Martin Quinson writes: > For information, I've solved my issue. A part of my code was doing an > overflow in an array stored on the stack. It looks like %ebx is stored right > after user data, but only reused with dynamic linking and some optimizations > enabled (or so). > > That is why it worked without optimization: I was overwritting a useless > value in that case. > > Hoo-ray! > > I am deeply sorry for this list polution. Thanks for letting us know. FYI, -fstack-protector might have helped. Andrew.
