HI,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2020 3:03 PM
> To: Kacvinsky, Tom <Tom.Kacvinsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Anonymous namespaces and global vs.local symbols in nm
> output
>
> On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 at 19:11, Kacvinsky, Tom via Gcc-help <gcc-
> help@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > This code
> >
> > #include <string>
> > #include <istream>
> > #include <iostream>
> > #include <vector>
> >
> > typedef std::vector<unsigned char> Signature;
> >
> > namespace foo {
> > bool bar (const std::string& input,
> > const Signature& signature,
> > std::istream& key)
> > {
> > return true;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > when compiled with
> >
> > g++ -fPIC -o global_noans.so -shared -static-libgcc -static-libstdc++
> > g++ -Wl,-h,global.so -fuse-ld=gold global_noans.cpp
> >
> > produces this nm output
> >
> > 0000000000082745 T
> > _ZN3foo3barERKNSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEERKSt
> > 6vectorIhSaIhEERSi
> >
> > Notice how it is a global symbol?
> >
> > On the other hand, this code#include <string> #include <istream>
> > #include <iostream> #include <vector>
> >
> > typedef std::vector<unsigned char> Signature;
> >
> > namespace foo {
> > namespace {
> > bool bar(const std::string& input,
> > const Signature& signature,
> > std::istream& key)
> > {
> > return true;
> > }
> > }
> > }
> >
> > when compiled with
> >
> > g++ -fPIC -o global.so -shared -static-libgcc -static-libstdc++
> > g++ -Wl,-h,global.so -fuse-ld=gold global.cpp
> >
> > produces this nm output
> >
> > 00000000000826b5 t
> >
> _ZN3foo12_GLOBAL__N_13barERKNSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_trai
> ts
> > IcESaIcEEERKSt6vectorIhSaIhEERSi
> >
> > And now we note the symbolis local. I tried building the shared
> > library with a -Wl,--version-script=global.map, where global.map is
> > set up to make the symbol glocal instead of local, and that did not
> > work. I also tried compiling the source code with
> >
> > void __attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))
> >
> > but that made no difference, either, in the anonymous namespace symbol
> being lobal.
>
> Why do you want to change it? G++ is doing the right thing.
>
> What are you trying to achieve?
I am not trying to change it, I was more curious than anything as to why what I thought should be
external linkage turned out to be internal linkage. The reason why I was surprised it was internal
linkage is I thought that we could do some internal testing with an LD_PRELOAD trick, but that did
not take because the symbol in question is internal linkage. Which is actually a good thing, it was
the kind of behavior we want. Again, it was more curiosity than anything.
Thanks for your time responding!
Thanks,
Tom
