RE: [PATCH] md: Add ability for disable bad block management

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Menzel [mailto:pm.debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2011 1:23 PM
> To: Kwolek, Adam
> Cc: neilb@xxxxxxx; linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Ciechanowski, Ed; Labun,
> Marcin; Williams, Dan J
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] md: Add ability for disable bad block management
> 
> Dear Adam,
> 
> 
> Am Donnerstag, den 24.11.2011, 13:19 +0100 schrieb Adam Kwolek:
> > When external metadata doesn't support BBM, mdadm cannot answer
> > correctly for BBM requests. It causes reshape process being stopped.
> >
> > Add ability for external metadata /mdadm/ to disable BBM via sysfs.
> > md will ignore bad blocks as it is for metadata v0.90.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> >  drivers/md/md.c |   11 ++++++++++-
> >  1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c index 266e82e..6591108
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/md.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
> > @@ -2935,7 +2935,16 @@ static ssize_t bb_show(struct md_rdev *rdev,
> > char *page)  }  static ssize_t bb_store(struct md_rdev *rdev, const
> > char *page, size_t len)  {
> > -	int rv = badblocks_store(&rdev->badblocks, page, len, 0);
> > +	int rv;
> > +
> > +	/* disable bad blocks managment
> 
> manag*e*ment
> 
> > +	 */
> > +	if (strstr(page, "disable") == page) {
> > +		bb->shift = -1;
> > +		return len;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	rv = badblocks_store(&rdev->badblocks, page, len, 0);
> >  	/* Maybe that ack was all we needed */
> >  	if (test_and_clear_bit(BlockedBadBlocks, &rdev->flags))
> >  		wake_up(&rdev->blocked_wait);
> 
> Also this seems to collide with PATCH 11/11, does not it?
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Paul

In my opinion it doesn't.
Patch 11/11 in mdadm allows for disabling BBM per rdev by setting 'disable' word in sysfs.
This patch interprets in md this action and disables BBM (per rdev also) .

Do you agree?

BR
Adam



��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{����w��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux