Hi, Apologies for the delayed reply. But I understood why we need to do `make install` Also, thanks Peter for telling me the other way around. Maybe someday, I need to use it. Thanks all, -Saloni On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 7:11 PM Peter Bergner <bergner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 4/5/21 11:01 AM, Saloni Garg via Gcc-help wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 8:42 PM Stefan Ring <stefanrin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 3:19 PM Saloni Garg via Gcc-help > >> <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > >>> When I try to compile it with `cc1plus` via command : > >>> ./cc1plus -fanalyzer example8.cpp > >> > >> Why do you want to use `cc1plus` instead of `g++`? > >> > > I want to use the build without installing it. While using `xg++`, I get > > the following error: > > > > xg++: fatal error: cannot execute ‘cc1plus’: execvp: No such file or > > directory > > compilation terminated. > > I do this all of the time. xg++ doesn't know where its cc1plus is, so > you need to tell it using the -B option. For example: > > linux% /path/to/gcc/builddir/gcc/xg++ -B/path/to/gcc/builddir/gcc ... > > Peter > >
