Re: Is this a missed optimization for popcount implementation?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 11:48 AM andre maute <andre.maute@xxxxxx> wrote:

> I'm wondering why is there a special optimization
> for the "trick" code, and why isn't there one for the "naive" code?
>
Because a bug report was submitted for the example that you are calling
trick code.
     https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82479
and a patch was written to fix that.  The bug report says this code is
present in spec2017, which is why they wanted it optimized., and why a
volunteer was willing to write the complicated code necessary to perform
this optimization.

Anyways, yes, I'd call this a missing optimization, though likely of
limited interest, unless you can point at a benchmark or important program
that really needs it.  You are welcome to submit a bug report, and maybe
point back at bug 82479.

But in general, you are better off calling __builtin_popcount.

Jim



[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux