjellstrom <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Thought about delayed sync
- From: Wakko Warner <wakko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Thought about delayed sync
- From: Wakko Warner <wakko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Thought about delayed sync
- From: Alexander Kühn <alexander.kuehn@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Thought about delayed sync
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Thought about delayed sync
- From: Thomas Fjellstrom <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Thought about delayed sync
- From: Wakko Warner <wakko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to stress test an RAID 6 array?
- From: Gordon Henderson <gordon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: BUG: spinlock lockup while performing FS operations and detected stalls on CPUs / tasks.
- From: Jérôme Poulin <jeromepoulin@xxxxxxxxx>
- BUG: spinlock lockup while performing FS operations and detected stalls on CPUs / tasks.
- From: Валерий <paramonov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Odd booting problem
- From: maurice <mhilarius@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: BUG: spinlock lockup while performing FS operations
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: BUG: spinlock lockup while performing FS operations
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Clarification behind md 1.0 superblock resync_offset and recovery_offset?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Clarification behind md 1.0 superblock resync_offset and recovery_offset?
- From: "Andrei E. Warkentin" <andrey.warkentin@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] GCC compile fix: remove calculation of unused variable 'reservation'
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- BUG: spinlock lockup while performing FS operations
- From: Валерий <paramonov@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Always run Grow_continue() for started array.
- From: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PULLREQUEST] md bugfix for 3.1
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] Always run Grow_continue() for started array.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] imsm: always use set_migr_type to set type of migration
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Creating an md with 3TB drives.
- From: Jérôme Poulin <jeromepoulin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Creating an md with 3TB drives.
- From: Sebastian Muniz <sjmuniz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to stress test an RAID 6 array?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Does Linux support Intel Smart Response Technology?
- From: "Labun, Marcin" <Marcin.Labun@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] imsm: always use set_migr_type to set type of migration
- From: Przemyslaw Czarnowski <przemyslaw.hawrylewicz.czarnowski@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH 1/3] Always run Grow_continue() for started array.
- From: "Kwolek, Adam" <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Does Linux support Intel Smart Response Technology?
- From: "linux-raid" <linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Appropriate kernel group for IDE/ATA/SAS/SATA issues?
- From: Jim Schatzman <james.schatzman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Does Linux support Intel Smart Response Technology?
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Does Linux support Intel Smart Response Technology?
- From: "Guy Watkins" <Guy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] imsm: fix: correct adding and activation of spare disks
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] Set correct reshape restart position
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Linux RAID Wiki]
[ATA RAID]
[Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]
[Linux Block]
[Linux IDE]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux Hams]
[Device Mapper]
[Kernel]
[Linux Admin]
[Linux Net]
[GFS]
[RPM]
[git]
[Yosemite Forum]
[Linux Networking]