RE: Gcc3.2 build error on Solaris 10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Bill,

Thanks for the offer, but we've already confirmed GCC3.2 builds ok on our
Solaris 8/9 systems (we've got a few senior citizens of our own doddering
about the place). It seems Solaris10 has modified it's systems headers
sufficiently to break the GCC3.2.x build, but it would be nice if someone
out there with solaris10 could double check to see if it is really Solaris10
or just our system. 

However, seeing as this release is years behind the current curve, it could
be a wake-up for us to update our compilers, as has already been hinted.
Painful, but perhaps time?

Cheers,

Dan

-----Original Message-----
From: Bill McEnaney [mailto:bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 11:44 AM
To: Dan Keating; 'Ian Lance Taylor'; gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Gcc3.2 build error on Solaris 10

Hey, Folks,

I think my Sunblade 100, which runs Solaris 8, has built Gcc3.2.  So if
anybody wants me to try to build it, I'll be happy to do that.  Sadly, the
poor ol' guy is a slow poke, who probably thinks aslmost as slowly as my
spastic fingers type.  :)  Since Tamino, the workstation, has tured six this
month, he;s a senior citizen.  ;)

Bill

> Thanks for the reply.
> 
> Yes, I am aware what the the error itself is, but I was hoping this
was a known issue, with perhaps a work-around to go with it. Looks like I'm
out of luck on that front.
> 
> The gcc3.3 series does build on solaris10, so a move to another series
might be the way to go. However, when you have a legacy of commercial
products to support, it's not always easy to upgrade to the latest and
greatest :-)
> 
> Best of luck,
> 
> Dan
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gcc-help-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gcc-help-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
> On Behalf Of Ian Lance Taylor
> Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 2:34 AM
> To: Dan Keating
> Cc: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Gcc3.2 build error on Solaris 10
> 
> "Dan Keating" <dan.keating@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > I'm having problems building gcc3.2 on a solaris 10 system. 
> > Gcc2.95.3 builds fine, but 3.2 and 3.2.3 both fall down with the
following error:
> > 
> > /temp/bsm/gcc-sun10/gcc/xgcc -B/temp/bsm/gcc-sun10/gcc/ 
> > -B/lang/gcc/3.2/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/bin/
> > -B/lang/gcc/3.2/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/lib/ -isystem 
> > /lang/gcc/3.2/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
> > -I../../../../gcc-3.2/libstdc++-v3/libmath -I.. -g -O2 -c 
> > ../../../../gcc-3.2/libstdc++-v3/libmath/signbit.c -o signbit.o In 
> > file included from
../../../../gcc-3.2/libstdc++-v3/libmath/signbit.c:32:
> > ../../../../gcc-3.2/libstdc++-v3/libmath/mathconf.h:84: conflicting 
> > types for `nan'
> > /usr/include/iso/math_c99.h:145: previous declaration of `nan'
> > 
> > Configure is being run with parameters "--enable-languages=c++ 
> > --disable-shared".
> > 
> > Hopefully there's someone who can see a cause for this.
> 
> Look at the two files in question:
> 
> gcc-3.2/libstdc++-v3/libmath/mathconf.h, line 84 
> /usr/include/iso/math_c99.h, line 145
> 
> Most likely you will see conflicting types for nan.
> 
> Since gcc 3.2 is four years old and completely unsupported, your best 
> bet for fixing this would be to edit mathconf.h to match your system 
> header file.
> 
> Ian
> 
> 

________________________________________________________________
"Pro-choice?"  Then click here.
http://cathinsight.com/morality/saying.htm

"Men must look for the peace of Christ in the Kingdom of Christ... When once
men recognize, both in private and in public life, that Christ is King,
society will at last receive the great blessings of real liberty,
well-ordered discipline, peace and harmony."  Pope Pius XI


[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux