Re: issue with gcc 4.x optimizations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



For information, I've solved my issue. A part of my code was doing an
overflow in an array stored on the stack. It looks like %ebx is stored right
after user data, but only reused with dynamic linking and some optimizations
enabled (or so).

That is why it worked without optimization: I was overwritting a useless
value in that case.

Hoo-ray!

I am deeply sorry for this list polution.
Martin Quinson.

-- 
Oh, I am a C programmer and I'm okay.
I muck with indices and structs all day.
And when it works, I shout hoo-ray.
Oh, I am a C programmer and I'm okay.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux