Kai Ruottu wrote: > Asfand Yar Qazi kirjoitti: > >> What's going on? >> > You didn't find your eyeglasses and therefore didn't see the "See... for > more > details" suggestion ? "Who else could raise the cat's tail if not the > cat itself". > Whatever went wrong, can be seen in that 'config.log' in the directory > where > the configure failed ! There's nothing of benefit in config.log, especially since I can't find the one this particular command refers to. > > Your "gcc-4.1-branch" as the name for the 'gcc-4.1.x' sources of course > sounds > odd. If these sources were experimental prereleases for something, they > can > be very badly broken sometimes. I would suggest trying the official > releases > first.. > > gcc-4.1-branch is where all the bug-fixes occur for the 4.1 release. It is theoretically more stable than the latest gcc 4.1 official release.
