GCC Help

• Thread Index

• Re: partition function into cold and hot function by using __builtin_expect
  • From: Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: partition function into cold and hot function by using __builtin_expect
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• C++ coroutines and embedded platforms
  • From: "Matwey V. Kornilov via Gcc-help" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Support of link time symbols reorder to improve performance
  • From: Fangrui Song <i@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Support of link time symbols reorder to improve performance
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Support of link time symbols reorder to improve performance
  • From: Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: partition function into cold and hot function by using __builtin_expect
  • From: 陈云星 via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Add custom floating point type in riscv
  • From: David Mallasén Quintana via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Support of link time symbols reorder to improve performance
  • From: 陈云星 via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: partition function into cold and hot function by using __builtin_expect
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• partition function into cold and hot function by using __builtin_expect
  • From: 陈云星 via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-11 C++ Regression on Cygwin
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-11 C++ Regression on Cygwin
  • From: James McKelvey <mckelveyjw@xxxxxxx>
• Is there a macro to get the basename and dirname of __FILE__?
  • From: Peng Yu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to turn any possible optimization during compilation?
  • From: Martin Sebor via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Code Coverage data structure are not populated with latest cross toolchain in embedded devices.
  • From: suneet saini via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to turn any possible optimization during compilation?
  • From: Liu Hao via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• How to turn any possible optimization during compilation?
  • From: Peng Yu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-11 C++ Regression on Cygwin
  • From: Liu Hao via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-11 C++ Regression on Cygwin
  • From: Jonathan Yong via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-11 C++ Regression on Cygwin
  • From: Sam Varshavchik <mrsam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-11 C++ Regression on Cygwin
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-11 C++ Regression on Cygwin
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-11 C++ Regression on Cygwin
  • From: Liu Hao via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-11 C++ Regression on Cygwin
  • From: Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc-11 C++ Regression on Cygwin
  • From: James McKelvey <mckelveyjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: How to just output unoptimized assembly code without any extra annotations?
  • From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Ill-behaved `gcc -E ... | head` exit status?
  • From: Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Ill-behaved `gcc -E ... | head` exit status?
  • From: Peng Yu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• How to just output unoptimized assembly code without any extra annotations?
  • From: Peng Yu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to make gcc aware of arguments in embedded assembly code?
  • From: Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to make gcc aware of arguments in embedded assembly code?
  • From: Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to make gcc aware of arguments in embedded assembly code?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• How to make gcc aware of arguments in embedded assembly code?
  • From: Peng Yu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 7.1.0 Aarch64 for windows
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• GCC 7.1.0 Aarch64 for windows
  • From: "Jayaramaiah, Sindhu Export License Required - US Collins via Gcc-help" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• GDB has problems reading GCC's debugging info level -g3
  • From: "R. Diez via Gcc-help" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What is the difference between Scrt1.o and crt1.o?
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What is the difference between Scrt1.o and crt1.o?
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What is the difference between Scrt1.o and crt1.o?
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ostream operator<< for volatile void *
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What is the difference between Scrt1.o and crt1.o?
  • From: Peng Yu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What is the difference between Scrt1.o and crt1.o?
  • From: Tadeus Prastowo via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What is the difference between Scrt1.o and crt1.o?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What is the difference between Scrt1.o and crt1.o?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What is the difference between Scrt1.o and crt1.o?
  • From: Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What is the difference between Scrt1.o and crt1.o?
  • From: Peng Yu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to check what underlying commands are called by gcc?
  • From: Peng Yu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: disambiguate position-independent code and position-independent executable
  • From: Alexander Shpilkin via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What is the difference between Scrt1.o and crt1.o?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 10.2.0 mtocrf instructions on Freescale P1014 (ppc)
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to check what underlying commands are called by gcc?
  • From: Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What is the difference between Scrt1.o and crt1.o?
  • From: Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: disambiguate position-independent code and position-independent executable
  • From: Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What is the difference between Scrt1.o and crt1.o?
  • From: Peng Yu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What is the difference between Scrt1.o and crt1.o?
  • From: Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to check what underlying commands are called by gcc?
  • From: Peng Yu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What is the difference between Scrt1.o and crt1.o?
  • From: Peng Yu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What is the difference between Scrt1.o and crt1.o?
  • From: Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: disambiguate position-independent code and position-independent executable
  • From: Peng Yu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: disambiguate position-independent code and position-independent executable
  • From: Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What is the difference between Scrt1.o and crt1.o?
  • From: Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• disambiguate position-independent code and position-independent executable
  • From: Peng Yu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• What is the difference between Scrt1.o and crt1.o?
  • From: Peng Yu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: gcc 10.2.0 mtocrf instructions on Freescale P1014 (ppc)
  • From: "Barbier, Renaud via Gcc-help" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to check what underlying commands are called by gcc?
  • From: Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to check what underlying commands are called by gcc?
  • From: Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to lookup the unnamed string constant in the generated object or executable?
  • From: Tadeus Prastowo via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to check what underlying commands are called by gcc?
  • From: Peng Yu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to check what underlying commands are called by gcc?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to check what underlying commands are called by gcc?
  • From: Stefan Ring via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to check what underlying commands are called by gcc?
  • From: Peng Yu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to check what underlying commands are called by gcc?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to check what underlying commands are called by gcc?
  • From: Peng Yu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to check what underlying commands are called by gcc?
  • From: Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to check what underlying commands are called by gcc?
  • From: Liu Hao via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to check what underlying commands are called by gcc?
  • From: Peng Yu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to check what underlying commands are called by gcc?
  • From: Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to check what underlying commands are called by gcc?
  • From: Peng Yu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to check what underlying commands are called by gcc?
  • From: Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to check what underlying commands are called by gcc?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: About -print-prog-name exist status
  • From: Tadeus Prastowo via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to check what underlying commands are called by gcc?
  • From: Tadeus Prastowo via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: About -print-prog-name exist status
  • From: Peng Yu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to check what underlying commands are called by gcc?
  • From: Peng Yu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: About -print-prog-name exist status
  • From: Tadeus Prastowo via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: About -print-prog-name exist status
  • From: Tadeus Prastowo via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to check what underlying commands are called by gcc?
  • From: Tadeus Prastowo via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• About -print-prog-name exist status
  • From: Peng Yu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to check what underlying commands are called by gcc?
  • From: Peng Yu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to lookup the unnamed string constant in the generated object or executable?
  • From: Peng Yu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Security flags
  • From: Martin Sebor via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Linking problems when passing linker flags before files
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Linking problems when passing linker flags before files
  • From: Tadeus Prastowo via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Linking problems when passing linker flags before files
  • From: Jakub Nowak <j.nowak26@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to check what underlying commands are called by gcc?
  • From: Tadeus Prastowo via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• How to check what underlying commands are called by gcc?
  • From: Peng Yu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to lookup the unnamed string constant in the generated object or executable?
  • From: Stefan Ring via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Where can I download gcc info manuals?
  • From: Pankaj Jangid <pankaj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to lookup the unnamed string constant in the generated object or executable?
  • From: Peng Yu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Where can I download gcc info manuals?
  • From: Richard Sandiford via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Where can I download gcc info manuals?
  • From: Martin Sebor via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Where can I download gcc info manuals?
  • From: Pankaj Jangid <pankaj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Where can I download gcc info manuals?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to lookup the unnamed string constant in the generated object or executable?
  • From: Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to lookup the unnamed string constant in the generated object or executable?
  • From: Peng Yu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to lookup the unnamed string constant in the generated object or executable?
  • From: Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to lookup the unnamed string constant in the generated object or executable?
  • From: Stefan Ring via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Where can I download gcc info manuals?
  • From: Pankaj Jangid <pankaj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to lookup the unnamed string constant in the generated object or executable?
  • From: Peng Yu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Attribute packed and alignment
  • From: Richard Earnshaw via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to lookup the unnamed string constant in the generated object or executable?
  • From: Florian Weimer via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why .bss is not of size 0?
  • From: Florian Weimer via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to lookup the unnamed string constant in the generated object or executable?
  • From: Stefan Ring via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to lookup the unnamed string constant in the generated object or executable?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• How to lookup the unnamed string constant in the generated object or executable?
  • From: Peng Yu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Why .bss is not of size 0?
  • From: Peng Yu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Attribute packed and alignment
  • From: Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Removing unused code/variables
  • From: David Sherman <DSherman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Removing unused code/variables
  • From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Removing unused code/variables
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Removing unused code/variables
  • From: David Sherman <DSherman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Attribute packed and alignment
  • From: Richard Earnshaw via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: object file symbol table generated by gcc
  • From: Alexander Monakov via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• object file symbol table generated by gcc
  • From: Peng Yu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Attribute packed and alignment
  • From: Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Removing unused code/variables
  • From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Removing unused code/variables
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Limits on constant folding
  • From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Removing unused code/variables
  • From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Attribute packed and alignment
  • From: "Matwey V. Kornilov via Gcc-help" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Limits on constant folding
  • From: NightStrike via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Removing unused code/variables
  • From: Alexander Shpilkin via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Help]: automation suite in c++
  • From: NightStrike via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• [Help]: automation suite in c++
  • From: David Caul via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 10.2.0 mtocrf instructions on Freescale P1014 (ppc)
  • From: Peter Bergner via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Removing unused code/variables
  • From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Removing unused code/variables
  • From: David Sherman <DSherman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ostream operator<< for volatile void *
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: ostream operator<< for volatile void *
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ostream operator<< for volatile void *
  • From: NightStrike via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ostream operator<< for volatile void *
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Security flags
  • From: Eddy Nakamura via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• ostream operator<< for volatile void *
  • From: NightStrike via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: A priori profile optimization
  • From: NightStrike via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: syntax of asm
  • From: Hongtao Liu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• syntax of asm
  • From: Peng Yu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Patch for gcc-10.3.0
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Patch for gcc-10.3.0
  • From: Jim Wilson <jimw@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Patch for gcc-10.3.0
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Patch for gcc-10.3.0
  • From: Jim Wilson <jimw@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
  • From: Klaus Rudolph via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
  • From: Klaus Rudolph via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
  • From: Anton Staaf <anton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
  • From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Patch for gcc-10.3.0
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
  • From: Klaus Rudolph via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is there a way to distinguish binary files compiled with -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=1 and -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
  • From: Jeff Law via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
  • From: Matthijs Kooijman <matthijs@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
  • From: Klaus Rudolph via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Patch for gcc-10.3.0
  • From: John Hendry <jj_hendry@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
  • From: "Peter Sommerlad \(C++\) via Gcc-help" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: bit-fields integral promotion issues
  • From: Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: bit-fields integral promotion issues
  • From: Liu Hao via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• bit-fields integral promotion issues
  • From: He Leon via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
  • From: Trampas Stern <tstern@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
  • From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
  • From: Klaus via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
  • From: Trampas Stern <tstern@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Header file error while using cc1plus
  • From: Saloni Garg via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
  • From: Klaus Rudolph via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Stack Overflow Question
  • From: johnsfine--- via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Stack Overflow Question
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Stack Overflow Question
  • From: Ming Cheng via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• peep2_attempt should transfer reg dead notes
  • From: "Stefan Franke" <stefan@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: march=native fails with newer hardware
  • From: Jim Wilson <jimw@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: march=native fails with newer hardware
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• march=native fails with newer hardware
  • From: Jonathan Brandmeyer <jbrandmeyer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 10.2.0 mtocrf instructions on Freescale P1014 (ppc)
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: For Contributing into gcc website or gcc-cvs-wwwdocs
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: For Contributing into gcc website or gcc-cvs-wwwdocs
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-cvs-wwwdocs or For Contributing into gcc website.
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: gcc 10.2.0 mtocrf instructions on Freescale P1014 (ppc)
  • From: "Barbier, Renaud via Gcc-help" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about the coverage statistics of Gcov
  • From: heng zhang via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc-cvs-wwwdocs or For Contributing into gcc website.
  • From: Veerpal Kaur via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• For Contributing into gcc website or gcc-cvs-wwwdocs
  • From: Manish Samota via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 10.2.0 mtocrf instructions on Freescale P1014 (ppc)
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 10.2.0 mtocrf instructions on Freescale P1014 (ppc)
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is there a way to distinguish binary files compiled with -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=1 and -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
  • From: Martin Sebor via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 10.2.0 mtocrf instructions on Freescale P1014 (ppc)
  • From: Henri Cloetens <henri.cloetens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: gcc 10.2.0 mtocrf instructions on Freescale P1014 (ppc)
  • From: "Barbier, Renaud via Gcc-help" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 10.2.0 mtocrf instructions on Freescale P1014 (ppc)
  • From: Henri Cloetens <henri.cloetens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc 10.2.0 mtocrf instructions on Freescale P1014 (ppc)
  • From: "Barbier, Renaud via Gcc-help" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Is there a way to distinguish binary files compiled with -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=1 and -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
  • From: Peng Yu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Add custom instructions in riscv
  • From: Jim Wilson <jimw@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about the coverage statistics of Gcov
  • From: Jim Wilson <jimw@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Header file error while using cc1plus
  • From: Peter Bergner via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Add custom instructions in riscv
  • From: Ορφέας Περδικούρης <el15081@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about the coverage statistics of Gcov
  • From: heng zhang via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Fast multipliers on ARM
  • From: Richard Earnshaw via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Header file error while using cc1plus
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Header file error while using cc1plus
  • From: Saloni Garg via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Header file error while using cc1plus
  • From: Stefan Ring via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Header file error while using cc1plus
  • From: Saloni Garg via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: help with -finstrument-functions
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: help with -finstrument-functions
  • From: Thomas Bleher via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• help with -finstrument-functions
  • From: Akshit Sharma via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about the coverage statistics of Gcov
  • From: Jim Wilson <jimw@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Need suggestion for using intypes.h features in centos5 gcc 4.1.2 compiler version.
  • From: Jim Wilson <jimw@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Fast multipliers on ARM
  • From: Michael Robins via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Question about the coverage statistics of Gcov
  • From: heng zhang via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Need suggestion for using right gcc 8.2 warning flag
  • From: "Kannuswamy, Nanthakumar via Gcc-help" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Need suggestion for using right gcc 8.2 warning flag
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Need suggestion for using right gcc 8.2 warning flag
  • From: "Kannuswamy, Nanthakumar via Gcc-help" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Need suggestion for using intypes.h features in centos5 gcc 4.1.2 compiler version.
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Need suggestion for using intypes.h features in centos5 gcc 4.1.2 compiler version.
  • From: "Kannuswamy, Nanthakumar via Gcc-help" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: An error due to installation that require binutils package
  • From: John Simpson via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: libstdc++ doxygen build error
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: libstdc++ doxygen build error
  • From: SAIFI <saifi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gfortran | 9.3.1 missing FINDLOC?
  • From: Evan Cooch via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gfortran | 9.3.1 missing FINDLOC?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gfortran | 9.3.1 missing FINDLOC?
  • From: Evan Cooch via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gfortran | 9.3.1 missing FINDLOC?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gfortran | 9.3.1 missing FINDLOC?
  • From: Evan Cooch via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gfortran | 9.3.1 missing FINDLOC?
  • From: Jim Wilson <jimw@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: libstdc++ doxygen build error
  • From: SAIFI <saifi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: doxygen GCC_ASSISTED_PARSING option
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• doxygen GCC_ASSISTED_PARSING option
  • From: SAIFI <saifi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: An error due to installation that require binutils package
  • From: Stefano Garzarella via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: libstdc++ doxygen build error
  • From: SAIFI <saifi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: An error due to installation that require binutils package
  • From: Peter Maydell via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: An error due to installation that require binutils package
  • From: John Simpson via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is there a way to print what -Wall represents?
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Re: gcc compiler options according to visual studio warning level /W3
  • From: Paul Smith via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: An error due to installation that require binutils package
  • From: George Dunlap via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Re: gcc compiler options according to visual studio warning level /W3
  • From: Markus Forrer via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc compiler options according to visual studio warning level /W3
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc compiler options according to visual studio warning level /W3
  • From: Markus Forrer via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: libstdc++ doxygen build error
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is there a way to print what -Wall represents?
  • From: Peng Yu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• gfortran | 9.3.1 missing FINDLOC?
  • From: Evan Cooch via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is there a way to print what -Wall represents?
  • From: Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Is there a way to print what -Wall represents?
  • From: Peng Yu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• libstdc++ doxygen build error
  • From: SAIFI <saifi@xxxxxxxxx>
• An error due to installation that require binutils package
  • From: John Simpson via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• AW: AW: setmemsi, movmemsi and post_inc
  • From: "Stefan Franke" <stefan@xxxxxxxxx>
• AW: setmemsi, movmemsi and post_inc
  • From: "Stefan Franke" <stefan@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: setmemsi, movmemsi and post_inc
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: setmemsi, movmemsi and post_inc
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: setmemsi, movmemsi and post_inc
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• AW: AW: AW: AW: setmemsi, movmemsi and post_inc
  • From: "Stefan Franke" <stefan@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: AW: AW: AW: setmemsi, movmemsi and post_inc
  • From: Jeff Law via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Confused about -Wabi with type tag on virtual method
  • From: John Steele Scott <toojays@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• AW: AW: AW: setmemsi, movmemsi and post_inc
  • From: "Stefan Franke" <stefan@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: space after dot . member access operator
  • From: SAIFI <saifi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: AW: AW: setmemsi, movmemsi and post_inc
  • From: Jeff Law via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• AW: AW: setmemsi, movmemsi and post_inc
  • From: "Stefan Franke" <stefan@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: setmemsi, movmemsi and post_inc
  • From: Jeff Law via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• setmemsi, movmemsi and post_inc
  • From: "Stefan Franke" <stefan@xxxxxxxxx>
• Can help with task of language frontend cleanup
  • From: "pawel k. via Gcc-help" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• mips-elf (10.2.0) - Question about floating point constants
  • From: Yt Dl via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Gcj-Add Phone lines/Upgrade plan?
  • From: Sebastian Smith via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++: Suboptimal code generation for simple wrapper class around vector data type
  • From: Martin Reinecke <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++: Suboptimal code generation for simple wrapper class around vector data type
  • From: Alexander Monakov via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: space after dot . member access operator
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++: Suboptimal code generation for simple wrapper class around vector data type
  • From: Martin Reinecke <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: space after dot . member access operator
  • From: Andrew Haley via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Telling gcc to assume a register value
  • From: Andrew Haley via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• space after dot . member access operator
  • From: SAIFI <saifi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Telling gcc to assume a register value
  • From: Rena via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• .cppm
  • From: Patrick Kox via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++: Suboptimal code generation for simple wrapper class around vector data type
  • From: Martin Reinecke <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• g++: Suboptimal code generation for simple wrapper class around vector data type
  • From: Martin Reinecke <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Exception not caught with gcc-8.2.0
  • From: Prasath P via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• How to use the plugin "function_reordering_plugin" of function sorting correctly?
  • From: ijinma via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Floating point differences between GCC-7 and GCC-9?
  • From: Alexander Monakov via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Floating point differences between GCC-7 and GCC-9?
  • From: Florian Weimer via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Floating point differences between GCC-7 and GCC-9?
  • From: David Aldrich via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: GCC10 in sysroot: libstdc++ symbols
  • From: Oleg Smolsky via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Floating point calculation differences with AVX instructions
  • From: David Aldrich <David.Aldrich@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Floating point calculation differences with AVX instructions
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Floating point calculation differences with AVX instructions
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Floating point calculation differences with AVX instructions
  • From: David Aldrich via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Telling the C optimizer that a pointer's contents won't be modified
  • From: Martin Sebor via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Telling the C optimizer that a pointer's contents won't be modified
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: GCC10 in sysroot: libstdc++ symbols
  • From: Oleg Smolsky via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Telling the C optimizer that a pointer's contents won't be modified
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC10 in sysroot: libstdc++ symbols
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Telling the C optimizer that a pointer's contents won't be modified
  • From: Hugo Musso Gualandi <hgualandi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC10 in sysroot: libstdc++ symbols
  • From: Florian Weimer via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• GCC10 in sysroot: libstdc++ symbols
  • From: Oleg Smolsky via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Telling the C optimizer that a pointer's contents won't be modified
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Telling the C optimizer that a pointer's contents won't be modified
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Telling the C optimizer that a pointer's contents won't be modified
  • From: Hugo Musso Gualandi <hgualandi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc10 against glibc+sysroot
  • From: Stefan Ring via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: requires unsupported dynamic reloc 11, recompile with -fPIC
  • From: Stefan Ring via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc10 against glibc+sysroot
  • From: Oleg Smolsky via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Interesting regression in parameter passing (x86_64)
  • From: Stefan Ring via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Questions and help
  • From: Florian Weimer via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Questions and help
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Questions and help
  • From: "Dallman, John via Gcc-help" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Questions and help
  • From: Hedi BASBAS via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Building gcc10 against glibc+sysroot
  • From: Oleg Smolsky via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about -Wstrict-overflow=2
  • From: Andrew Haley via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about -Wstrict-overflow=2
  • From: Alexander Motzkau via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about -Wstrict-overflow=2
  • From: Martin Sebor via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about -Wstrict-overflow=2
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Dust Collection article for gcc.gnu.org
  • From: Johannes Bauer via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Dust Collection article for gcc.gnu.org
  • From: John Hamlin <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about -Wstrict-overflow=2
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about -Wstrict-overflow=2
  • From: Andrew Haley via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about -Wstrict-overflow=2
  • From: Alexander Motzkau via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about -Wstrict-overflow=2
  • From: Andrew Haley via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about -Wstrict-overflow=2
  • From: Alexander Motzkau via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about -Wstrict-overflow=2
  • From: Andrew Haley via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Question about -Wstrict-overflow=2
  • From: Alexander Motzkau via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about selectors in the Objective-C ABI
  • From: Evan Bowman via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about selectors in the Objective-C ABI
  • From: Evan Bowman via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Question about selectors in the Objective-C ABI
  • From: Evan Bowman via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: float128 support
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• float128 support
  • From: David D via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Mingw Gcc Windows 7 Reboot
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Mingw Gcc Windows 7 Reboot
  • From: Henri Cloetens <henri.cloetens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Mingw Gcc Windows 7 Reboot
  • From: aspdqqprgcgp--- via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Mingw Gcc Windows 7 Reboot
  • From: Thomas Dineen via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: G++ driver missing option when sending to collect2
  • From: Yeting Kuo via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• ternary operator invalidates __builtin_expect
  • From: Liu Hao via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Reading POD data directly from mmapped memory in C++
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Reading POD data directly from mmapped memory in C++
  • From: Thomas Bleher via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Compiler flags responsible for Alias analysis and CSE
  • From: Shubham Goel via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: G++ driver missing option when sending to collect2
  • From: Jim Wilson <jimw@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why does -g force .cfi_* directives?
  • From: Fangrui Song <i@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: G++ driver missing option when sending to collect2
  • From: Yeting Kuo via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Changing signed time_t (MAX 03:14:07 on Tuesday, 19 January 2038) to an unsigned 32-bit integer (MAX, 06:28:15 on Sunday, 7 February 2106)
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Changing signed time_t (MAX 03:14:07 on Tuesday, 19 January 2038) to an unsigned 32-bit integer (MAX, 06:28:15 on Sunday, 7 February 2106)
  • From: "Steger, Matthew" <matthew.steger@xxxxxxx>
• Re: G++ driver missing option when sending to collect2
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• G++ driver missing option when sending to collect2
  • From: Yeting Kuo via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is there a way to just get the compiler binaries?..
  • From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is there a way to just get the compiler binaries?..
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Is there a way to just get the compiler binaries?..
  • From: Alex K via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables && .cfi_* in inline asm
  • From: Jim Wilson <jimw@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why does -g force .cfi_* directives?
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to successfully use autoLIPO on GCC？
  • From: Xinliang David Li via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to successfully use autoLIPO on GCC？
  • From: Teresa Johnson via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables && .cfi_* in inline asm
  • From: Fangrui Song <i@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why does -g force .cfi_* directives?
  • From: Jim Wilson <jimw@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [google/autofdo] how to use this tools for autoLIPO（autoFDO + LIPO）in gcc google 4_9 branch ? (#106)
  • From: ijinma via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why does -g force .cfi_* directives?
  • From: Fangrui Song <i@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why does -g force .cfi_* directives?
  • From: Fangrui Song <i@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why does -g force .cfi_* directives?
  • From: Jim Wilson <jimw@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Why does -g force .cfi_* directives?
  • From: Fangrui Song <i@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building GCC on arm macOS
  • From: Roman Bolshakov via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building GCC on arm macOS
  • From: Iain Sandoe <iain@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building GCC on arm macOS
  • From: Roman Bolshakov via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building GCC on arm macOS
  • From: Iain Sandoe <iain@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Building GCC on arm macOS
  • From: Roman Bolshakov via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Overriding visibility of template instances
  • From: Sam Varshavchik <mrsam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Interesting regression in parameter passing (x86_64)
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Interesting regression in parameter passing (x86_64)
  • From: Stefan Ring via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: requires unsupported dynamic reloc 11, recompile with -fPIC
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• requires unsupported dynamic reloc 11, recompile with -fPIC
  • From: Harsh Rathod via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• How to package cross compilers?
  • From: Christer Solskogen via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Customizing optimization for debug builds
  • From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Issue with frame pointer elimination
  • From: Henri Cloetens <henri.cloetens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Customizing optimization for debug builds
  • From: mark_at_yahoo via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Issue with frame pointer elimination
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Customizing optimization for debug builds
  • From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Customizing optimization for debug builds
  • From: mark_at_yahoo via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• AW: Issue with frame pointer elimination
  • From: "Stefan Franke" <s.franke@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Issue with frame pointer elimination
  • From: Henri Cloetens <henri.cloetens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• CSE and DCE of not-quite-gnu::const functions
  • From: Alexander Shpilkin via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: libstdc++ version
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• libstdc++ version
  • From: "Kacvinsky, Tom via Gcc-help" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Anyone else has looked for the stack usage report and not found them when using -flto ?
  • From: Visda Vokhshoori via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C++14
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• C++14
  • From: Nima Gougol via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 6.3.0 build fails on Ubuntu 20.04: make: *** [Makefile:924: all] Error 2 - libitm / libquadmath
  • From: lordmund via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 6.3.0 build fails on Ubuntu 20.04: make: *** [Makefile:924: all] Error 2 - libitm / libquadmath
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 6.3.0 build fails on Ubuntu 20.04: make: *** [Makefile:924: all] Error 2 - libitm / libquadmath
  • From: lordmund via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 6.3.0 build fails on Ubuntu 20.04: make: *** [Makefile:924: all] Error 2 - libitm / libquadmath
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 6.3.0 build fails on Ubuntu 20.04: make: *** [Makefile:924: all] Error 2 - libitm / libquadmath
  • From: lordmund via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 6.3.0 build fails on Ubuntu 20.04: make: *** [Makefile:924: all] Error 2 - libitm / libquadmath
  • From: lordmund via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to properly link libgcc in -ffreestanding mode?
  • From: Josef Wolf <jw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to properly link libgcc in -ffreestanding mode?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to properly link libgcc in -ffreestanding mode?
  • From: Alexander Monakov via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• How to properly link libgcc in -ffreestanding mode?
  • From: Josef Wolf <jw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 6.3.0 build fails on Ubuntu 20.04: make: *** [Makefile:924: all] Error 2 - libitm / libquadmath
  • From: Paul Smith via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• GCC 6.3.0 build fails on Ubuntu 20.04: make: *** [Makefile:924: all] Error 2 - libitm / libquadmath
  • From: lordmund--- via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Address sanitizer does not detect obvious leak
  • From: aspdqqprgcgp--- via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is there a stand alone gcc man page repo?
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is there a stand alone gcc man page repo?
  • From: Peng Yu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is there a stand alone gcc man page repo?
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is there a stand alone gcc man page repo?
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Is there a stand alone gcc man page repo?
  • From: Peng Yu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: question_ g++
  • From: Ксения Рощина <m1@xxxxxxx>
• Re: In GCC 10.2, -O2 optimization enables more than docs suggest
  • From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: In GCC 10.2, -O2 optimization enables more than docs suggest
  • From: mark_at_yahoo via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• [regex]crash maybe because of using regex under gcc 5.4
  • From: xian li via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Target triplet: sh-elf vs sh1-elf vs sh2-elf
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Target triplet: sh-elf vs sh1-elf vs sh2-elf
  • From: John Scott via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: In GCC 10.2, -O2 optimization enables more than docs suggest
  • From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: In GCC 10.2, -O2 optimization enables more than docs suggest
  • From: mark_at_yahoo via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: In GCC 10.2, -O2 optimization enables more than docs suggest
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: make check fail on package-unused version-unused
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: In GCC 10.2, -O2 optimization enables more than docs suggest
  • From: mark_at_yahoo via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: In GCC 10.2, -O2 optimization enables more than docs suggest
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• [no subject]
  • From: jass manak FaN via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: In GCC 10.2, -O2 optimization enables more than docs suggest
  • From: mark_at_yahoo via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: In GCC 10.2, -O2 optimization enables more than docs suggest
  • From: Richard Earnshaw via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: question_ g++
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• question_ g++
  • From: Ксения Рощина <m1@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Should GCC provide __builtin_memcpy_inline like clang does?
  • From: "H.J. Lu via Gcc-help" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Should GCC provide __builtin_memcpy_inline like clang does?
  • From: Gabriel Ravier via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Should GCC provide __builtin_memcpy_inline like clang does?
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Should GCC provide __builtin_memcpy_inline like clang does?
  • From: unlvsur unlvsur via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Function multi versioning in libstdc++
  • From: "Kacvinsky, Tom via Gcc-help" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: can I compile stdc++ library alone using existing aarch64 toolchain?
  • From: xian li via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Issue with optimization -funroll-loops
  • From: Henri Cloetens <henri.cloetens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• In GCC 10.2, -O2 optimization enables more than docs suggest
  • From: Brent Roman <brent@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help diagnosing a GCC 10.2 problem : error: 'removed_return.213' may be used uninitialized in this function
  • From: Nick Savoiu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help diagnosing a GCC 10.2 problem : error: 'removed_return.213' may be used uninitialized in this function
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Networking TS completeness
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Networking TS completeness
  • From: "Alessio G. B. via Gcc-help" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: m68k: Simple loop compiles into boundless recursion with -O2
  • From: Fredrik Noring <noring@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: m68k: Simple loop compiles into boundless recursion with -O2
  • From: Liu Hao via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help diagnosing a GCC 10.2 problem : error: 'removed_return.213' may be used uninitialized in this function
  • From: Nick Savoiu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• AW: AW: m68k: Simple loop compiles into boundless recursion with -O2
  • From: "Stefan Franke" <s.franke@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: AW: m68k: Simple loop compiles into boundless recursion with -O2
  • From: Alexander Monakov via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• AW: m68k: Simple loop compiles into boundless recursion with -O2
  • From: "Stefan Franke" <s.franke@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: m68k: Simple loop compiles into boundless recursion with -O2
  • From: Alexander Monakov via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: m68k: Simple loop compiles into boundless recursion with -O2
  • From: Alexander Monakov via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: m68k: Simple loop compiles into boundless recursion with -O2
  • From: Fredrik Noring <noring@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Is there any easy way to check my machine description?
  • From: Xing GUO via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• AW: m68k: Simple loop compiles into boundless recursion with -O2
  • From: "Stefan Franke" <s.franke@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: m68k: Simple loop compiles into boundless recursion with -O2
  • From: Fredrik Noring <noring@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: m68k: Simple loop compiles into boundless recursion with -O2
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: m68k: Simple loop compiles into boundless recursion with -O2
  • From: Alexander Monakov via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: m68k: Simple loop compiles into boundless recursion with -O2
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• AW: m68k: Simple loop compiles into boundless recursion with -O2
  • From: "Stefan Franke" <s.franke@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: m68k: Simple loop compiles into boundless recursion with -O2
  • From: Fredrik Noring <noring@xxxxxxxxxx>
• m68k: Simple loop compiles into boundless recursion with -O2
  • From: Fredrik Noring <noring@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: m68k: Simple loop compiles into boundless recursion with -O2
  • From: Fredrik Noring <noring@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help diagnosing a GCC 10.2 problem : error: 'removed_return.213' may be used uninitialized in this function
  • From: Nick Savoiu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC Compiling issues with cross compiler
  • From: Stefan Ring via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Azure and AWS Users Data Set
  • From: Diana Markle via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Failure to optimize?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• GCC Compiling issues with cross compiler
  • From: "Yerabolu, Spoorthy Priya via Gcc-help" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Failure to optimize?
  • From: Liu Hao via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Failure to optimize?
  • From: Florian Weimer via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Failure to optimize?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Failure to optimize?
  • From: Florian Weimer via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Failure to optimize?
  • From: Alexander Monakov via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Failure to optimize?
  • From: ☂Josh Chia (謝任中) via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Failure to optimize?
  • From: Florian Weimer via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Failure to optimize?
  • From: ☂Josh Chia (謝任中) via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Azure and AWS Users Data Set
  • From: Diana Markle via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Remove name
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: can I compile stdc++ library alone using existing aarch64 toolchain?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: can I compile stdc++ library alone using existing aarch64 toolchain?
  • From: xian li via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: can I compile stdc++ library alone using existing aarch64 toolchain?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• can I compile stdc++ library alone using existing aarch64 toolchain?
  • From: xian li via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Possible bug in gcc-10.2 with non-type template parameter
  • From: Edward Diener <eldlistmailingz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Possible bug in gcc-10.2 with non-type template parameter
  • From: Stefan Ring via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help diagnosing a GCC 10.2 problem : error: 'removed_return.213' may be used uninitialized in this function
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help diagnosing a GCC 10.2 problem : error: 'removed_return.213' may be used uninitialized in this function
  • From: Nick Savoiu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help diagnosing a GCC 10.2 problem : error: 'removed_return.213' may be used uninitialized in this function
  • From: Martin Sebor via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• make check fail on package-unused version-unused
  • From: pillule via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Help diagnosing a GCC 10.2 problem : error: 'removed_return.213' may be used uninitialized in this function
  • From: Nick Savoiu via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Questions on -Wtype-limits
  • From: "Kewen.Lin via Gcc-help" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to get addresses of all code regions in binary?
  • From: Jim Wilson <jimw@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [OpenMP] 40% slow down when setting OMP_PLACES="sockets"
  • From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [OpenMP] 40% slow down when setting OMP_PLACES="sockets"
  • From: nu quaquaraqua via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• [OpenMP] 40% slow down when setting OMP_PLACES="sockets"
  • From: nu quaquaraqua via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Possible bug in gcc-10.2 with non-type template parameter
  • From: Edward Diener <eldlistmailingz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question: C Standad/GCC Extension for How To Assign Binary Number to Unsigned
  • From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Question: C Standad/GCC Extension for How To Assign Binary Number to Unsigned
  • From: "John L. Males via Gcc-help" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Questions on -Wtype-limits
  • From: William Roberts via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be bool type(std::string_view s) { return type(s.data(), s.length()); }
  • From: Hongyi Zhao via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be bool type(std::string_view s) { return type(s.data(), s.length()); }
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• error: void value not ignored as it ought to be bool type(std::string_view s) { return type(s.data(), s.length()); }
  • From: Hongyi Zhao via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• How to get addresses of all code regions in binary?
  • From: Kazi Alom <alomk@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: GCC address sanitizer - supported architecture
  • From: Qingnan Duan via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC address sanitizer - supported architecture
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC address sanitizer - supported architecture
  • From: "Kewen.Lin via Gcc-help" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC address sanitizer - supported architecture
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC address sanitizer - supported architecture
  • From: "Kewen.Lin via Gcc-help" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• GCC address sanitizer - supported architecture
  • From: Qingnan Duan via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building Standard Library Header units
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Building Standard Library Header units
  • From: Patrick Kox <patrick.kox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: transform-reduce compiling with seq but not par - bug?
  • From: Kai via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: transform-reduce compiling with seq but not par - bug?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: transform-reduce compiling with seq but not par - bug?
  • From: Kai via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: transform-reduce compiling with seq but not par - bug?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• transform-reduce compiling with seq but not par - bug?
  • From: Kai via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [GCC 8,2] Aarch64-none-eabi UCVTF problem
  • From: Richard Earnshaw via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• [GCC 8,2] Aarch64-none-eabi UCVTF problem
  • From: Mihailo Stojanovic via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: L1/L2 cache characteristics and -mtune=znver2 versus run-time detection
  • From: "Sven C. Dack via Gcc-help" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: L1/L2 cache characteristics and -mtune=znver2 versus run-time detection
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: L1/L2 cache characteristics and -mtune=znver2 versus run-time detection
  • From: "Sven C. Dack via Gcc-help" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GFORTRAN COMPILER ON IMAC-PRO WITH Big Sur
  • From: "Kewen.Lin via Gcc-help" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• GFORTRAN COMPILER ON IMAC-PRO WITH Big Sur
  • From: Laurence Wagner via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Can 64 bit GCC compiler use LLP64 data model?
  • From: "Grant, Steve via Gcc-help" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Can 64 bit GCC compiler use LLP64 data model?
  • From: "Grant, Steve via Gcc-help" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can 64 bit GCC compiler use LLP64 data model?
  • From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can 64 bit GCC compiler use LLP64 data model?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Can 64 bit GCC compiler use LLP64 data model?
  • From: "Grant, Steve via Gcc-help" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why does GCC drop "+simd" for the assembler if compiling for Armv8-A or Armv8-R?
  • From: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why does GCC drop "+simd" for the assembler if compiling for Armv8-A or Armv8-R?
  • From: Richard Earnshaw via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is this a missed optimization for popcount implementation?
  • From: andre maute <andre.maute@xxxxxx>
• Re: AW: AW: Correct way to express to the compiler "this does not get clobbered"?
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is this a missed optimization for popcount implementation?
  • From: Jim Wilson <jimw@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Builiding not optimized Libgcc for ARM Cortex-M4 target
  • From: Richard Earnshaw via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• AW: AW: AW: Correct way to express to the compiler "this does not get clobbered"?
  • From: "Stefan Franke" <s.franke@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: AW: Correct way to express to the compiler "this does not get clobbered"?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Installing GNU gcc source on Windows 10
  • From: Jonathan Yong via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Installing GNU gcc source on Windows 10
  • From: NightStrike via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is this a missed optimization for popcount implementation?
  • From: andre maute <andre.maute@xxxxxx>
• Re: AW: Correct way to express to the compiler "this does not get clobbered"?
  • From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: AW: AW: Correct way to express to the compiler "this does not get clobbered"?
  • From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is this a missed optimization for popcount implementation?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: AW: AW: Correct way to express to the compiler "this does not get clobbered"?
  • From: Andrea Corallo via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• L1/L2 cache characteristics and -mtune=znver2 versus run-time detection
  • From: "Sven C. Dack" <sdack@xxxxxxx>
• Re: AW: Correct way to express to the compiler "this does not get clobbered"?
  • From: Andrea Corallo via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Is this a missed optimization for popcount implementation?
  • From: andre maute <andre.maute@xxxxxx>
• Re: Question regarding __sync
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Question regarding __sync
  • From: Björn Max Jakobsen via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• AW: AW: Correct way to express to the compiler "this does not get clobbered"?
  • From: "Stefan Franke" <s.franke@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: AW: Correct way to express to the compiler "this does not get clobbered"?
  • From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Correct way to express to the compiler "this does not get clobbered"?
  • From: Liu Hao via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: AW: Correct way to express to the compiler "this does not get clobbered"?
  • From: Andrea Corallo via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• AW: Correct way to express to the compiler "this does not get clobbered"?
  • From: "Stefan Franke" <s.franke@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Correct way to express to the compiler "this does not get clobbered"?
  • From: Andrea Corallo via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Correct way to express to the compiler "this does not get clobbered"?
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Correct way to express to the compiler "this does not get clobbered"?
  • From: Andrea Corallo via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Correct way to express to the compiler "this does not get clobbered"?
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Suggestions for improving efficiency
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Suggestions for improving efficiency
  • From: Emile Michel Hobo via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Correct way to express to the compiler "this does not get clobbered"?
  • From: Andrea Corallo via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Correct way to express to the compiler "this does not get clobbered"?
  • From: Andrea Corallo via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Correct way to express to the compiler "this does not get clobbered"?
  • From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why does GCC drop "+simd" for the assembler if compiling for Armv8-A or Armv8-R?
  • From: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Correct way to express to the compiler "this does not get clobbered"?
  • From: stefan@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Correct way to express to the compiler "this does not get clobbered"?
  • From: Andrea Corallo via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Builiding not optimized Libgcc for ARM Cortex-M4 target
  • From: Enrico Tabanelli via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Correct way to express to the compiler "this does not get clobbered"?
  • From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why does GCC drop "+simd" for the assembler if compiling for Armv8-A or Armv8-R?
  • From: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Correct way to express to the compiler "this does not get clobbered"?
  • From: Andrea Corallo via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Correct way to express to the compiler "this does not get clobbered"?
  • From: Richard Earnshaw via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why does GCC drop "+simd" for the assembler if compiling for Armv8-A or Armv8-R?
  • From: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Correct way to express to the compiler "this does not get clobbered"?
  • From: Andrea Corallo via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Why does GCC drop "+simd" for the assembler if compiling for Armv8-A or Armv8-R?
  • From: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Correct way to express to the compiler "this does not get clobbered"?
  • From: Richard Earnshaw via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Builiding not optimized Libgcc for ARM Cortex-M4 target
  • From: Richard Earnshaw via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Correct way to express to the compiler "this does not get clobbered"?
  • From: Andrea Corallo via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Installing GNU gcc source on Windows 10
  • From: Pierre Gaumond via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Query about how to install specific gcc trunk
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Query about how to install specific gcc trunk
  • From: Stefan Ring via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Query about how to install specific gcc trunk
  • From: upcwanghaibo via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Strange expl results
  • From: Alex Markin via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Strange expl results
  • From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Strange expl results
  • From: Alex Markin via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Strange expl results
  • From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Strange expl results
  • From: Alex Markin via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• How to properly use --with-sysroot in canadian cross?
  • From: Miro Kropáček via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• always_inline and LTO
  • From: Al K via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Macros active in error messages
  • From: emre brookes <brookes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Macros active in error messages
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Macros active in error messages
  • From: emre brookes <brookes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Strange expl results
  • From: Stefan Ring via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Strange expl results
  • From: Stefan Ring via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Strange expl results
  • From: Alex Markin via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Strange expl results
  • From: Stefan Ring via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Strange expl results
  • From: Alex Markin via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Advice on communication regarding mingw cross build problems
  • From: NightStrike via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Anonymous namespaces and global vs.local symbols in nm output
  • From: "Kacvinsky, Tom via Gcc-help" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Macros active in error messages
  • From: emre brookes <brookes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Macros active in error messages
  • From: emre brookes <brookes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Macros active in error messages
  • From: Florian Weimer via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Macros active in error messages
  • From: Martin Sebor via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Builiding not optimized Libgcc for ARM Cortex-M4 target
  • From: Enrico Tabanelli via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Anonymous namespaces and global vs.local symbols in nm output
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Anonymous namespaces and global vs.local symbols in nm output
  • From: Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Anonymous namespaces and global vs.local symbols in nm output
  • From: "Kacvinsky, Tom via Gcc-help" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to see macros active in error messages
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Stack Overflow Question
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• How to see macros active in error messages
  • From: emre brookes <brookes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Stack Overflow Question
  • From: Ming Cheng via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Macros active in error messages
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Strange exception handling behaviour with dlopen()
  • From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Macros active in error messages
  • From: emre brookes <brookes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: how to prevent the error of "Unable to perform this action because the process is running" when set break?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• how to prevent the error of "Unable to perform this action because the process is running" when set break?
  • From: mx via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Strange exception handling behaviour with dlopen()
  • From: "Nemeth, Laszlo02" <laszlo.2.nemeth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Advice on communication regarding mingw cross build problems
  • From: gmail Vladimir Koković via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Strange exception handling behaviour with dlopen()
  • From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Strange exception handling behaviour with dlopen()
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Strange exception handling behaviour with dlopen()
  • From: David Hagood via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Strange exception handling behaviour with dlopen()
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Strange exception handling behaviour with dlopen()
  • From: Stefan Ring via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Strange exception handling behaviour with dlopen()
  • From: David Hagood via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Strange exception handling behaviour with dlopen()
  • From: "Nemeth, Laszlo02" <laszlo.2.nemeth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC fails to find headers under Ubuntu
  • From: GORDON MCKAY via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC fails to find headers under Ubuntu
  • From: Jim Wilson <jimw@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC fails to find headers under Ubuntu
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• GCC fails to find headers under Ubuntu
  • From: Gordon McKay via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: When will gcc assign local variables to registers?
  • From: x visitor via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: build/make one dynamic link .so file from many C source
  • From: Stefan Ring via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc-8.3.0 into a separate directory from the sources but failed
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: When will gcc assign local variables to registers?
  • From: Henri Cloetens <henri.cloetens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Re: When will gcc assign local variables to registers?
  • From: visitor x via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Spectre mitigations in gcc compiler
  • From: Jim Wilson <jimw@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc-8.3.0 into a separate directory from the sources but failed
  • From: Jim Wilson <jimw@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: build/make one dynamic link .so file from many C source
  • From: Budi via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Building gcc-8.3.0 into a separate directory from the sources but failed
  • From: Jun Leng via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: build/make one dynamic link .so file from many C source
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• build/make one dynamic link .so file from many C source
  • From: Budi via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Installation de gcc
  • From: Henri Cloetens <henri.cloetens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Installation de gcc
  • From: Victor Rodriguez via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: doubt related to O3 optimization
  • From: Ezhil P via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Installation de gcc
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Installation de gcc
  • From: Patrick Bégou <Patrick.Begou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Installation de gcc
  • From: Aubin Dieumegni via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: doubt related to O3 optimization
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• doubt related to O3 optimization
  • From: Ezhil P via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Spectre mitigations in gcc compiler
  • From: Amir Naseredini via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: When will gcc assign local variables to registers?
  • From: Andrew Haley via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Doubt related to O3 optimization
  • From: Ezhil P via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• When will gcc assign local variables to registers?
  • From: visitor x via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Doubt related to O3 optimization
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Doubt related to O3 optimization
  • From: Ezhil P via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: std::from_chars/std::to_chars support
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• std::from_chars/std::to_chars support
  • From: Ming Cheng via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Recursive variadic macros
  • From: Tadeus Prastowo via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Issue with reload
  • From: Henri Cloetens <henri.cloetens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Recursive variadic macros
  • From: <newcomer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: disable generation of .cold functions
  • From: Kit Chow <kitmchow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: disable generation of .cold functions
  • From: Florian Weimer via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• disable generation of .cold functions
  • From: Kit Chow <kitmchow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Cannot Compile GCC 9.3 on AIX 6.1 -- ar: 0707-108 File .libs/libmpn.a is not an archive file.
  • From: Brian Groose <brian@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Cannot Compile GCC 9.3 on AIX 6.1 -- ar: 0707-108 File .libs/libmpn.a is not an archive file.
  • From: Chris Pittsley <chris.pittsley@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Issue with GCC reload
  • From: Henri Cloetens <henri.cloetens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Linker Script: Put object files at specific addresses into ELF file
  • From: Khronis Official via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Issue with GCC reload
  • From: Henri Cloetens <henri.cloetens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Cannot Compile GCC 9.3 on AIX 6.1 -- ar: 0707-108 File .libs/libmpn.a is not an archive file.
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Cannot Compile GCC 9.3 on AIX 6.1 -- ar: 0707-108 File .libs/libmpn.a is not an archive file.
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• cache optimization through samping hardware event
  • From: 李彦成 via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Cannot Compile GCC 9.3 on AIX 6.1 -- ar: 0707-108 File .libs/libmpn.a is not an archive file.
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Cannot Compile GCC 9.3 on AIX 6.1 -- ar: 0707-108 File .libs/libmpn.a is not an archive file.
  • From: Chris Pittsley <chris.pittsley@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Issue with reload
  • From: Henri Cloetens <henri.cloetens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Issue with reload
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Question about GCC's inliner
  • From: Lorenzo Binosi via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Issue with reload
  • From: Henri Cloetens <henri.cloetens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Issue with reload
  • From: Henri Cloetens <henri.cloetens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: cannot find -l-static-libgcc when building gcc from source
  • From: Eric Pellegrini via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: cannot find -l-static-libgcc when building gcc from source
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• cannot find -l-static-libgcc when building gcc from source
  • From: Eric Pellegrini via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• armv7+neon bus error
  • From: Andrey Kazmin via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Disabling ASLR with GCC 8.3.0 on WIndows
  • From: Hannes Domani via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Disabling ASLR with GCC 8.3.0 on WIndows
  • From: "Kacvinsky, Tom" <Tom.Kacvinsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Pointlessly fragile constexpr vector implementation I need some guidance on.
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Installed Gcc 4.94. Does I really need it or Glic is enough?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: LTO resulting in a bigger binary?
  • From: Christer Solskogen via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Installed Gcc 4.94. Does I really need it or Glic is enough?
  • From: alexandre schenberg via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: LTO resulting in a bigger binary?
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: LTO resulting in a bigger binary?
  • From: Christer Solskogen via Gcc-help <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>