GCC Help

• Thread Index

• Suppressing Cast-qual Warnings
  • From: Andrew Talbot <Andrew.Talbot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Trying to understand inconsistent behaviour with -ftrapv (and an ICE)
  • From: Harald van Dijk <truedfx@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc binary format output
  • From: Victor Roman Archidona <daijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building OS independant cross compilers (for ia64)
  • From: Tom Bachmann <e_mc_h2@xxxxxx>
• Re: strength reduction and other optimizations
  • From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: strength reduction and other optimizations
  • From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: strength reduction and other optimizations
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• strength reduction and other optimizations
  • From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: yacc Error when building GCC from source tar
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Error during make bootstrap (gcc-4.1.1)
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Building OS independant cross compilers (for ia64)
  • From: Tom Bachmann <e_mc_h2@xxxxxx>
• Re: bad C code or bad object code ?
  • From: Harald van Dijk <truedfx@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: bad C code or bad object code ?
  • From: Volker Reichelt <reichelt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• yacc Error when building GCC from source tar
  • From: "sean yang" <seanatpurdue@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Error during make bootstrap (gcc-4.1.1)
  • From: "Santosh Sugur" <santosh.sugur@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Failed on 'make install'
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Failed on 'make install'
  • From: Thomas Lavergne <thomas.lavergne@xxxxxx>
• Re: Inconsistent floating point result when using G++ 3.3.6 with option -O0 or -O1 separately
  • From: Tim Prince <timothyprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: bad C code or bad object code ?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Inconsistent floating point result when using G++ 3.3.6 with option -O0 or -O1 separately
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Inconsistent floating point result when using G++ 3.3.6 with option -O0 or -O1 separately
  • From: "Deng Shi" <Deng.Shi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Inconsistent floating point result when using G++ 3.3.6 with option -O0 or -O1 separately
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Gcc 4.x crosscompiler running on cygwin
  • From: Raphael Zulliger <zulliger@xxxxxxxx>
• Inconsistent floating point result when using G++ 3.3.6 with option -O0 or -O1 separately
  • From: "Deng Shi" <Deng.Shi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: bad C code or bad object code ?
  • From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• bad C code or bad object code ?
  • From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Misc questions regarding shared objects
  • From: "Wang,Yi" <netantz@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Misc questions regarding shared objects
  • From: "Wang,Yi" <netantz@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Misc questions regarding shared objects
  • From: Thomas Ackermann <tja@xxxxxxxxx>
• Misc questions regarding shared objects
  • From: "Eugene Work0" <ework0@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: implicit void arguments not checked?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: implicit void arguments not checked?
  • From: florin@xxxxxxxxx (Florin Iucha)
• Re: gcc binary format output
  • From: Kai Ruottu <karuottu@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help with debugging LD_PRELOADed shared C libraries
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Help with debugging LD_PRELOADed shared C libraries
  • From: Thomas Ackermann <tja@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: implicit void arguments not checked?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Arm soft-float and hard-float query
  • From: "Spen" <spen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• help with debugging LD_PRELOADed shared C libraries
  • From: Thomas Ackermann <tja@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc binary format output
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: register usage
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc binary format output
  • From: Kai Ruottu <karuottu@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: register usage
  • From: "Petar Bajic" <petar.bajic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• implicit void arguments not checked?
  • From: florin@xxxxxxxxx (Florin Iucha)
• Re: floating point warnings, and gcc 4 warnings in general
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: adding movz to machine description
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with libg2c
  • From: Tim Prince <timothyprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC object files and Microsoft linker
  • From: Tim Prince <timothyprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC object files and Microsoft linker
  • From: "Timothy C Prince" <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Headers not precompiling
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Wrong virtual method called (bug?)
  • From: David Fang <fang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Wrong virtual method called (bug?)
  • From: "michid@xxxxxxxxx" <michid@xxxxxxxxx>
• Headers not precompiling
  • From: "Mark Wagner" <carnildo@xxxxxxxxx>
• GCC object files and Microsoft linker
  • From: Maurício <briqueabraque@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.0.2, Fedora C4 problem
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: gcc 4.0.2, Fedora C4 problem
  • From: "Brian D. McGrew" <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc 4.0.2, Fedora C4 problem
  • From: Michael Gatford <michael.gatford@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• floating point warnings, and gcc 4 warnings in general
  • From: "Scott Lipcon" <slipcon@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: register usage
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: adding movz to machine description
  • From: "Petar Bajic" <petar.bajic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• register usage
  • From: "Petar Bajic" <petar.bajic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc binary format output
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: using GCC on RHEL3
  • From: Marco Trudel <mtrudel@xxxxxx>
• Re: gcc binary format output
  • From: Victor Roman Archidona <daijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• using GCC on RHEL3
  • From: "Sunil C" <sunil.c@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Problem with libg2c
  • From: Athichart Tangpong <tangpong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc binary format output
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: how does cc1plus work internally
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• how does cc1plus work internally
  • From: "Yu Yang" <yuyang08@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc binary format output
  • From: Victor Roman Archidona <daijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling applications for the new SMP processors
  • From: "Olivier Delannoy" <olivier.delannoy@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: MySQL Questions.
  • From: Artūras Moskvinas <arturas.moskvinas@xxxxxxxxx>
• MySQL Questions.
  • From: Rob Waldrum <rob.waldrum@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling applications for the new SMP processors
  • From: Tim Prince <timothyprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Glibc Versioned Symbols
  • From: "Browder, Tom" <Tom.Browder@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Compiling applications for the new SMP processors
  • From: "Jerin Joy" <jerinjoy@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -fno-delayed-branch and the bne-instruction on MIPS
  • From: Simon Kagstrom <simon.kagstrom@xxxxxx>
• Re: Glibc Versioned Symbols
  • From: bob@xxxxxxxxxx (Bob Proulx)
• Re: std::tr1::function wierdness
  • From: Christoph Bartoschek <bartoschek@xxxxxx>
• Re: Glibc Versioned Symbols
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC is freezing when compiling a big TU with the -g option
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: x86 Segment register use
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Glibc Versioned Symbols
  • From: "Browder, Tom" <Tom.Browder@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -fno-delayed-branch and the bne-instruction on MIPS
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: x86 Segment register use
  • From: David Fernandez <dfernandez@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: x86 Segment register use
  • From: David Fernandez <dfernandez@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: x86 Segment register use
  • From: "Young, Michael" <Michael.Young@xxxxxxxxxx>
• std::tr1::function wierdness
  • From: "Adrian Harris" <adrian.harris@xxxxxxx>
• RE: GCC is freezing when compiling a big TU with the -g option
  • From: "Olivier Langlois" <olanglois@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: GCC Compile Failure
  • From: "Young, Michael" <Michael.Young@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: why segfault when parameter is not "int" and is "unsigned long long int"
  • From: Fran <prog1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: using GCC on winXP
  • From: Kai Ruottu <karuottu@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: using GCC on winXP
  • From: Kai Ruottu <karuottu@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: x86 Segment register use
  • From: Tim Prince <timothyprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: using GCC on winXP
  • From: Tim Prince <timothyprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: using GCC on winXP
  • From: Marco Trudel <mtrudel@xxxxxx>
• Re: using GCC on winXP
  • From: Mangal Pandey <gcc_help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• why segfault when parameter is not "int" and is "unsigned long long int"
  • From: Fran <prog1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: GCC is freezing when compiling a big TU with the -g option
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: using GCC on winXP
  • From: Marco Trudel <mtrudel@xxxxxx>
• Re: using GCC on winXP
  • From: "Sisyphus" <sisyphus1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• x86 Segment register use
  • From: David Fernandez <dfernandez@xxxxxxxxx>
• using GCC on winXP
  • From: Mangal Pandey <gcc_help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Gcc 4.x crosscompiler running on cygwin
  • From: Kai Ruottu <karuottu@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: -fno-delayed-branch and the bne-instruction on MIPS
  • From: Simon Kagstrom <simon.kagstrom@xxxxxx>
• RE: GCC is freezing when compiling a big TU with the -g option
  • From: "Olivier Langlois" <olanglois@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc compiler help
  • From: Tim Prince <timothyprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc compiler help
  • From: Ben Dean <benjamin.dean@xxxxxxxx>
• problem in gcc port based on MIPS
  • From: "kernel coder" <lhrkernelcoder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Build Problems: AIX 5.2, GCC 4.0.2, xlC 8.0
  • From: Perry Smith <pedz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: GCC is freezing when compiling a big TU with the -g option
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC Compile Failure
  • From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC Compile Failure
  • From: David Fang <fang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC Compile Failure
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC Compile Failure
  • From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC Compile Failure
  • From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC Compile Failure
  • From: Artūras Moskvinas <arturas.moskvinas@xxxxxxxxx>
• GCC Compile Failure
  • From: jjdevine <jjdevine@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Linking C functions into C++ objects
  • From: iamatul@xxxxxxxxxxx
• RE: GCC is freezing when compiling a big TU with the -g option
  • From: "Olivier Langlois" <olanglois@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char *'
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char *'
  • From: Tim Prince <timothyprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: BFD error
  • From: Tim Prince <timothyprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: BFD error
  • From: "Phil taddei" <phillyla@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char *'
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Re: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char *'
  • From: "Timothy C Prince" <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: GCC is freezing when compiling a big TU with the -g option
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: GCC is freezing when compiling a big TU with the -g option
  • From: "Olivier Langlois" <olanglois@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: GCC is freezing when compiling a big TU with the -g option
  • From: "Meissner, Michael" <michael.meissner@xxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC is freezing when compiling a big TU with the -g option
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• GCC is freezing when compiling a big TU with the -g option
  • From: "Olivier Langlois" <olanglois@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: adding movz to machine description
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -fno-delayed-branch and the bne-instruction on MIPS
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char *'
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Gcc 4.x crosscompiler running on cygwin
  • From: Marco Trudel <mtrudel@xxxxxx>
• Gcc 4.x crosscompiler running on cygwin
  • From: Raphael Zulliger <zulliger@xxxxxxxx>
• adding movz to machine description
  • From: "Petar Bajic" <petar.bajic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char *'
  • From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char *'
  • From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Help required for c to VCG GDL flow chart
  • From: "Sharad Pratap" <sh4r4d@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: crosscompiler host = i686 linux-gnu(athlon) ,target = dec alpha (for producing tru64 alpha binaries)
  • From: Kai Ruottu <karuottu@xxxxxxxx>
• -fno-delayed-branch and the bne-instruction on MIPS
  • From: Simon Kagstrom <simon.kagstrom@xxxxxx>
• Re: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char *'
  • From: Tim Prince <timothyprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Gcc3.2 build error on Solaris 10
  • From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Gcc3.2 build error on Solaris 10
  • From: "Dan Keating" <dan.keating@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char *'
  • From: Tim Prince <timothyprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Gcc3.2 build error on Solaris 10
  • From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• crosscompiler host = i686 linux-gnu(athlon) ,target = dec alpha (for producing tru64 alpha binaries)
  • From: "kiran Pakala" <kiran.pakala@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char *'
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char *'
  • From: "Timothy C Prince" <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Gcc3.2 build error on Solaris 10
  • From: "Dan Keating" <dan.keating@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc c++ option
  • From: William Estrada <MrUmunhum@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• rexx on amd64 wont compile: skipping incompatible
  • From: askmarkus <ml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: trying to understand: "warning: function declaration isn't a prototype"
  • From: Jay Vaughan <jv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trying to understand: "warning: function declaration isn't a prototype"
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: trying to understand: "warning: function declaration isn't a prototype"
  • From: "John Yates" <jyates@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trying to understand: "warning: function declaration isn't a prototype"
  • From: Ingo Krabbe <ikrabbe.ask@xxxxxx>
• Re: trying to understand: "warning: function declaration isn't a prototype"
  • From: Ingo Krabbe <ikrabbe.ask@xxxxxx>
• Re: trying to understand: "warning: function declaration isn't a prototype"
  • From: Jay Vaughan <jv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: issue with gcc 4.x optimizations
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: BFD error
  • From: Kai Ruottu <karuottu@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: issue with gcc 4.x optimizations
  • From: Martin Quinson <martin.quinson@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: issue with gcc 4.x optimizations
  • From: Martin Quinson <martin.quinson@xxxxxxxx>
• BFD error
  • From: "Phil taddei" <phillyla@xxxxxxxxx>
• -mcpu=v9 -mvis error on Solaris 8/SPARC with gcc-3.4.3
  • From: Albert Chin <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trying to understand: "warning: function declaration isn't a prototype"
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trying to understand: "warning: function declaration isn't a prototype"
  • From: Jay Vaughan <jv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Gcc3.2 build error on Solaris 10
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trying to understand: "warning: function declaration isn't a prototype"
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: issue with gcc 4.x optimizations
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• trying to understand: "warning: function declaration isn't a prototype"
  • From: Jay Vaughan <jv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: issue with gcc 4.x optimizations
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Declaration not in namespace surrounding '::'
  • From: Roger Ferrer Ibáñez <roger.ferrer@xxxxxx>
• Re: EABI version error
  • From: Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Profiling with g++
  • From: "Carlos Marcelino Casas Cuadrado" <cmcasas@xxxxxx>
• issue with gcc 4.x optimizations
  • From: Martin Quinson <martin.quinson@xxxxxxxx>
• Gcc3.2 build error on Solaris 10
  • From: "Dan Keating" <dan.keating@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Profiling with g++
  • From: Tim Prince <timothyprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• EABI version error
  • From: rtariq <rtariq@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC Installation
  • From: Marco Trudel <mtrudel@xxxxxx>
• GCC Installation
  • From: "Fan, Fenghui " <fefan@xxxxxxxx>
• RE: Profiling with g++
  • From: "Carlos Marcelino Casas Cuadrado" <cmcasas@xxxxxx>
• -O and other optimization flags
  • From: zhou13@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Using the -D flag on Windows
  • From: Stefan Karlsson <stefan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Building gcc-4.1.1
  • From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Makefile issue
  • From: "Parikshat Dubey" <parikshatdubey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Malformed pragma message
  • From: <mpowell@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Flags -g and -O give very different results
  • From: Brian Gough <bjg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Flags -g and -O give very different results
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• howto disable fixincludes in gcc-4.1.1?
  • From: "f.l." <texlexsex@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc-4.1.1
  • From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc-4.1.1
  • From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc-4.1.1
  • From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc-4.1.1
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc-4.1.1
  • From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc-4.1.1
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Building gcc-4.1.1
  • From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Flags -g and -O give very different results
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Flags -g and -O give very different results
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Flags -g and -O give very different results
  • From: Tim Prince <timothyprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Flags -g and -O give very different results
  • From: Michael P Friedlander <mpf@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Flags -g and -O give very different results
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• explaination of some gcc functions
  • From: "kernel coder" <lhrkernelcoder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Flags -g and -O give very different results
  • From: Michael P Friedlander <mpf@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] Making double precision constants work with -fsingle-precision-constant [was: Re: current subversion (rev 115032) compiling issues]
  • From: Marco Trudel <mtrudel@xxxxxx>
• help with gcc 2.8.1 macro definition
  • From: "girish hilage" <girish_hilage@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• howto remove /usr/include from standard include dir?
  • From: "f.l." <texlexsex@xxxxxxxxx>
• Can't build gcc-4.1.1
  • From: "Bill McEnaney" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Which gcc tar file to be used for SGI Altix 350?
  • From: nlkabilan@xxxxxxxxxx
• can I force linking to older libstdc++?
  • From: sew2111@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• gcc linker error
  • From: rtariq <rtariq@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Symbols which were not used, still in binary
  • From: Ingo Krabbe <ikrabbe.ask@xxxxxx>
• Re: Gcc 3.4.6 Build error
  • From: bob@xxxxxxxxxx (Bob Proulx)
• Re: Address of label which is defined within an asm statement?
  • From: "Ioannis E. Venetis" <venetis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Symbols which were not used, still in binary
  • From: Steve Kreyer <steve.kreyer@xxxxxx>
• Re: Symbols which were not used, still in binary
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Symbols which were not used, still in binary
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Symbols which were not used, still in binary
  • From: Michael Eager <eager@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Symbols which were not used, still in binary
  • From: Steve Kreyer <steve.kreyer@xxxxxx>
• Re: mmx/sse builtins
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: discard a weak symbol in object file
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Gcc 3.4.6 Build error
  • From: "Mcgovern, Matthew CIV NAVAIR 521420E" <matthew.mcgovern@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Gcc 3.4.6 Build error
  • From: bob@xxxxxxxxxx (Bob Proulx)
• Re: [PATCH] Making double precision constants work with -fsingle-precision-constant [was: Re: current subversion (rev 115032) compiling issues]
  • From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmx/sse builtins
  • From: "Brian Budge" <brian.budge@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Address of label which is defined within an asm statement?
  • From: David Fernandez <dfernandez@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmx/sse builtins
  • From: Tim Prince <timothyprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmx/sse builtins
  • From: "Brian Budge" <brian.budge@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Gcc 3.4.6 Build error
  • From: "Mcgovern, Matthew CIV NAVAIR 521420E" <matthew.mcgovern@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Address of label which is defined within an asm statement?
  • From: "Ioannis E. Venetis" <venetis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• mmx/sse builtins
  • From: "Matthieu Godet" <matthieu.godet.work@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: error occured when cross compiling gcc
  • From: "Rupert Wood" <me@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error occured when cross compiling gcc
  • From: Tim Prince <timothyprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] Making double precision constants work with -fsingle-precision-constant [was: Re: current subversion (rev 115032) compiling issues]
  • From: Marco Trudel <mtrudel@xxxxxx>
• Re: Gcc 3.4.6 Build error
  • From: bob@xxxxxxxxxx (Bob Proulx)
• discard a weak symbol in object file
  • From: Wolfgang Haidinger <Wolfgang.Haidinger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Address of label which is defined within an asm statement?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error occured when cross compiling gcc
  • From: "Luo Yong" <yong.personal.mail@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error occured when cross compiling gcc
  • From: Tim Prince <timothyprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• error occured when cross compiling gcc
  • From: "Luo Yong" <yong.personal.mail@xxxxxxxxx>
• Gcc 3.4.6 Build error
  • From: "Mcgovern, Matthew CIV NAVAIR 521420E" <matthew.mcgovern@xxxxxxxx>
• Address of label which is defined within an asm statement?
  • From: "Ioannis E. Venetis" <venetis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Template parameters problem
  • From: Pierre Chatelier <pierre.chatelier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Template parameters problem
  • From: Oliver Kullmann <O.Kullmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Template parameters problem
  • From: Pierre Chatelier <pierre.chatelier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• -mcpu=v9 -mvis error on Solaris 8/SPARC with gcc-3.4.3
  • From: Albert Chin <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: question about gcc assembly
  • From: "Coline Lelong-Pantel" <coline.lelong-pantel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: question about gcc assembly
  • From: Tim Prince <timothyprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• current subversion (rev 115032) compiling issues
  • From: Marco Trudel <mtrudel@xxxxxx>
• Re: Qn regarding building an application of smallest size for ARM-11 using gcc
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• question about gcc assembly
  • From: "Coline Lelong-Pantel" <coline.lelong-pantel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Qn regarding building an application of smallest size for ARM-11 using gcc
  • From: Ingo Krabbe <ikrabbe.ask@xxxxxx>
• Qn regarding building an application of smallest size for ARM-11 using gcc
  • From: Binesh <bbinesh@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: STL, hash_map is sorted !!
  • From: Mohammad Shojatalab <shoja@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: STL, hash_map is sorted !!
  • From: "Brian Budge" <brian.budge@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: STL, hash_map is sorted !!
  • From: "Noel Yap" <noel.yap@xxxxxxxxx>
• STL, hash_map is sorted !!
  • From: Mohammad Shojatalab <shoja@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with private copy constructor
  • From: Mathias Froehlich <M.Froehlich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with private copy constructor
  • From: "corey taylor" <corey.taylor@xxxxxxxxx>
• Problem with private copy constructor
  • From: Mathias Froehlich <M.Froehlich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: c-parser.y
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• c-parser.y
  • From: "Wang,Yi" <netantz@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Preventing a biarch build
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Preventing a biarch build
  • From: Sidney Cadot <sidney@xxxxxxxxx>
• undefined reference to `__i686.get_pc_thunk.dx'
  • From: "Wenyan Dong" <Wenyan.Dong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC compile issues
  • From: Tim Prince <timothyprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• GCC compile issues
  • From: Ross Cameron <ross.cameron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: MinGW build of gcc 4.1.1
  • From: FX Coudert <fxcoudert@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: LOTS of failures when making check for gfortran--is it Ok?
  • From: Tim Prince <timothyprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: LOTS of failures when making check for gfortran--is it Ok?
  • From: tobias.schlueter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Problem regarding build and configure
  • From: Niklaus <niklaus@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: LOTS of failures when making check for gfortran--is it Ok?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• LOTS of failures when making check for gfortran--is it Ok?
  • From: "sean yang" <seanatpurdue@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Problem regarding build and configure
  • From: "jyoti chhabra" <u04114@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 32-bit memory models
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 'make check' errors when '--enable-languages=c,fortran'
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• 32-bit memory models
  • From: "Young, Michael" <Michael.Young@xxxxxxxxxx>
• 'make check' errors when '--enable-languages=c,fortran'
  • From: "sean yang" <seanatpurdue@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: sizeof() return type ?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -O or -g on gcc linker frontend?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• sizeof() return type ?
  • From: Darryl Miles <darryl-mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: !(fun) with tls
  • From: NZG <ngustavson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -O or -g on gcc linker frontend?
  • From: "Charles L. Farbstein" <charles.farbstein@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: !(fun) with tls
  • From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: !(fun) with tls
  • From: Niklaus <niklaus@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -O or -g on gcc linker frontend?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Maximum Allocatable Dynamic Memory
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Disabling Instruction scheduling
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Segmentation faults with static linking
  • From: <Jon.Barks@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• -O or -g on gcc linker frontend?
  • From: Gerhard Theurich <gtheurich@xxxxxxx>
• Maximum Allocatable Dynamic Memory
  • From: sonatabar bar <sonatabar@xxxxxxxxx>
• Disabling Instruction scheduling
  • From: "Pavan Kumar P." <pavankumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: xgcc unable to build libgcc under mingw
  • From: "Alexander Shabanov" <avshabanov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: xgcc unable to build libgcc under mingw
  • From: Niklaus <niklaus@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: xgcc unable to build libgcc under mingw
  • From: Tim Prince <timothyprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• i686-unknown-winnt target not defined
  • From: Niklaus <niklaus@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: new asembler command for AVR port
  • From: <john.gill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• new asembler command for AVR port
  • From: Piotr Pałka <Piotr.Palka@xxxxxxxx>
• xgcc unable to build libgcc under mingw
  • From: "Alexander Shabanov" <avshabanov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Installing gcc
  • From: Gunnar Sjoo <botelgubben@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: What is the address of this line?
  • From: Ingo Krabbe <ikrabbe.ask@xxxxxx>
• Re: Help needed for installing gcc 4.0.3
  • From: Kai Ruottu <karuottu@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Porting gcc
  • From: "kernel coder" <lhrkernelcoder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Installing gcc
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Installing gcc
  • From: Kai Ruottu <karuottu@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help needed for installing gcc 4.0.3
  • From: Kai Ruottu <karuottu@xxxxxxxx>
• Installing gcc
  • From: Gunnar Sjoo <botelgubben@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: What is the address of this line?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Adding a library
  • From: Ingo Krabbe <ikrabbe.ask@xxxxxx>
• Re: Help needed for installing gcc 4.0.3
  • From: "熊俊" <xiongjun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Adding a library
  • From: "Vivek Katakam" <vivek1717@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What is the address of this line?
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ColdFire support by gcc
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Forking a Process
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Error message for 'ambiguous overload for operator>>' in gcc 4.1.0
  • From: am611@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Error message for 'ambiguous overload for operator>>' in gcc 4.1.0
  • From: "Brian Budge" <brian.budge@xxxxxxxxx>
• GCC 4.2
  • From: Philippe Laporte <philippe.laporte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help needed for installing gcc 4.0.3
  • From: Kai Ruottu <karuottu@xxxxxxxx>
• What is the address of this line?
  • From: John Carter <john.carter@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Help needed for installing gcc 4.0.3
  • From: "熊俊" <xiongjun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Error message for 'ambiguous overload for operator>>' in gcc 4.1.0
  • From: Andrew McLean <am611@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• ColdFire support by gcc
  • From: "John Horton" <john_horton80@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Debug cpp
  • From: Jeffrey Holle <jeffreyholle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How can I compile on new system und run it on old one ?
  • From: Monteaup <m_cz@xxxxxx>
• Forking a Process
  • From: Christian Heller <christian.heller@xxxxxxxxx>
• Debug cpp
  • From: Henrik Holle <holle@xxxxxxxxx>
• libcpp -> where is the handling for defines?
  • From: Henrik Holle <holle@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: reg : help with building gcc-g++ 3.2.2
  • From: Daniel Llorens del Río <daniel.llorensdelrio@xxxxxxx>
• reg : help with building gcc-g++ 3.2.2
  • From: "kiran Pakala" <kiran.pakala@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to turn off a warning in a file
  • From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How can I compile on new system und run it on old one ?
  • From: Tim Prince <timothyprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to turn off a warning in a file
  • From: "Paulo J. Matos" <pocmatos@xxxxxxxxx>
• How can I compile on new system und run it on old one ?
  • From: Monteaup <m_cz@xxxxxx>
• Re: order of declared filed in a struct
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• order of declared filed in a struct
  • From: "Wang,Yi" <netantz@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Code Flow for RTL generation
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc4.0.2---gfortran can't be compiled
  • From: Tim Prince <timothyprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Get know heap usage of program modules
  • From: "steven woody" <narkewoody@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc4.0.2---gfortran can't be compiled
  • From: "sean yang" <seanatpurdue@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: c++ library error while building Gcc4.0.2
  • From: "sean yang" <seanatpurdue@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: c++ library error while building Gcc4.0.2
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• c++ library error while building Gcc4.0.2
  • From: "sean yang" <seanatpurdue@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC4 x86_64 pushfl / pop %eax inline asm ?
  • From: Darryl Miles <darryl-mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC4 x86_64 pushfl / pop %eax inline asm ?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• GCC4 x86_64 pushfl / pop %eax inline asm ?
  • From: Darryl Miles <darryl-mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc 3.4.5 on x86 Solaris 9
  • From: Kai Ruottu <karuottu@xxxxxxxx>
• GCC ARM Linker Problem
  • From: Kanwal Preet Singh CHANANA <kanwalpreet.singh@xxxxxx>
• Re: How to turn off a warning in a file
  • From: Christoph Bartoschek <bartoschek@xxxxxx>
• i386 instruction
  • From: "Amruta G. Gokhale" <amruta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Porting gcc
  • From: Piotr Pałka <piopalka@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Thank you for doc on Linux Kernel Module Programming Guide
  • From: Flavio <ff@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to turn off a warning in a file
  • From: Perry Smith <pedz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Fwd: Re: Re: How to turn off a warning in a file
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Fwd: Re: Re: How to turn off a warning in a file
  • From: robbie.doggie@xxxxxxx
• Re: How to turn off a warning in a file
  • From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• How to turn off a warning in a file
  • From: robbie.doggie@xxxxxxx
• Re: asm instruction
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• asm instruction
  • From: "Muthu, Pushparaj IN GGN SISL" <Pushparaj.Muthu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to type-pun and why
  • From: Mattias Engdegård <mattias@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to type-pun and why
  • From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to type-pun and why
  • From: Perry Smith <pedz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to type-pun and why
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to type-pun and why
  • From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• How to type-pun and why
  • From: Mattias Engdegård <mattias@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• ARM Linker Problem
  • From: Kanwal Preet Singh CHANANA <kanwalpreet.singh@xxxxxx>
• Re: -fpic vs fPIC
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -fpic vs fPIC
  • From: Hiroki Kaminaga <kaminaga@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -fpic vs fPIC
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• -fpic vs fPIC
  • From: Hiroki Kaminaga <kaminaga@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g77/gfortran incompatibilities---name mangling
  • From: Tim Prince <timothyprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Fortran compiler in GCC--- is there a 'g77' being generated from 4.0.2?
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• g77/gfortran incompatibilities---name mangling
  • From: "sean yang" <seanatpurdue@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Fortran compiler in GCC--- is there a 'g77' being generated from 4.0.2?
  • From: "sean yang" <seanatpurdue@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Building gcc 3.4.5 on x86 Solaris 9
  • From: "Ghost Ghost" <ghost_srilanka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linking problem with gfortran 4.2.0
  • From: Harry Powell <harry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linking problem with gfortran 4.2.0
  • From: Tim Prince <timothyprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What is 'VTT' and 'construction vtable'?
  • From: GerhardT <trg01@xxxxxx>
• Re: What is 'VTT' and 'construction vtable'?
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• What is 'VTT' and 'construction vtable'?
  • From: GerhardT <trg01@xxxxxx>
• Re: Installing multilib on x86_64*-linux* with 32-bit libs to lib32 and 64-bit libs to lib
  • From: Albert Chin <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Constant at a defined address
  • From: Phildale <Pdale@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linking problem with gfortran 4.2.0
  • From: Harry Powell <harry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: what cflag/march to use for intel core duo l2400?
  • From: Tim Prince <timothyprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: what cflag/march to use for intel core duo l2400?
  • From: George Nychis <gnychis@xxxxxxx>
• ASM + CPP with gcc/gpp
  • From: revis <wounded2@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Constant at a defined address
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• C preprocessor For loops ?
  • From: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@xxxxxxxxx>
• Constant at a defined address
  • From: Phildale <Pdale@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Wide character conversion
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Installing multilib on x86_64*-linux* with 32-bit libs to lib32 and 64-bit libs to lib
  • From: Albert Chin <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Wide character conversion
  • From: "romyd misc" <romydmisc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Installing multilib on x86_64*-linux* with 32-bit libs to lib32 and 64-bit libs to lib
  • From: Kai Ruottu <karuottu@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: what cflag/march to use for intel core duo l2400?
  • From: Tim Prince <timothyprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• what cflag/march to use for intel core duo l2400?
  • From: George Nychis <gnychis@xxxxxxx>
• Re: what's the meaning of the warning "instantiated from here"
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: what's the meaning of the warning "instantiated from here"
  • From: hj <hj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Problems building gcc-4.0.2 on zSuSE 9
  • From: Eric Weinstein <eric@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: what's the meaning of the warning "instantiated from here"
  • From: "Brian Budge" <brian.budge@xxxxxxxxx>
• what's the meaning of the warning "instantiated from here"
  • From: hj <hj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Error during Pro*C compilation
  • From: Rachit.Verma@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Error during Pro*C compilation
  • From: Sven Eschenberg <eschenb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RTL explaination
  • From: "kernel coder" <lhrkernelcoder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Making gcc silent for third-party headers
  • From: Alon Marx <alon@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Error during Pro*C compilation
  • From: Rachit.Verma@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Installing multilib on x86_64*-linux* with 32-bit libs to lib32 and 64-bit libs to lib
  • From: Kai Ruottu <karuottu@xxxxxxxx>
• Installing multilib on x86_64*-linux* with 32-bit libs to lib32 and 64-bit libs to lib
  • From: Albert Chin <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Cross compiler help
  • From: Kai Ruottu <karuottu@xxxxxxxx>
• Cross compiler help
  • From: "Doug Broadwell" <doug@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• build gcc-4.1.1 on i386-apple-darwin8.6.1
  • From: Tim Campbell <tim.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Error during Pro*C compilation
  • From: Sven Eschenberg <eschenb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Error during Pro*C compilation
  • From: Rachit.Verma@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: extern question
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extern question
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• How can I have a combination combination of debug build and compiler's optimization warnings
  • From: Michalis Giannakidis <mgiann@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extern question
  • From: Aseem Rastogi <aseem@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extern question
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extern question
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• extern question
  • From: "Trevis Rothwell" <tjr@xxxxxxx>
• Exception Handling g++
  • From: "Chappidi, Sudhakar" <chappidi.sudhakar@xxxxxx>
• Re: CTORs for static elements
  • From: Ingo Krabbe <ikrabbe.ask@xxxxxx>
• HELP With Slow SSE Code
  • From: bobk <bobklepko@xxxxxxxxx>
• CTORs for static elements
  • From: Perry Smith <pedz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Resolving Multiple Vtables
  • From: Eric Lemings <eric.lemings@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: compiling gcc under mingw
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• compiling gcc under mingw
  • From: "Alexander Shabanov" <avshabanov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gprof: gmon.out file is missing call-graph data (I'm using -pg)
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++ linking problem
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• gprof: gmon.out file is missing call-graph data (I'm using -pg)
  • From: Zohar Levi <zoharl3@xxxxxxxxx>
• g++ linking problem
  • From: S3 <stein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Another hang with 4.1.1 in the perl step of the make...
  • From: "Edward Otto" <edward.otto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building cross compiler for arm-elf
  • From: Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ISO C90 Compiler
  • From: Artūras Moskvinas <arturas.moskvinas@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ISO C90 Compiler
  • From: janlm <jan.michelsen@xxxxxx>
• Re: ISO C90 Compiler
  • From: "Jim Stapleton" <stapleton.41@xxxxxxxxx>
• ISO C90 Compiler
  • From: janlm <jan.michelsen@xxxxxx>
• gcc
  • From: Gunnar Sjoo <botelgubben@xxxxxxxx>
• gcov-kernel patch
  • From: "McLendon, Rodney" <Rodney.McLendon@xxxxxxx>
• Re: writting machine description for Mono
  • From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• building gcc problem
  • From: Daniel Van Dijke <vandijke@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Building GCC
  • From: "Flop Bucket" <flopbucket@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to force gcc to build always statically linked binaries?
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• How to force gcc to build always statically linked binaries?
  • From: "Ioannis E. Venetis" <venetis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Building cross compiler for arm-elf
  • From: "Flop Bucket" <flopbucket@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: specs file for 4.1.1
  • From: Gerhard Theurich <gtheurich@xxxxxxx>
• writting machine description for Mono
  • From: "Wang,Yi" <netantz@xxxxxxxxx>
• Making gcc silent for third-party headers
  • From: "Paulo J. Matos" <pocmatos@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: specs file for 4.1.1
  • From: Dave Murphy <wintermute2k4@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: openmp support
  • From: Tim Prince <timothyprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• make error for development branch
  • From: Thomas Yeh <tomyeh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Re: openmp support
  • From: Thomas Yeh <tomyeh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• specs file for 4.1.1
  • From: Gerhard Theurich <gtheurich@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Re: openmp support
  • From: "Timothy C Prince" <tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: openmp support
  • From: Thomas Yeh <tomyeh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -fpic option
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: openmp support
  • From: Tim Prince <timothyprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -fpic option
  • From: Tim Prince <timothyprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• -fpic option
  • From: "satyaakam goswami" <satyaakam@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ARM Inline Assembler and 64 bit variables
  • From: Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• openmp support
  • From: Thomas Yeh <tomyeh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ARM Inline Assembler and 64 bit variables
  • From: Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Problem when using gcc 4.1 + binutil 2.16.92 + glibc 2.4 + ARM EABI
  • From: "Fengwei Yin" <yfw.debian@xxxxxxxxx>
• GCC 4.0.3 Assembler (arm-elf-as) Error
  • From: Kanwal Preet Singh CHANANA <kanwalpreet.singh@xxxxxx>
• RE: FW: Problem building cross compiler gcc-4.0.3 for ARM using CYGWIN in Windows2000
  • From: Kanwal Preet Singh CHANANA <kanwalpreet.singh@xxxxxx>
• Re: Reg. sprintf
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Reg. sprintf
  • From: "Vivek Katakam" <vivek1717@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Reg. sprintf
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reg. sprintf
  • From: "Vivek Katakam" <vivek1717@xxxxxxxxx>
• GCC 3.3 bug: 'friend class ::D<int>' does not parse unless the "::" is removed
  • From: "Yuval Kfir" <yuvalk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 'make check' error
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• 'make check' error
  • From: Philippe Schaffnit <P.Schaffnit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• can't find malloc_allocator
  • From: "Alessandro Malgaroli" <alex.malgaroli@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: FW: Problem building cross compiler gcc-4.0.3 for ARM using CYGWIN in Windows2000
  • From: Kai Ruottu <karuottu@xxxxxxxx>
• RE: FW: Problem building cross compiler gcc-4.0.3 for ARM using CYGWIN in Windows2000
  • From: Kanwal Preet Singh CHANANA <kanwalpreet.singh@xxxxxx>
• Re: FW: Problem building cross compiler gcc-4.0.3 for ARM using CYGWIN in Windows2000
  • From: Kai Ruottu <karuottu@xxxxxxxx>
• FW: Problem building cross compiler gcc-4.0.3 for ARM using CYGWIN in Windows2000
  • From: Kanwal Preet Singh CHANANA <kanwalpreet.singh@xxxxxx>
• Problem building cross compiler gcc-4.0.3 for ARM using CYGWIN in Windows2000
  • From: Kanwal Preet Singh CHANANA <kanwalpreet.singh@xxxxxx>
• Instalation Issues
  • From: "Luis Pedro Montenegro" <lpmontenegro@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: weak-attribute over-optimisation with 4.1
  • From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc-4.2 build dies in autoconf
  • From: Tim Prince <timothyprince@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Barrier / atomic operations on multiprocessors.
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Barrier / atomic operations on multiprocessors.
  • From: Ray Whitmer <ray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem with catalog()
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc binary for fc1
  • From: "Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: gcc binary for fc1
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 3.4.4
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• GCC 3.4.4
  • From: "Fritz Jost" <fjost@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ISO C++
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: using #defines with asm
  • From: Phildale <Pdale@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: using #defines with asm
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• using #defines with asm
  • From: Phildale <Pdale@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Makefile Issue
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Makefile Issue
  • From: "Parikshat Dubey" <parikshatdubey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH needed for gcc-3.4.5 executable
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH needed for gcc-3.4.5 executable
  • From: "Digvijoy Chatterjee" <chatterjee.digvijoy@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C++ auto_ptr template query solved
  • From: "Digvijoy Chatterjee" <chatterjee.digvijoy@xxxxxxxxx>
• ISO C++
  • From: Mr Noone <freegoldbar@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem with catalog()
  • From: Mangal Pandey <gcc_help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• LD_LIBRARY_PATH needed for gcc-3.4.5 executable
  • From: "David M. O'Brien" <dmo61@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: functions calls Vs calls using function pointers
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: functions calls Vs calls using function pointers
  • From: "Digvijoy Chatterjee" <chatterjee.digvijoy@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mark.urs@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Kai Ruottu <karuottu@xxxxxxxx>
• mark.urs@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: "Mark U" <mark.urs@xxxxxxxxx>
• problem with catalog()
  • From: Mangal Pandey <gcc_help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Curious segmentation fault... SOLVED
  • From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: functions calls Vs calls using function pointers
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: functions calls Vs calls using function pointers
  • From: "Digvijoy Chatterjee" <chatterjee.digvijoy@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: AMD64 ABI and comparison of structures
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: functions calls Vs calls using function pointers
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• AMD64 ABI and comparison of structures
  • From: José Bollo <jose.bollo@xxxxxxxx>
• use of changes in STL library
  • From: Marek Zuk <marekzuk@xxxxxxxxx>
• functions calls Vs calls using function pointers
  • From: "Digvijoy Chatterjee" <chatterjee.digvijoy@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem passing constants to inline asm
  • From: Stas Sergeev <stsp@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Curious segmentation fault... SOLVED
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Curious segmentation fault... SOLVED
  • From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem passing constants to inline asm
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: C++ auto_ptr template query
  • From: "Digvijoy Chatterjee" <chatterjee.digvijoy@xxxxxxxxx>
• have the experience but no degree, we can help
  • From: tnbothner@xxxxxxxxxxx
• RE: Linking un-referenced function
  • From: Jason Lam <jlam555@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Linking un-referenced function
  • From: "Meissner, Michael" <michael.meissner@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Linking un-referenced function
  • From: Jason Lam <jlam555@xxxxxxxxx>
• Generate listing files
  • From: "Alec, Bill HS" <Bill.Alek@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Curious segmentation fault...
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Relinking GCC as Static?
  • From: "Aaron Davies" <aaron.davies@xxxxxxxxx>
• How can compiled file include preprocessor macro info?
  • From: scl <scl.sang@xxxxxxxxx>
• what should we do next step.
  • From: liqin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• C++ auto_ptr template query
  • From: "Digvijoy Chatterjee" <chatterjee.digvijoy@xxxxxxxxx>
• ARM Inline Assembler and 64 bit variables
  • From: Wolfgang Haidinger <Wolfgang.Haidinger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: weak-attribute over-optimisation with 4.1
  • From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxx>
• Re: Linking un-referenced function
  • From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Linking un-referenced function
  • From: John Carter <john.carter@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Linking un-referenced function
  • From: John Carter <john.carter@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Linking un-referenced function
  • From: Jason Lam <jlam555@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: weak-attribute over-optimisation with 4.1
  • From: Tom Rini <trini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Curious segmentation fault...
  • From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Curious segmentation fault...
  • From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: OpenSource alternative to Purify memory debugger??
  • From: "Ernest L. Williams Jr." <ernesto@xxxxxxxx>
• problem passing constants to inline asm
  • From: Stas Sergeev <stsp@xxxxxxxx>
• [Platform specific] About data segment
  • From: "poletto" <poletto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: OpenSource alternative to Purify memory debugger??
  • From: "Jim Stapleton" <stapleton.41@xxxxxxxxx>
• OpenSource alternative to Purify memory debugger??
  • From: "Ernest L. Williams Jr." <ernesto@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: OSX and gcc
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• MIPS pseudo-instruction expansion
  • From: Amirtharaj J <amiroffline@xxxxxxxxx>
• OSX and gcc
  • From: Gregorio Canelos <gtc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc-3.4.6 config options
  • From: "Bill Cunningham" <billcu1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc-4.0.3 compilation issues on Linux
  • From: "Digvijoy Chatterjee" <chatterjee.digvijoy@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: weak-attribute over-optimisation with 4.1
  • From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with Map Iterator
  • From: "Dima Sorkin" <dima.sorkin@xxxxxxxxx>
• weak-attribute over-optimisation with 4.1
  • From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxx>
• _mm_movpi64_epi64 does not generate MOVQ2DQ
  • From: James Milne <jamesm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Doubt
  • From: Deepak.Kashyap@xxxxxxxxxxx
• makefile issue
  • From: "Parikshat Dubey" <parikshatdubey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: stl set
  • From: Andreas Pfeil <andreas.pfeil@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help Needed for gcc on Linux x86_64
  • From: Greg Davey <gbdavey@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• stl set
  • From: Aseem Rastogi <aseem@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Compiling gcc 4.1 on solaris 2.8 64 bits
  • From: Stéphane Graziani <graziani@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Government Requirements - Proprietary Software
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Government Requirements - Proprietary Software
  • From: "Edward Hua" <Edward.Hua@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: comparison of structures
  • From: "cheng long" <kevinclcn@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: comparison of structures
  • From: Fabian Cenedese <Cenedese@xxxxxxxx>
• comparison of structures
  • From: José Bollo <jose.bollo@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help Needed for gcc on Linux x86_64
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Help needed for building GCC 4.1.0
  • From: kobefan@xxxxxxx
• RE: Help Needed for gcc on Linux x86_64
  • From: "Ashwani Bhat" <ashwanib@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help Needed for gcc on Linux x86_64
  • From: "satyaakam goswami" <satyaakam@xxxxxxxxx>
• Help Needed for gcc on Linux x86_64
  • From: "Ashwani Bhat" <ashwanib@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: open or fopen?
  • From: Ingo Krabbe <ikrabbe.ask@xxxxxx>
• open or fopen?
  • From: "Eric Fisher" <joefoxreal@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Government Requirements - Proprietary Software
  • From: Ingo Krabbe <ikrabbe.ask@xxxxxx>
• RE: Government Requirements - Proprietary Software
  • From: "Edward Hua" <Edward.Hua@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Government Requirements - Proprietary Software
  • From: Richard Stallman <rms@xxxxxxx>
• Compile gcc 4.1.0 hang on perl perl texi2pod.pl -D fastjar
  • From: "Edward Hua" <Edward.Hua@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++-4.0.3: program output is different when compiled with -O3 (did not happen with gcc-3.4.5)
  • From: Erik <freeciv@xxxxxxx>
• Re: g++-4.0.3: program output is different when compiled with -O3 (did not happen with gcc-3.4.5)
  • From: Peter Doerfler <gcc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++-4.0.3: program output is different when compiled with -O3 (did not happen with gcc-3.4.5)
  • From: Peter Doerfler <gcc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Government Requirements - Proprietary Software
  • From: "Peter Rock" <gnuosphere@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++-4.0.3: program output is different when compiled with -O3 (did not happen with gcc-3.4.5)
  • From: Erik <sigra@xxxxxxx>
• Re: g++-4.0.3: program output is different when compiled with -O3 (did not happen with gcc-3.4.5)
  • From: Peter Doerfler <gcc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem with building of libjava
  • From: kobefan@xxxxxxx
• DP Server c++ Makefile FreeBSD
  • From: "Andrew Jones" <mogulbasher@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++-4.0.3: program output is different when compiled with -O3 (did not happen with gcc-3.4.5)
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++-4.0.3: program output is different when compiled with -O3 (did not happen with gcc-3.4.5)
  • From: Erik <freeciv@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Broadcast and Multicast using UDP
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian@xxxxxxxx>
• std::vector does not independently call default constructors
  • From: Steven Scott <steve_the_bayesian@xxxxxxxxx>
• Broadcast and Multicast using UDP
  • From: "Parikshat Dubey" <parikshatdubey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: can we define a comment?
  • From: David Fang <fang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: can we define a comment?
  • From: "Burak Serdar" <bserdar@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: can we define a comment?
  • From: "Eric Fisher" <joefoxreal@xxxxxxxxx>
• can we define a comment?
  • From: "Eric Fisher" <joefoxreal@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem with building of libjava
  • From: kobefan@xxxxxxx
• Re: maximum number of dimensions in C/C++ array
  • From: "Brian Budge" <brian.budge@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem with building of libjava
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• problem with building of libjava
  • From: kobefan@xxxxxxx
• Re: maximum number of dimensions in C/C++ array
  • From: andre maute <andre.maute@xxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with Map Iterator
  • From: Peter Doerfler <gcc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem building cross compiler gcc-3.4.4
  • From: "Shyamal Sadanshio" <shyamal.sadanshio@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with Map Iterator
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with Map Iterator
  • From: Aseem Rastogi <aseem@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with Map Iterator
  • From: Aseem Rastogi <aseem@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with Map Iterator
  • From: "Burak Serdar" <bserdar@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with Map Iterator
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Problem with Map Iterator
  • From: "Sanjib Talukdar" <sanjibt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem building cross compiler gcc-3.4.4
  • From: Kai Ruottu <karuottu@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: maximum number of dimensions in C/C++ array
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++-4.0.3: program output is different when compiled with -O3 (did not happen with gcc-3.4.5)
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• problem building cross compiler gcc-3.4.4
  • From: "Shyamal Sadanshio" <shyamal.sadanshio@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: maximum number of dimensions in C/C++ array
  • From: andre maute <andre.maute@xxxxxx>
• Inline assembly and using of IN and OUT assembler instructions
  • From: majess <majess@xxxxx>
• Fwd: I use g++(gcc) 3.4.2 in win32 platform, and I can't compile my little program....
  • From: "阿保" <auxo86@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: maximum number of dimensions in C/C++ array
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• maximum number of dimensions in C/C++ array
  • From: andre maute <andre.maute@xxxxxx>
• Help request from newbee on JvNewTYPEArray and System.out usage
  • From: mirleau@xxxxxxxxxx
• g++-4.0.3: program output is different when compiled with -O3 (did not happen with gcc-3.4.5)
  • From: Erik <sigra@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Reading material on C++ executable and object file format
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problems compiling gcc-4.1-branch on AMD64
  • From: Kai Ruottu <karuottu@xxxxxxxx>
• Reading material on C++ executable and object file format
  • From: Aseem Rastogi <aseem@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc killed message
  • From: Sven Eschenberg <eschenb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc killed message
  • From: Dimitrios Tsoumakos <dtsouma@xxxxxxxxxx>
• "mygcc/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.0.2/cc1" != "mygcc/gcc/cc1"
  • From: "sean yang" <seanatpurdue@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Makefile Issue
  • From: Perry Smith <pedz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Locales
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Locales
  • From: chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Reg SEGV
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Reg SEGV
  • From: "Vivek Katakam" <vivek1717@xxxxxxxxx>
• Makefile Issue
  • From: "Parikshat Dubey" <parikshatdubey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Ordering functor fails for optimized build with GCC-4.0.3 on athlon64 dual core
  • From: Erik <sigra@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Problems compiling gcc-4.1-branch on AMD64
  • From: Asfand Yar Qazi <email@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• trouble with gcc3.3 on IRIX 6.5.25
  • From: "depaulo ferreira" <depauloferreira@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Reg SEGV
  • From: John Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Reg SEGV
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Reg SEGV
  • From: "Vivek Katakam" <vivek1717@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Fortran frontend prerequisites
  • From: "sean yang" <seanatpurdue@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problems compiling gcc-4.1-branch on AMD64
  • From: Kai Ruottu <karuottu@xxxxxxxx>
• multiple definitions, shared library
  • From: "Roland Leitner" <roland-leitner@xxxxxxxxx>
• Changing from g++ 2.95.3 to g++ 3.x
  • From: "Stuart Brooks" <stuartb@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Build 32 bit compiler on 64 bit machine
  • From: Kai Ruottu <karuottu@xxxxxxxx>
• compatibility between gcc4.0 and gcc4.1
  • From: Thomas Porschberg <thomas.porschberg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Build 32 bit compiler on 64 bit machine
  • From: Darryl Miles <darryl-mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Fortran frontend prerequisites
  • From: "sean yang" <seanatpurdue@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Build 32 bit compiler on 64 bit machine
  • From: Asfand Yar Qazi <email@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: makefile error
  • From: Daniel Llorens del Río <daniel.llorensdelrio@xxxxxxx>
• makefile error
  • From: "Parikshat Dubey" <parikshatdubey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc linking and address of template function
  • From: "Brian Budge" <brian.budge@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc linking and address of template function
  • From: "Brian Gough" <bjg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Build 32 bit compiler on 64 bit machine
  • From: "Christina Wang" <cxwang_wt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• gcj: how to disable 'Discouraged redundant use of...' warning.
  • From: "miko mmm" <miko3l@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Fortran frontend prerequisites
  • From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@xxxxxxxxx>
• Fortran frontend prerequisites
  • From: "sean yang" <seanatpurdue@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Using gcc3.3.3 with mingw32 - help.
  • From: Dave Murphy <wintermute2k4@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Using gcc3.3.3 with mingw32 - help.
  • From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem of template inheritance on g++
  • From: "Digvijoy Chatterjee" <chatterjee.digvijoy@xxxxxxxxx>
• problem of template inheritance on g++
  • From: "amol" <gajewar.amol@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mangling rules
  • From: Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• mangling rules
  • From: Hiroki Kaminaga <kaminaga@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.0 doesn't recognize .cc?
  • From: "Digvijoy Chatterjee" <chatterjee.digvijoy@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Please, help with this scope problem (simple?)
  • From: "Digvijoy Chatterjee" <chatterjee.digvijoy@xxxxxxxxx>
• wchar support :(
  • From: "Brian Budge" <brian.budge@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc-4.0 doesn't recognize .cc?
  • From: tonyr <tonyr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• static non-SSP'ed executable linked with SSP'ed library
  • From: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: SIGSEGV in std::string append
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• SIGSEGV in std::string append
  • From: "Guillaume Fraysse" <gfraysse@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Please, help with this scope problem (simple?)
  • From: Philippe Haution <philippe_haution@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Please, help with this scope problem (simple?)
  • From: "Leon Pollak" <leon.pollak@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Please, help with this scope problem (simple?)
  • From: Blake Huff <stangmechanic@xxxxxxxxx>
• Please, help with this scope problem (simple?)
  • From: "Leon Pollak" <leon.pollak@xxxxxxxxx>
• Using gcc3.3.3 with mingw32 - help.
  • From: cgalvagn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: V/S to GCC/G77 fortran conversion
  • From: TPCgcc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: gcc linking and address of template function
  • From: Perry Smith <pedz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>